From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
Claudiu.Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: ravb: Do not apply RX checksum settings to hardware if the interface is down
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 23:37:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e48e0cba-572b-93ac-efe4-112305721142@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYCPR01MB112693D3BB55CB8CC91437B87864B2@TYCPR01MB11269.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On 2/9/24 11:41 PM, Biju Das wrote:
[...]
>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>>
>>> Do not apply the RX checksum settings to hardware if the interface is
>>> down.
>>> In case runtime PM is enabled, and while the interface is down, the IP
>>> will be in reset mode (as for some platforms disabling the clocks will
>>> switch the IP to reset mode, which will lead to losing register
>>> contents) and applying settings in reset mode is not an option.
>>> Instead, cache the RX checksum settings and apply them in ravb_open()
>>> through ravb_emac_init().
>>> This has been solved by introducing pm_runtime_active() check. The
>>> device runtime PM usage counter has been incremented to avoid
>>> disabling the device clocks while the check is in progress (if any).
>>>
>>> Commit prepares for the addition of runtime PM.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
>
> This will do the same job, without code duplication right?
>
> static int ravb_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
> netdev_features_t features)
> {
> struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
> const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;
>
> pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
> if (!pm_runtime_active(dev)) {
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> ndev->features = features;
> return 0;
> }
>
> return info->set_feature(ndev, features);
We now leak the device reference by not calling pm_runtime_put_noidle()
after this statement...
The approach seems sane though -- Claudiu, please consider following it.
[...]
> Cheers,
> Biju
MBR, Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-10 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 17:04 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net: ravb: Add runtime PM support (part 2) Claudiu
2024-02-09 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net: ravb: Get rid of the temporary variable irq Claudiu
2024-02-09 20:04 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-09 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: ravb: Keep the reverse order of operations in ravb_close() Claudiu
2024-02-09 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: ravb: Return cached statistics if the interface is down Claudiu
2024-02-09 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: ravb: Do not apply RX checksum settings to hardware " Claudiu
2024-02-09 17:11 ` Biju Das
2024-02-09 20:27 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-09 20:41 ` Biju Das
2024-02-10 20:37 ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2024-02-09 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net: ravb: Add runtime PM support Claudiu
2024-02-09 21:00 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-12 7:56 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-12 20:19 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-02-13 6:59 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-11 8:56 [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: ravb: Do not apply RX checksum settings to hardware if the interface is down Biju Das
2024-02-11 9:40 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2024-02-11 12:13 ` Biju Das
2024-02-11 12:29 ` Biju Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e48e0cba-572b-93ac-efe4-112305721142@omp.ru \
--to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®