mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Gagniuc <alex.g@adaptrum.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	"Baoyou Xie" <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>,
	"Eugeniy Paltsev" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
	"Steffen Trumtrar" <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
	"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] reset: simple: read back to make sure changes are applied
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:00:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561b4eb5-98be-f844-57cb-b5ce5962258f@adaptrum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170816094701.30678-6-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>



On 08/16/2017 02:47 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Read back the register after setting or clearing a reset bit to make
> sure that the changes are applied to the reset controller hardware.

> Theoretically, this avoids the write to stay stuck in a store buffer

Is there hardware where this has been observed to happen, or is this 
purely theoretical? It would be nice to have a "this is needed on 
hardware XYZ because ABC, and doesn't affect other hardware" comment in 
the source.

> during the delay of an assert-delay-deassert sequence, and makes sure
> that the reset really is asserted for the specified duration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/reset/reset-simple.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c b/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c
> index 13e7d5559acc9..d98a7e7d802d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-simple.c
> @@ -39,17 +39,20 @@ static int reset_simple_set(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  	int reg_width = sizeof(u32);
>  	int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>  	int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> +	void __iomem *addr = data->membase + (bank * reg_width);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	u32 reg;
>
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
>
> -	reg = readl(data->membase + (bank * reg_width));
> +	reg = readl(addr);
>  	if (assert ^ data->active_low)
>  		reg |= BIT(offset);
>  	else
>  		reg &= ~BIT(offset);
> -	writel(reg, data->membase + (bank * reg_width));
> +	writel(reg, addr);
> +	/* Read back to make sure the write doesn't linger in a store buffer */
> +	readl(addr);

You're not using the returned value to check that the reset was actually 
set. This seems a very arbitrary readback workaround, which gives no 
indication if it actually succeeded or not.

Also the set() is now asymmetrical to clear(). In cases when releasing 
reset on a HW block that is about to have IO performed on it, one would 
want to make sure the reset is actually deasserted before doing any IO.

Alex

>
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-16 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-16  9:46 [PATCH v3 0/5] Unify simple reset drivers Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16  9:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] reset: add reset-simple to unify socfpga, stm32, sunxi, and zx2967 Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16 11:30   ` Andre Przywara
2017-08-16 12:12     ` Andreas Färber
2017-08-16 15:11       ` Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16 15:17         ` Andre Przywara
2017-08-16 16:41         ` Andreas Färber
2017-08-16 16:46           ` Andre Przywara
2017-08-16 20:46   ` Alexandru Gagniuc
2017-08-16  9:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] reset: socfpga: use the reset-simple driver Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16 20:46   ` Alexandru Gagniuc
2017-08-21  8:45     ` Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16  9:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] reset: stm32: " Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16 12:52   ` Eugeniy Paltsev
2017-08-16 12:55     ` Andreas Färber
2017-08-16 13:03     ` Andre Przywara
2017-08-16 20:50   ` Alexandru Gagniuc
2017-08-16 20:52     ` Andreas Färber
2017-08-16 20:55       ` Alexandru Gagniuc
2017-08-17  9:19         ` Andre Przywara
2017-08-21  8:38           ` Philipp Zabel
2017-08-29  8:39   ` [v3,3/5] " Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2017-08-16  9:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] reset: zx2967: " Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16 20:50   ` Alexandru Gagniuc
2017-08-16  9:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] reset: simple: read back to make sure changes are applied Philipp Zabel
2017-08-16 21:00   ` Alexandru Gagniuc [this message]
2017-08-21  8:21     ` Philipp Zabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561b4eb5-98be-f844-57cb-b5ce5962258f@adaptrum.com \
    --to=alex.g@adaptrum.com \
    --cc=Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=baoyou.xie@linaro.org \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®