mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Narayana Murty N <nnmlinux@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
	Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/23] KVM: PPC: Flush/zap all memslots on kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all()
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 14:26:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bd7e8e9-3614-4006-a3d7-a51416ba5507@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030212112.2598640-4-seanjc@google.com>

Hi Sean,

On 31/10/26 2:50 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Flush/zap every memslot in kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(), i.e. when the
> owning userspace process is exiting, as KVM must ensure all associated
> memory is unmapped from the guest.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 -
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c          | 11 +++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 708a32f89776..50a42f80e5f1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -910,7 +910,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>   #define __KVM_HAVE_CREATE_DEVICE
>   
>   static inline void kvm_arch_memslots_updated(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gen) {}
> -static inline void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>   static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>   static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>   
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 9194cf492d1c..9e9d0865c2f6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -764,6 +764,17 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>   	kvmppc_core_commit_memory_region(kvm, old, new, change);
>   }
>   
> +void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> +	struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> +	int bkt;
> +
> +	slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
> +	kvm_for_each_memslot(slot, bkt, slots)
> +		kvmppc_core_flush_memslot(kvm, slot);

For Book3S HV/hash, I am not sure the existing flush_memslot helper can
be used on an active memslot like this.

The normal memslot invalidation path seems to deliberately establish
the opposite ordering.  kvm_invalidate_memslot() first installs an
INVALID slot and makes it active:

	invalid_slot->flags |= KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID;
	kvm_replace_memslot(kvm, old, invalid_slot);
	kvm_swap_active_memslots(kvm, old->as_id);
and only then does kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(kvm, old);.

The comment there explicitly states:
/*
  * From this point no new shadow pages pointing to a deleted,
  * or moved, memslot will be created.
  */

Similarly, kvmppc_core_flush_memslot_hv() in
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c relies on the memslot already being 
invalid when testing KVMPPC_RMAP_PRESENT without locking, as no new 
HPTEs can be created.

However, kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() in arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c now 
invokes the same helper while walking active memslots.

Is there any serialization in the mmu_notifier.release() path that 
provides the same guarantee against new HPTE creation?

Otherwise, couldn't an H_ENTER or fault path create a new HPTE while the 
rmap is being scanned, or after it has already been examined?

> +}
> +
>   void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
>   				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>   {

Thanks,
Narayana Murty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-30 21:20 [PATCH v4 00/23] KVM: Fix+harden against bad uaccess using dying VM Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] KVM: Reject user accesses to guest memory if current->mm != kvm->mm Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't force a full nested VM-Exit when destroying a vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-11-02 22:03   ` Jim Mattson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] KVM: PPC: Flush/zap all memslots on kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() Sean Christopherson
2026-11-03 17:21   ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-11-04  8:56   ` Narayana Murty N [this message]
2026-11-04 13:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-11-04 17:35       ` Narayana Murty N
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] KVM: x86: Drop dead check on an existing memslot not having any pages Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] KVM: WARN and error out if memslot update encounters existing slot with no pages Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] KVM: x86: Unmap VMAs for KVM-internal memslots when the memslot is freed Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] KVM: x86: Delete non-SMM internal memslot if creating SMM memslot fails Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] KVM: x86: Process all address spaces when deleting internal memslot Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] KVM: x86: Re-queue APICv update request if inhibiting APIC access page fails Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] KVM: x86: Map a separate VMA for each address space for internal memslots Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] KVM: Disallow setting memslots when the VM is being destroyed Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] KVM: Destroy memslots immediately after mmu_notifiers are unregistered Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] KVM: WARN if KVM attempts to do guest-related uaccess with "wrong" process Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] KVM: WARN and reject guest-based uaccess if VM is dying Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] KVM: Pre-check uaccesses in KVM's APIs to read/write guest memory Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] KVM: VMX: Explicility free vmcs01, not the current VMCS, in vCPU free paths Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't explicitly VMCLEAR+free() vmcs01's shadow VMCS when freeing vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] KVM: nVMX: Cancel the nested VMX Preemption Timer's hrtimer in free_nested() Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] KVM: Add lockdep-only APIs to query and assert that a vCPU is unreachable Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] KVM: VMX: Explicitly remove dying vCPUs from the PI wakeup list Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't switch to vmcs01 when freeing a vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't load+put the vCPU when freeing nested state for a dying vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] KVM: x86: Rename __x86_set_memory_region() => x86_set_internal_memslot() Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bd7e8e9-3614-4006-a3d7-a51416ba5507@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nnmlinux@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®