From: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
To: Paul Louvel <paul.louvel@bootlin.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/29] crypto: talitos - Replace SEC1/SEC2 conditionals with ops dispatch
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 11:37:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5dce751a-0d48-467e-b8c9-6702366cfd06@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528-7-1-rc1_talitos_cleanup-v1-20-cb1ad6cdea49@bootlin.com>
Le 28/05/2026 à 11:08, Paul Louvel a écrit :
> Replace the if/else is_sec1 dispatches in callers with indirect calls
> through priv->ops. Add static const sec1_ops and sec2_ops structs
> populated with the SEC1 and SEC2 function variants, and set priv->ops
> at probe time based on the detected hardware.
Why is that needed ?
I understand your objective at the end is to get rid of that is_sec1
boolean that is carried over the entire call chain but using ops for
that seems overkill.
What about changing it to a helper using static branches, something like
(untested) :
#if defined(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TALITOS1) &&
defined(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TALITOS2)
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(talitos_is_sec1);
static __always_inline bool is_sec1(void)
{
return static_branch_unlikely(&talitos_is_sec1);
}
static inline void talitos_init_branch(bool is_sec1)
{
if (is_sec1)
static_branch_enable(&talitos_is_sec1);
}
#else
static __always_inline bool is_sec1(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TALITOS1);
}
static inline void talitos_init_branch(bool is_sec1)
{
BUILD_BUG_ON(is_sec1 && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TALITOS1));
}
#endif
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Louvel <paul.louvel@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/talitos/talitos.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/talitos/talitos.c b/drivers/crypto/talitos/talitos.c
> index b6793d97735e..c4a311a8e7fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/talitos/talitos.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/talitos/talitos.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ static int init_device(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct talitos_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ch, err;
> - bool is_sec1 = has_ftr_sec1(priv);
>
> /*
> * Master reset
> @@ -266,35 +265,23 @@ static int init_device(struct device *dev)
> * are not fully cleared by writing the MCR:SWR bit,
> * set bit twice to completely reset
> */
> - if (is_sec1)
> - err = sec1_reset_device(dev);
> - else
> - err = sec2_reset_device(dev);
> + err = priv->ops->reset_device(dev);
>
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - if (is_sec1)
> - err = sec1_reset_device(dev);
> - else
> - err = sec2_reset_device(dev);
> + err = priv->ops->reset_device(dev);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> /* reset channels */
> for (ch = 0; ch < priv->num_channels; ch++) {
> - if (is_sec1)
> - err = sec1_reset_channel(dev, ch);
> - else
> - err = sec2_reset_channel(dev, ch);
> + err = priv->ops->reset_channel(dev, ch);
> if (err)
> return err;
> }
>
> - if (is_sec1)
> - sec1_configure_device(dev);
> - else
> - sec2_configure_device(dev);
> + priv->ops->configure_device(dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -363,7 +350,6 @@ int talitos_submit(struct device *dev, int ch, struct talitos_desc *desc,
> struct talitos_request *request;
> unsigned long flags;
> int head;
> - bool is_sec1 = has_ftr_sec1(priv);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chan[ch].head_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -377,10 +363,8 @@ int talitos_submit(struct device *dev, int ch, struct talitos_desc *desc,
> request = &priv->chan[ch].fifo[head];
>
> /* map descriptor and save caller data */
> - if (is_sec1)
> - sec1_dma_map_request(dev, request, desc);
> - else
> - sec2_dma_map_request(dev, request, desc);
> + priv->ops->dma_map_request(dev, request, desc);
> +
> request->callback = callback;
> request->context = context;
>
> @@ -461,7 +445,6 @@ static void flush_channel(struct device *dev, int ch, int error, int reset_ch)
> struct talitos_request *request, saved_req;
> unsigned long flags;
> int tail, status;
> - bool is_sec1 = has_ftr_sec1(priv);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chan[ch].tail_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -473,10 +456,7 @@ static void flush_channel(struct device *dev, int ch, int error, int reset_ch)
>
> /* descriptors with their done bits set don't get the error */
> rmb();
> - if (is_sec1)
> - hdr = sec1_get_request_hdr(dev, request);
> - else
> - hdr = sec2_get_request_hdr(dev, request);
> + hdr = priv->ops->get_request_hdr(dev, request);
>
> if ((hdr & DESC_HDR_DONE) == DESC_HDR_DONE)
> status = 0;
> @@ -486,10 +466,7 @@ static void flush_channel(struct device *dev, int ch, int error, int reset_ch)
> else
> status = error;
>
> - if (is_sec1)
> - sec1_dma_unmap_request(dev, request);
> - else
> - sec2_dma_unmap_request(dev, request);
> + priv->ops->dma_unmap_request(dev, request);
>
> /* copy entries so we can call callback outside lock */
> saved_req.desc = request->desc;
> @@ -611,7 +588,6 @@ static __be32 sec2_search_desc_hdr_in_request(struct talitos_request *request,
> static __be32 current_desc_hdr(struct device *dev, int ch)
> {
> struct talitos_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - bool is_sec1 = has_ftr_sec1(priv);
> struct talitos_request *request;
> int tail, iter;
> dma_addr_t cur_desc;
> @@ -630,10 +606,7 @@ static __be32 current_desc_hdr(struct device *dev, int ch)
> do {
> request = &priv->chan[ch].fifo[iter];
>
> - if (is_sec1)
> - hdr = sec1_search_desc_hdr_in_request(request, cur_desc);
> - else
> - hdr = sec2_search_desc_hdr_in_request(request, cur_desc);
> + hdr = priv->ops->search_desc_hdr_in_request(request, cur_desc);
> if (hdr)
> break;
>
> @@ -833,13 +806,9 @@ static int sec2_talitos_handle_error(struct device *dev, u32 isr, u32 isr_lo)
> static void talitos_error(struct device *dev, u32 isr, u32 isr_lo)
> {
> struct talitos_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - bool is_sec1 = has_ftr_sec1(priv);
> int ch, reset_dev;
>
> - if (is_sec1)
> - reset_dev = sec1_talitos_handle_error(dev, isr, isr_lo);
> - else
> - reset_dev = sec2_talitos_handle_error(dev, isr, isr_lo);
> + reset_dev = priv->ops->handle_error(dev, isr, isr_lo);
>
> if (reset_dev) {
> dev_err(dev,
> @@ -1391,6 +1360,32 @@ static void sec2_init_task(struct device *dev)
> }
> }
>
> +static const struct talitos_ops sec1_ops = {
> + .probe_irq = sec1_talitos_probe_irq,
> + .init_task = sec1_init_task,
> + .reset_device = sec1_reset_device,
> + .reset_channel = sec1_reset_channel,
> + .configure_device = sec1_configure_device,
> + .dma_map_request = sec1_dma_map_request,
> + .dma_unmap_request = sec1_dma_unmap_request,
> + .get_request_hdr = sec1_get_request_hdr,
> + .search_desc_hdr_in_request = sec1_search_desc_hdr_in_request,
> + .handle_error = sec1_talitos_handle_error,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct talitos_ops sec2_ops = {
> + .probe_irq = sec2_talitos_probe_irq,
> + .init_task = sec2_init_task,
> + .reset_device = sec2_reset_device,
> + .reset_channel = sec2_reset_channel,
> + .configure_device = sec2_configure_device,
> + .dma_map_request = sec2_dma_map_request,
> + .dma_unmap_request = sec2_dma_unmap_request,
> + .get_request_hdr = sec2_get_request_hdr,
> + .search_desc_hdr_in_request = sec2_search_desc_hdr_in_request,
> + .handle_error = sec2_talitos_handle_error,
> +};
> +
> static int talitos_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &ofdev->dev;
> @@ -1474,16 +1469,15 @@ static int talitos_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> }
>
> if (has_ftr_sec1(priv))
> - err = sec1_talitos_probe_irq(ofdev);
> + priv->ops = &sec1_ops;
> else
> - err = sec2_talitos_probe_irq(ofdev);
> + priv->ops = &sec2_ops;
> +
> + err = priv->ops->probe_irq(ofdev);
> if (err)
> goto err_out;
>
> - if (has_ftr_sec1(priv))
> - sec1_init_task(dev);
> - else
> - sec2_init_task(dev);
> + priv->ops->init_task(dev);
>
> priv->fifo_len = roundup_pow_of_two(priv->chfifo_len);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 9:08 [PATCH 00/29] crypto: talitos - Driver cleanup Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 01/29] crypto: talitos/hash - Use CRYPTO_AHASH_BLOCK_ONLY API Paul Louvel
2026-05-29 11:25 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-01 5:40 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-01 8:06 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 02/29] crypto: talitos - Move driver into dedicated directory Paul Louvel
2026-05-29 11:25 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 03/29] crypto: talitos - Add missing includes to driver header file Paul Louvel
2026-05-29 11:26 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 04/29] crypto: talitos/hwrng - Move into separate file Paul Louvel
2026-05-29 11:26 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 05/29] crypto: talitos - Prepare crypto implementation file splitting Paul Louvel
2026-05-29 13:21 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-29 16:24 ` David Laight
2026-06-01 8:49 ` Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 10:16 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 06/29] crypto: talitos - Introduce registration helper Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 5:45 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 07/29] crypto: talitos/hash - Move into separate file Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:47 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-04 12:31 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 08/29] crypto: talitos/skcipher " Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:47 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 09/29] crypto: talitos/aead " Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:48 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 10/29] crypto: talitos - Remove alg settings in talitos_register_common() Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:53 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-04 12:38 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 11/29] crypto: talitos - Remove unused priority field in struct talitos_alg_template Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:54 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-04 12:39 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 12/29] crypto: talitos/hash - Convert to init_tfm/exit_tfm type-specific API Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:57 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 13/29] crypto: talitos/skcipher - Convert to init/exit " Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:58 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 14/29] crypto: talitos/aead " Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 11:59 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-04 12:44 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 15/29] crypto: talitos/hash - Use macro for algorithm definitions Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 12:02 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 16/29] crypto: talitos/skcipher " Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 12:02 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 17/29] crypto: talitos/aead " Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 12:12 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-10 14:41 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 18/29] crypto: talitos - Split SEC1/SEC2 code into separate function variants Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 5:51 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-01 12:32 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-04 12:46 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 19/29] crypto: talitos - Introduce struct talitos_ops Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 20/29] crypto: talitos - Replace SEC1/SEC2 conditionals with ops dispatch Paul Louvel
2026-06-04 9:37 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) [this message]
2026-06-04 13:05 ` Paul Louvel
2026-06-04 15:26 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 21/29] crypto: talitos - Export common channel and error handling routines Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 22/29] crypto: talitos - Move SEC1 ops into talitos-sec1.c Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 23/29] crypto: talitos - Move SEC2 ops into talitos-sec2.c Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 24/29] crypto: talitos - Introduce per-SEC-version pointer helper ops Paul Louvel
2026-06-04 9:48 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 25/29] crypto: talitos - Dispatch pointer helpers through ptr_ops Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 26/29] crypto: talitos - Remove now-unused global pointer helpers Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 27/29] crypto: talitos - Introduce per-SEC-version descriptor structures and ops Paul Louvel
2026-06-04 9:57 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-04 13:01 ` Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 28/29] crypto: talitos - Clean up includes in core driver file Paul Louvel
2026-05-28 9:08 ` [PATCH 29/29] crypto: talitos - Remove TALITOS_DESC_SIZE macro Paul Louvel
2026-06-04 9:59 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-04 13:01 ` Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 6:15 ` [PATCH 00/29] crypto: talitos - Driver cleanup Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-01 9:17 ` Paul Louvel
2026-06-01 10:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5dce751a-0d48-467e-b8c9-6702366cfd06@kernel.org \
--to=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.louvel@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome