mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Eliminate the PID controller
@ 2017-07-24 22:10 Rafael J. Wysocki
  2017-07-24 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not use PID-based P-state selection Rafael J. Wysocki
  2017-07-24 22:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ->update_util from pstate_funcs Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-07-24 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux PM; +Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada, LKML, Doug Smythies

Hi,

According to testing so far, the P-state selection based on the PID controller
in intel_pstate can be replaced with the P-state selection based on CPU load
with no considerable regressions *and* the PID-based P-state selection is
generally flaky and hard to manage, make intel_pstate use the P-state selection
based on CPU load for all categories of systems and eliminate the PID controller
along with all things related to it from the driver.

[1/2] is the actual elimination.
[2/2] is a simplification possible after [1/2].

Thanks,
Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-24 22:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-24 22:10 [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Eliminate the PID controller Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-07-24 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not use PID-based P-state selection Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-07-24 22:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ->update_util from pstate_funcs Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®