From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block pull request for- 4.11-rc1
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:15:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <633d226d-cec3-a01f-a069-ffff307e9715@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1D08B61A9CF0974AA09887BE32D889DA0A74F3@ULS-OP-MBXIP03.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com>
On 02/19/2017 06:09 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 02/19/2017 04:11 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> - Removal of the BLOCK_PC support in struct request, and refactoring of
>> carrying SCSI payloads in the block layer. This cleans up the code
>> nicely, and enables us to kill the SCSI specific parts of struct
>> request, shrinking it down nicely. From Christoph mainly, with help
>> from Hannes.
>
> Hello Jens, Christoph and Mike,
>
> Is anyone working on a fix for the regression introduced by the BLOCK_PC removal
> changes (general protection fault) that I had reported three weeks ago? See also
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg55494.html
I don't think that's a regression in this series, it just triggers more easily
with this series. The BLOCK_PC removal fixes aren't touching device life times
at all.
That said, we will look into this again, of course. Christoph, any idea?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 0:10 Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 1:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 1:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-02-20 2:12 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-20 2:59 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 3:02 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-20 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 16:32 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 1:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 17:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 17:51 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-24 20:00 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 20:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 21:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-25 18:17 ` hch
2017-02-25 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-21 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-21 23:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:52 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 21:50 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-02-22 21:55 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-23 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=633d226d-cec3-a01f-a069-ffff307e9715@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome