mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason
@ 2024-10-21  9:39 syzbot
  2024-10-29  1:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
  2024-10-29  1:35 ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-10-21  9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: chao, jaegeuk, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    c964ced77262 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11420240580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=cfbd94c114a3d407
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-c964ced7.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e937ef58569a/vmlinux-c964ced7.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f1df9880ca4b/bzImage-c964ced7.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
       sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
       f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
       prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
       super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
       do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
       shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
       shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
       shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
       lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
       shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
       kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
       balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
       kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
       kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline]
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848
       might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
       prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493
       __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722
       alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265
       alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline]
       folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352
       filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010
       do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787
       read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline]
       f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032
       f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079
       f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
       f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785
       write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline]
       __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723
       writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779
       sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849
       f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941
       __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431
       task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228
       resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
       __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
       syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218
       do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
       __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
       f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
       f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
       f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
       f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
       prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
       super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
       do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
       shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
       shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
       shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
       lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
       shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
       kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
       balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
       kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
       kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(sb_internal#2);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(sb_internal#2);
  lock(&sbi->sb_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kswapd0/79:
 #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6844 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
 #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
 #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196
 #2: ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
 down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
 f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
 f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
 f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
 f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
 dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
 prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
 super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
 do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
 shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
 shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
 lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
 shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
 balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
 kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason
  2024-10-21  9:39 [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason syzbot
@ 2024-10-29  1:30 ` Chao Yu
  2024-10-29  1:31   ` syzbot
  2024-10-29  1:35 ` Chao Yu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2024-10-29  1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzbot, jaegeuk, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs; +Cc: Chao Yu

#syz dup: "possible deadlock in f2fs_evict_inode"

On 2024/10/21 17:39, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    c964ced77262 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11420240580000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=cfbd94c114a3d407
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3
> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
> 
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-c964ced7.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e937ef58569a/vmlinux-c964ced7.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f1df9880ca4b/bzImage-c964ced7.xz
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
> ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> 
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> 
> -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
>         __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
>         sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>         prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>         super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>         do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>         shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>         shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>         lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>         shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>         balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>         kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>         kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>         ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
> 
> -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline]
>         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848
>         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
>         prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493
>         __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722
>         alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265
>         alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline]
>         folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352
>         filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010
>         do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787
>         read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline]
>         f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032
>         f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079
>         f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>         f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785
>         write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline]
>         __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723
>         writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779
>         sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849
>         f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941
>         __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431
>         task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228
>         resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
>         exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
>         exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
>         __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
>         syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218
>         do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89
>         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> -> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
>         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>         validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>         __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
>         f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>         f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
>         f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>         prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>         super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>         do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>         shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>         shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>         lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>         shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>         balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>         kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>         kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>         ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 
> Chain exists of:
>    &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2
> 
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
>    rlock(sb_internal#2);
>                                 lock(fs_reclaim);
>                                 lock(sb_internal#2);
>    lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
> 
>   *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> 3 locks held by kswapd0/79:
>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6844 [inline]
>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>   #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
>   #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196
>   #2: ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
> 
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>   print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
>   check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
>   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>   validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>   __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>   lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>   down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
>   f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>   f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
>   f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>   f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>   f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>   dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>   prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>   super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>   do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>   shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>   shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>   shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>   lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>   shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>   kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>   balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>   kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>   kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>   ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
>   </TASK>
> 
> 
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
> 
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> 
> If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
> 
> If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
> #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
> (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
> 
> If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
> 
> If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
> #syz undup
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason
  2024-10-29  1:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2024-10-29  1:31   ` syzbot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-10-29  1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: chao; +Cc: chao, jaegeuk, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

> #syz dup: "possible deadlock in f2fs_evict_inode"

can't find the dup bug

>
> On 2024/10/21 17:39, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>> 
>> HEAD commit:    c964ced77262 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
>> git tree:       upstream
>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11420240580000
>> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=cfbd94c114a3d407
>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3
>> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
>> 
>> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>> 
>> Downloadable assets:
>> disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-c964ced7.raw.xz
>> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e937ef58569a/vmlinux-c964ced7.xz
>> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f1df9880ca4b/bzImage-c964ced7.xz
>> 
>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>> Reported-by: syzbot+be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> 
>> ======================================================
>> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock:
>> ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>> ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
>> 
>> but task is already holding lock:
>> ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
>> 
>> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>> 
>> 
>> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>> 
>> -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
>>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>>         percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
>>         __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
>>         sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
>>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
>>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>>         dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>>         prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>>         super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>>         do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>>         shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>>         shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>>         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>>         lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>>         shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>>         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>>         balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>>         kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>>         kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>>         ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>>         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
>> 
>> -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
>>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>>         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline]
>>         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848
>>         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
>>         prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493
>>         __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722
>>         alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265
>>         alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline]
>>         folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352
>>         filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010
>>         do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787
>>         read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline]
>>         f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032
>>         f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079
>>         f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>>         f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785
>>         write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline]
>>         __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723
>>         writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779
>>         sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849
>>         f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941
>>         __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431
>>         task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228
>>         resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
>>         exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
>>         exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
>>         __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
>>         syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218
>>         do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89
>>         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>> 
>> -> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
>>         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>>         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>>         validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>>         __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>>         down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
>>         f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>>         f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
>>         f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>>         f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
>>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>>         dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>>         prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>>         super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>>         do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>>         shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>>         shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>>         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>>         lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>>         shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>>         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>>         balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>>         kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>>         kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>>         ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>>         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
>> 
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>> 
>> Chain exists of:
>>    &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2
>> 
>>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>> 
>>         CPU0                    CPU1
>>         ----                    ----
>>    rlock(sb_internal#2);
>>                                 lock(fs_reclaim);
>>                                 lock(sb_internal#2);
>>    lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
>> 
>>   *** DEADLOCK ***
>> 
>> 3 locks held by kswapd0/79:
>>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6844 [inline]
>>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>>   #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
>>   #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196
>>   #2: ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
>> 
>> stack backtrace:
>> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
>> Call Trace:
>>   <TASK>
>>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
>>   dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>>   print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
>>   check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
>>   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>>   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>>   validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>>   __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>>   lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>>   down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
>>   f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>>   f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
>>   f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>>   f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
>>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>>   f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>>   dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>>   prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>>   super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>>   do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>>   shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>>   shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>>   shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>>   lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>>   shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>>   kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>>   balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>>   kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>>   kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>>   ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>>   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
>>   </TASK>
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
>> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
>> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
>> 
>> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
>> 
>> If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
>> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
>> 
>> If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
>> #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
>> (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
>> 
>> If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
>> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
>> 
>> If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
>> #syz undup
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason
  2024-10-21  9:39 [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason syzbot
  2024-10-29  1:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2024-10-29  1:35 ` Chao Yu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2024-10-29  1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzbot, jaegeuk, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs; +Cc: Chao Yu

#syz dup: possible deadlock in f2fs_evict_inode

On 2024/10/21 17:39, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    c964ced77262 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11420240580000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=cfbd94c114a3d407
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3
> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
> 
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-c964ced7.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e937ef58569a/vmlinux-c964ced7.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f1df9880ca4b/bzImage-c964ced7.xz
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
> ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> 
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> 
> -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
>         __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
>         sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>         prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>         super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>         do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>         shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>         shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>         lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>         shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>         balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>         kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>         kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>         ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
> 
> -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline]
>         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848
>         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
>         prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493
>         __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722
>         alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265
>         alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline]
>         folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352
>         filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010
>         do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787
>         read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline]
>         f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032
>         f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079
>         f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>         f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785
>         write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline]
>         __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723
>         writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779
>         sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849
>         f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941
>         __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431
>         task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228
>         resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
>         exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
>         exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
>         __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
>         syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218
>         do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89
>         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> -> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
>         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>         validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>         __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>         lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>         down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
>         f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>         f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
>         f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>         evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>         dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>         prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>         super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>         do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>         shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>         shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>         lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>         shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>         balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>         kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>         kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>         ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 
> Chain exists of:
>    &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2
> 
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
>    rlock(sb_internal#2);
>                                 lock(fs_reclaim);
>                                 lock(sb_internal#2);
>    lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
> 
>   *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> 3 locks held by kswapd0/79:
>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6844 [inline]
>   #0: ffffffff8ea37160 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>   #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
>   #1: ffff88804bd920e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196
>   #2: ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
> 
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>   print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
>   check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
>   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
>   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
>   validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
>   __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
>   lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
>   down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
>   f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
>   f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
>   f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
>   f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>   f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
>   evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
>   dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
>   prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
>   super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
>   do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
>   shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
>   shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
>   shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
>   lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
>   shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
>   kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
>   balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
>   kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
>   kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
>   ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
>   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
>   </TASK>
> 
> 
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
> 
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> 
> If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
> 
> If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
> #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
> (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
> 
> If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
> 
> If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
> #syz undup
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-29  1:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-21  9:39 [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason syzbot
2024-10-29  1:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2024-10-29  1:31   ` syzbot
2024-10-29  1:35 ` Chao Yu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®