mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 09/11] KVM: x86: Disable Intel Processor Trace when VMXON in L1 guest
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:39:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69b9277e-e547-95e9-f220-958549f45ec1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eT63cMpJYBLP=9nSApP+=kwyht-XiDamHd6APfXr269Bg@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/01/2018 21:16, Jim Mattson wrote:
> This doesn't look right to me. pt_disable_intercept_for_msr calls
> either vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr or vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr,
> both of which only change vmx_msr_bitmap_legacy
> and vmx_msr_bitmap_longmode. Neither of these MSR permission bitmaps is
> likely to be the one in use by L1 (which is more likely to be using the
> mode-appropriate x2apic or x2apic_apicv bitmap). Moreover, these changes
> affect all of the VMs that are using those MSR permission bitmaps.

Yeah, I replied this morning with something like this, on the thread
about removing the longmode bitmaps.

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-09 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-10 20:30 [PATCH V4 00/11] Intel Processor Trace virtulization enabling Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 01/11] perf/x86/intel/pt: Move Intel-PT MSR bit definitions to a public header Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 02/11] perf/x86/intel/pt: Change pt_cap_get() to a public function Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 03/11] KVM: x86: Add Intel Processor Trace virtualization mode Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 04/11] x86: cpufeature: move processor tracing out of scattered features Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 05/11] KVM: x86: Add Intel Processor Trace cpuid emulation Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 06/11] KVM: x86: Add a function to get the number of address ranges Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 07/11] KVM: x86: Add a function to disable/enable Intel PT MSRs intercept Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 08/11] KVM: x86: Add Intel processor trace context for each vcpu Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 09/11] KVM: x86: Disable Intel Processor Trace when VMXON in L1 guest Luwei Kang
     [not found]   ` <CALMp9eT63cMpJYBLP=9nSApP+=kwyht-XiDamHd6APfXr269Bg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-01-09 21:39     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 10/11] KVM: x86: Implement Intel Processor Trace MSRs read/write Luwei Kang
2017-12-10 20:30 ` [PATCH V4 11/11] KVM: x86: Implement Intel Processor Trace context switch Luwei Kang
2017-12-12 17:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-12 17:09 ` [PATCH V4 00/11] Intel Processor Trace virtulization enabling Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69b9277e-e547-95e9-f220-958549f45ec1@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®