Re: [PATCH v18 02/10] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding

Re: [PATCH v18 02/10] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding

[Jason-JH Lin]

Hello Rob, Krzysztof,

I found the dt-binding patches in this series never appeared in
devicetree-bindings patchwork and trigger the dt-binding check bot.

Do you know the reason for this?
Could you help me with this and let me know what should I do to solve
this problem?

Thanks.

Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin

Re: [PATCH v18 08/10] soc: mediatek: add DDP_DOMPONENT_DITHER0 enum for mt8195 vdosys0

[Jason-JH Lin]

Hi Rex,

Thank for the reviews.

On Fri, 2022-04-15 at 14:24 +0800, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 18:31 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
> > The mmsys routing table of mt8195 vdosys0 has 2 DITHER components,
> > so mmsys need to add DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER1 and change all usages of
> > DITHER enum form DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0.
> > 
> > But its header need to keep DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER enum
> > until drm/mediatek also changed it.
> 
> Hello Jason,
> 
> IMO, it's strange.
> In this case , I think you sholud squash [v18,08/10] and [v18,09/10].
> Therefore, you don't need to describe this here.
> 

As the CK reply before:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220407030409.9664-4-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com/#24806029

[v18,08/10] and [v18,09/10] belong to 2 different trees, so I add the
description here.

Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin


> BRs,
> Rex
> 
-- 
Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>