From: Marc Boucher <marc@linuxant.com>
To: Sean Estabrooks <seanlkml@rogers.com>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, riel@redhat.com,
tconnors+linuxkernel1083378452@astro.swin.edu.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@aracnet.com,
torvalds@osdl.org, nico@cam.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clarify message and give support contact for non-GPL modules
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 18:53:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6C85D188-9BC2-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040501182245.3acce85d.seanlkml@rogers.com>
On May 1, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
>
>> - The word "tainted" is confusing and needlessly scary for average
>> users.
>>
>
> Please stop your political agenda of subverting the open source nature
> of
> Linux. The average user SHOULD find it a scary to run modules
> that don't conform to her choice of OPEN SOURCE OPERATING SYSTEM.
> If the average user wanted to run closed source code she would have
> picked
> a closed source operating system right? Lets not let closed source
> code sneak
> in without putting up big red flags for the user. Lets make sure
> that the
> USER IS NOT CONFUSED about the nature of the module they're loading.
Everyone has an agenda.
Ours is to find reasonable compromise between corporate and community
interests so that Linux users are able to use widespread hardware for
which open-source drivers are otherwise not available or not adequate.
There are several types of devices, like softmodems, for which there is
currently no other alternative method. We believe that this is a
legitimate business, and beneficial to the linux community. Our goal is
not to harm open-source, to the contrary, help it spread by removing
some of the obstacles. Likewise, we help vendors bring their technology
to Linux. We encourage them to fully open-source it when possible and
economically feasible (like in the case of Conexant's riptide driver or
ethernet chipsets for which we have obtained and shared full source
with the community). Otherwise, we try deliver mixed-binary/source
drivers in the most convenient form for users.
Regards
Marc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-01 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <009701c42edf$25e47390$ca41cb3f@amer.cisco.com>
[not found] ` <40929F5B.9090603@techsource.com>
2004-04-30 18:58 ` [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Hua Zhong
2004-04-30 20:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-04-30 19:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-30 19:37 ` Hua Zhong
2004-04-30 22:47 ` Allowing only "-g" compiled modules! (was: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license) Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-04-30 20:11 ` [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Marc Boucher
2004-04-30 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-30 20:39 ` Marc Boucher
2004-04-30 20:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-30 20:53 ` Marc Boucher
2004-04-30 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-30 21:10 ` Timothy Miller
2004-04-30 20:46 ` Sean Estabrooks
2004-04-30 20:34 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-04-30 20:47 ` A compromise that could have been reached. " Timothy Miller
2004-04-30 21:07 ` Marc Boucher
2004-04-30 21:16 ` Rik van Riel
2004-04-30 21:38 ` Timothy Miller
2004-04-30 22:05 ` Marc Boucher
2004-05-01 2:36 ` Tim Connors
2004-05-01 0:40 ` Jorge Bernal
2004-05-01 5:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-01 19:12 ` Marc Boucher
2004-05-01 19:27 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-01 19:32 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-05-01 19:33 ` Sean Estabrooks
2004-05-01 22:14 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-05-01 19:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-05-01 20:53 ` [PATCH] clarify message and give support contact for non-GPL modules Marc Boucher
2004-05-01 21:34 ` Sean Estabrooks
2004-05-01 21:48 ` Marc Boucher
2004-05-01 21:53 ` Sean Estabrooks
2004-05-01 22:22 ` Sean Estabrooks
2004-05-01 22:53 ` Marc Boucher [this message]
2004-05-01 23:10 ` viro
2004-05-02 7:04 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-05-04 17:06 ` Timothy Miller
2004-05-01 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-01 23:28 ` Marc Boucher
2004-05-02 0:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-02 1:02 ` Marc Boucher
2004-05-02 12:43 ` Sean Estabrooks
2004-05-02 13:05 ` Paul Rolland
2004-05-02 15:35 ` Marc Boucher
2004-05-02 15:45 ` Sean Estabrooks
2004-05-04 17:09 ` Timothy Miller
2004-05-01 20:47 ` [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-01 20:58 ` Marc Boucher
2004-05-03 0:04 ` Horst von Brand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6C85D188-9BC2-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com \
--to=marc@linuxant.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=seanlkml@rogers.com \
--cc=tconnors+linuxkernel1083378452@astro.swin.edu.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®