From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, "Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Anand Moon" <linux.amoon@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Dragan Simic" <dsimic@manjaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Skip waiting for link up
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:10:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e87b611-13ea-4d89-8dbf-85510dd86fa6@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E8E4DB773970CB5+5a52c9e1-01b8-4872-99b7-021099f04031@radxa.com>
在 2025/10/21 星期二 12:26, FUKAUMI Naoki 写道:
> Hi Niklas, Bjorn,
>
> I noticed an issue on the Rockchip RK3588S SoC using the ASMedia ASM2806
> PCIe bridge where devices behind the bridge fail to probe since v6.14.
> Specifically, this started happening after commit
> 647d69605c70368d54fc012fce8a43e8e5955b04.
> dmesg logs from before and after this commit are available at:
> https://gist.github.com/RadxaNaoki/fca2bfca2ee80fefee7b00c7967d2e3d
>
> I have confirmed that reverting the following commits fixes the issue:
> commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we
> can detect Link Up")
> commit 0e0b45ab5d77 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Enumerate endpoints based on
> dll_link_up IRQ")
>
Then these two commits would like to reply on link up irq instead of
fixed delay in dwc framework. Here is a not very precise timeline
description.
time(ms) | dw_pcie_wait_for_link() | sys irq_thread() | Hot reset
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0: | dw_pcie_link_up return false | link up irq |
1x | Physical link up happend | |
90: | dw_pcie_link_up return true | |
100: | | msleep(100) done|
10x: | | pci_rescan_bus |
1xx: | | | <==occur
190: | msleep(90) done | |
19x: | pci_host_probe | |
What if the hot reset happens when pci_rescan_bus() starts. I think
scan devices possible fail when seeing 0xffffffff from cfg read. But
a 90ms delay perfectly avoids this event in dw_pcie_wait_for_link(), and
by the time the 90ms delay is completed, the link is actually in an
accessible state.
> On v6.18-rc2, the cold boot behavior has changed somewhat, and I have
> observed the following three behaviors so far:
>
> - Probe succeeds
> - Probe fails
> - Kernel oops
>
> There seems to be no pattern to these three behaviors. During a warm
> boot, a successful probe does not seem to occur.
>
> If commit ec9fd499b9c6 is reverted on v6.18-rc2, I have observed the
> following two behaviors so far:
>
> - Probe succeeds
> - Kernel oops
>
> "Probe fails" has not been observed so far.
>
> The dmesg for the kernel oops is available at:
> https://gist.github.com/RadxaNaoki/4b2dcd5e41b09004eda2fdeb80ae5e15
>
> Can you please help me with this issue?
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> FUKAUMI Naoki
> Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
>
> On 1/13/25 19:59, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>> The Root Complex specific device tree binding for pcie-dw-rockchip has
>> the
>> 'sys' interrupt marked as required.
>>
>> The driver requests the 'sys' IRQ unconditionally, and errors out if not
>> provided.
>>
>> Thus, we can unconditionally set use_linkup_irq before calling
>> dw_pcie_host_init().
>>
>> This will skip the wait for link up (since the bus will be enumerated
>> once
>> the link up IRQ is triggered), which reduces the bootup time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 2adda4102931b152f35d054055497631ed97fe73
>> change-id: 20250113-rockchip-no-wait-403ffbc42313
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/
>> pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>> index
>> 1170e1107508bd793b610949b0afe98516c177a4..62034affb95fbb965aad3cebc613a83e31c90aee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>> @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct
>> rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
>> pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
>> + pp->use_linkup_irq = true;
>> return dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
>> }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 10:59 Niklas Cassel
2025-01-13 19:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-13 21:14 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-01-13 20:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-21 4:26 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-10-21 7:10 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2025-11-08 12:34 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-08 13:27 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-08 14:21 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 4:42 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-09 12:28 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-09 23:16 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-09 23:26 ` [RESEND] " FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-10 2:30 ` Shawn Lin
2025-11-10 4:56 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-10 7:12 ` Shawn Lin
2025-11-10 7:52 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-10 10:15 ` Shawn Lin
2025-11-10 12:34 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-10 12:41 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-10 15:21 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-10 15:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-10 15:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-10 19:59 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-10 22:14 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-11 2:09 ` FUKAUMI Naoki
2025-11-11 3:17 ` Shawn Lin
2025-11-11 14:00 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-11 1:11 ` Shawn Lin
2025-11-10 11:24 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e87b611-13ea-4d89-8dbf-85510dd86fa6@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=naoki@radxa.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®