mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
To: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>,
	gnome-power-manager-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.29] eeepc-laptop: report brightness control events via  the input layer
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:26:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71cd59b00906141226k37b90b9ey7347ed85ec17a17b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b2b86520906131051t32183554r8208cf886609e09c@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Alan
Jenkins<sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 6/13/09, Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> I demand that Corentin Chary may or may not have written...
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alan
>>> Jenkins<alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>> The firmware still changes the brightness immediately.  It seems
>>>> that when g-p-m gets delayed, it responds _wrongly_. It doesn't realize
>>>> that the firmware already changed the brightness, so it changes the
>>>> brightness again.
>>
>> Should it be changing the brightness at all? I ask because every laptop
>> which
>> I've used will change the brightness without userspace being involved.
>> (Although it's possible that g-p-m might get brightness-change events from
>> some source other than that which is used to report the laptop's own
>> brightness controls...)
>
> Good point.  Google suggests it may be necessary on some other systems though.
>
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-bugs/2009-February/067008.html>
>
> And I was wrong before when I said g-p-m should watch the generic
> backlight interface.  It doesn't generate uevents, and in one way
> that's good, because uevents are relatively heavyweight.  So the
> brightness up / down "keypress" events are the only generic way that
> g-p-m can use to detect changes :-(.
>
> But I don't think it's important to be able to show a brightness
> pop-up.  So I'm less confident, but I still think this change should
> be reverted.
>
>> [snip]
>>> Version: 2.24.2-2ubuntu8
>>> Ok I can reproduce [the brightness being changed inappropriately from
>>> userspace].
>>
>>> I want to check if we can't fix g-p-m before reverting the patch. If
>>> there is no way to fix it, I'll revert.
>>
>> I don't see that it can ever be reliable in the face of the brightness
>> having
>> already been changed without userspace involvement short of being able to
>> tell it to report only on some/all events from some input devices.
>
> Hmm.  I think I could accept it if it only played up when thrashing
> the SSD.  So I'll try to work out exactly what happens in the other
> case I reported, in case they're not the same problem.  (This other
> problem is where I hold down "brightness down", then tap "brightness
> up" a couple of times; the first couple of taps casue a flash as the
> brightness goes first up and then down).
>
> Alan
>

CCed gnome-power-manager, as it seems to be the only userspace program
concerned.
You may be able to help us here.

You can find the complet discussion here:
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/a7bef6cffb7c2d6b/c732f616555d5180?#c732f616555d5180


-- 
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net - http://uffs.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-14 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-03 17:57 Darren Salt
2009-04-04  4:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-04  8:33   ` Corentin Chary
2009-04-04 12:20     ` Darren Salt
2009-04-04 12:35       ` Corentin Chary
2009-04-04 22:10         ` Darren Salt
2009-04-05  8:22           ` Corentin Chary
2009-06-08 15:24   ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-13  8:55     ` Corentin Chary
2009-06-13  9:33       ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-13 10:06         ` Corentin Chary
2009-06-13 12:55           ` Darren Salt
2009-06-13 17:51             ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-14 19:26               ` Corentin Chary [this message]
2009-06-15  8:09                 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-15  8:12                   ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-16  8:33                   ` [gpm] " Richard Hughes
2009-06-16  8:34                     ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-16  8:47                       ` Richard Hughes
2009-06-16  9:44                         ` Corentin Chary
2009-06-16 10:04                           ` Richard Hughes
2009-06-18 13:33                             ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-18 22:44                               ` Corentin Chary

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71cd59b00906141226k37b90b9ey7347ed85ec17a17b@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=gnome-power-manager-list@gnome.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®