* Re: kvm crash on 5.7-rc1 and later [not found] <9178ae3e-db32-c64b-7caf-737f3bc3ba8e@gmail.com> @ 2020-07-11 18:21 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-07-12 6:27 ` Xiaoyao Li 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2020-07-11 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Woody Suwalski; +Cc: pbonzini, LKML, xiaoyao.li, fenghua.yu, Thomas Gleixner On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:15:31AM -0400, Woody Suwalski wrote: > I am observing a 100% reproducible kvm crash on kernels starting with > 5.7-rc1, always with the same opcode 0000. > It happens during wake up from the host suspended state. Worked OK on 5.6 > and older. > The host is based on Debian testing, Thinkpad T440, i5 cpu. > > [ 61.576664] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:387! > [ 61.576672] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI > [ 61.576678] CPU: 0 PID: 3851 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 5.7-pingu > #0 > [ 61.576680] Hardware name: LENOVO 20B6005JUS/20B6005JUS, BIOS GJETA4WW > (2.54 ) 03/27/2020 > [ 61.576700] RIP: 0010:kvm_spurious_fault+0xa/0x10 [kvm] > > Crash results in a dead kvm and occasionally a very unstable system. > > Bisecting the problem between v5.6 and v5.7-rc1 points to > > commit 6650cdd9a8ccf00555dbbe743d58541ad8feb6a7 > Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > Date: Sun Jan 26 12:05:35 2020 -0800 > > x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel > > Reversing that patch seems to actually "cure" the issue. > > The problem is present in all kernels past 5.7-rc1, however the patch is not > reversing directly in later source trees, so can not retest the logic on > recent kernels. > > Peter, would you have idea how to debug that (or even better - would you > happen to know the fix)? > > I have attached dmesg logs from a "good" 5.6.9 kernel, and then "bad" 5.7.0 > and 5.8-rc3 I have no clue about kvm. Nor do I actually have hardware with SLD on. I've Cc'ed a bunch of folks who might have more ideas. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm crash on 5.7-rc1 and later 2020-07-11 18:21 ` kvm crash on 5.7-rc1 and later Peter Zijlstra @ 2020-07-12 6:27 ` Xiaoyao Li 2020-07-12 11:54 ` Woody Suwalski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-07-12 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra, Woody Suwalski Cc: pbonzini, LKML, fenghua.yu, Thomas Gleixner, Sean Christopherson On 7/12/2020 2:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:15:31AM -0400, Woody Suwalski wrote: >> I am observing a 100% reproducible kvm crash on kernels starting with >> 5.7-rc1, always with the same opcode 0000. >> It happens during wake up from the host suspended state. Worked OK on 5.6 >> and older. >> The host is based on Debian testing, Thinkpad T440, i5 cpu. >> >> [ 61.576664] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:387! >> [ 61.576672] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI >> [ 61.576678] CPU: 0 PID: 3851 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 5.7-pingu >> #0 >> [ 61.576680] Hardware name: LENOVO 20B6005JUS/20B6005JUS, BIOS GJETA4WW >> (2.54 ) 03/27/2020 >> [ 61.576700] RIP: 0010:kvm_spurious_fault+0xa/0x10 [kvm] >> >> Crash results in a dead kvm and occasionally a very unstable system. >> >> Bisecting the problem between v5.6 and v5.7-rc1 points to >> >> commit 6650cdd9a8ccf00555dbbe743d58541ad8feb6a7 >> Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> >> Date: Sun Jan 26 12:05:35 2020 -0800 >> >> x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel >> >> Reversing that patch seems to actually "cure" the issue. >> >> The problem is present in all kernels past 5.7-rc1, however the patch is not >> reversing directly in later source trees, so can not retest the logic on >> recent kernels. >> >> Peter, would you have idea how to debug that (or even better - would you >> happen to know the fix)? >> >> I have attached dmesg logs from a "good" 5.6.9 kernel, and then "bad" 5.7.0 >> and 5.8-rc3 > > I have no clue about kvm. Nor do I actually have hardware with SLD on. > I've Cc'ed a bunch of folks who might have more ideas. > I think this bug is the same as the one found by Sean, and is already fixed in 5.8-rc4. https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200605192605.7439-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm crash on 5.7-rc1 and later 2020-07-12 6:27 ` Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-07-12 11:54 ` Woody Suwalski 2020-07-12 15:26 ` Woody Suwalski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Woody Suwalski @ 2020-07-12 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xiaoyao Li, Peter Zijlstra Cc: pbonzini, LKML, fenghua.yu, Thomas Gleixner, Sean Christopherson Xiaoyao Li wrote: > On 7/12/2020 2:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:15:31AM -0400, Woody Suwalski wrote: >>> I am observing a 100% reproducible kvm crash on kernels starting with >>> 5.7-rc1, always with the same opcode 0000. >>> It happens during wake up from the host suspended state. Worked OK >>> on 5.6 >>> and older. >>> The host is based on Debian testing, Thinkpad T440, i5 cpu. >>> >>> [ 61.576664] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:387! >>> [ 61.576672] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI >>> [ 61.576678] CPU: 0 PID: 3851 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted >>> 5.7-pingu >>> #0 >>> [ 61.576680] Hardware name: LENOVO 20B6005JUS/20B6005JUS, BIOS >>> GJETA4WW >>> (2.54 ) 03/27/2020 >>> [ 61.576700] RIP: 0010:kvm_spurious_fault+0xa/0x10 [kvm] >>> >>> Crash results in a dead kvm and occasionally a very unstable system. >>> >>> Bisecting the problem between v5.6 and v5.7-rc1 points to >>> >>> commit 6650cdd9a8ccf00555dbbe743d58541ad8feb6a7 >>> Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> >>> Date: Sun Jan 26 12:05:35 2020 -0800 >>> >>> x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel >>> >>> Reversing that patch seems to actually "cure" the issue. >>> >>> The problem is present in all kernels past 5.7-rc1, however the >>> patch is not >>> reversing directly in later source trees, so can not retest the >>> logic on >>> recent kernels. >>> >>> Peter, would you have idea how to debug that (or even better - would >>> you >>> happen to know the fix)? >>> >>> I have attached dmesg logs from a "good" 5.6.9 kernel, and then >>> "bad" 5.7.0 >>> and 5.8-rc3 >> >> I have no clue about kvm. Nor do I actually have hardware with SLD on. >> I've Cc'ed a bunch of folks who might have more ideas. >> > > I think this bug is the same as the one found by Sean, and is already > fixed in 5.8-rc4. > > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200605192605.7439-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com/ > You are right, kvm works OK on 5.8-rc4. The fix will need to be backported to 5.7. Thanks, Woody ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm crash on 5.7-rc1 and later 2020-07-12 11:54 ` Woody Suwalski @ 2020-07-12 15:26 ` Woody Suwalski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Woody Suwalski @ 2020-07-12 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xiaoyao Li, Peter Zijlstra Cc: pbonzini, LKML, fenghua.yu, Thomas Gleixner, Sean Christopherson Woody Suwalski wrote: > Xiaoyao Li wrote: >> On 7/12/2020 2:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:15:31AM -0400, Woody Suwalski wrote: >>>> I am observing a 100% reproducible kvm crash on kernels starting with >>>> 5.7-rc1, always with the same opcode 0000. >>>> It happens during wake up from the host suspended state. Worked OK >>>> on 5.6 >>>> and older. >>>> The host is based on Debian testing, Thinkpad T440, i5 cpu. >>>> >>>> [ 61.576664] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:387! >>>> [ 61.576672] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI >>>> [ 61.576678] CPU: 0 PID: 3851 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted >>>> 5.7-pingu >>>> #0 >>>> [ 61.576680] Hardware name: LENOVO 20B6005JUS/20B6005JUS, BIOS >>>> GJETA4WW >>>> (2.54 ) 03/27/2020 >>>> [ 61.576700] RIP: 0010:kvm_spurious_fault+0xa/0x10 [kvm] >>>> >>>> Crash results in a dead kvm and occasionally a very unstable system. >>>> >>>> Bisecting the problem between v5.6 and v5.7-rc1 points to >>>> >>>> commit 6650cdd9a8ccf00555dbbe743d58541ad8feb6a7 >>>> Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> >>>> Date: Sun Jan 26 12:05:35 2020 -0800 >>>> >>>> x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel >>>> >>>> Reversing that patch seems to actually "cure" the issue. >>>> >>>> The problem is present in all kernels past 5.7-rc1, however the >>>> patch is not >>>> reversing directly in later source trees, so can not retest the >>>> logic on >>>> recent kernels. >>>> >>>> Peter, would you have idea how to debug that (or even better - >>>> would you >>>> happen to know the fix)? >>>> >>>> I have attached dmesg logs from a "good" 5.6.9 kernel, and then >>>> "bad" 5.7.0 >>>> and 5.8-rc3 >>> >>> I have no clue about kvm. Nor do I actually have hardware with SLD on. >>> I've Cc'ed a bunch of folks who might have more ideas. >>> >> >> I think this bug is the same as the one found by Sean, and is already >> fixed in 5.8-rc4. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200605192605.7439-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com/ >> > > You are right, kvm works OK on 5.8-rc4. > The fix will need to be backported to 5.7. > > Thanks, Woody > I see it is already in 5.7.8. Great :-) Thanks, Woody ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-12 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <9178ae3e-db32-c64b-7caf-737f3bc3ba8e@gmail.com>
2020-07-11 18:21 ` kvm crash on 5.7-rc1 and later Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-12 6:27 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-07-12 11:54 ` Woody Suwalski
2020-07-12 15:26 ` Woody Suwalski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome