* Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling paths in stratix10_svc_drv_probe()
@ 2020-04-29 11:51 Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2020-04-29 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christophe Jaillet, Richard Gong
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, Alan Tull, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
Moritz Fischer
> While at it, also move a 'platform_device_put()' call to the error handling path.
How do you think about to use the message “Complete exception handling
in stratix10_svc_drv_probe()” in the final commit subject?
…
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
…
> @@ -1043,24 +1043,34 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
…
> + return 0;
> +
> +put_platform:
> + platform_device_put(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
> +err_free_kfifo:
…
> return ret;
> }
Can the label “err_put_device” be more appropriate for the improved
function implementation?
(Or: Would you like to omit the prefix “err_” for these jump targets?)
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling paths in 'stratix10_svc_drv_probe()'
2020-05-05 14:02 ` Richard Gong
@ 2020-05-05 15:15 ` Christophe JAILLET
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christophe JAILLET @ 2020-05-05 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Gong, gregkh, atull; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Le 05/05/2020 à 16:02, Richard Gong a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Similarly we need add error handling for controller and chans,
> something like below:
>
> @@ -997,13 +997,17 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>
> /* allocate service controller and supporting channel */
> controller = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*controller), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!controller)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!controller) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_destroy_pool;
> + }
>
> chans = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, SVC_NUM_CHANNEL,
> sizeof(*chans), GFP_KERNEL |
> __GFP_ZERO);
> - if (!chans)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!chans) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_destroy_pool;
> + }
>
> controller->dev = dev;
> controller->num_chans = SVC_NUM_CHANNEL;
>
Hi,
This is addressed in patch 1/4.
It moves 'svc_create_memory_pool' after these 2 allocations in order to
avoid the goto.
I'll send a V3 in only 1 patch, as you proposed, it will ease review.
CJ
> On 4/29/20 1:52 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> If an error occurs after calling 'svc_create_memory_pool()', the
>> allocated
>> genpool should be destroyed with 'gen_pool_destroy()', as already
>> done in
>> the remove function.
>>
>> If an error occurs after calling 'kfifo_alloc()', the allocated memory
>> should be freed with 'kfifo_free()', as already done in the remove
>> function.
>>
>> While at it, also move a 'platform_device_put()' call to the error
>> handling
>> path.
>>
>> Fixes: b5dc75c915cd ("firmware: stratix10-svc: extend svc to support
>> new RSU features")
>> Fixes: 7ca5ce896524 ("firmware: add Intel Stratix10 service layer
>> driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
> I am fine with below changes.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
>> b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
>> index de5870f76c5e..739004398877 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
>> @@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> ret = kfifo_alloc(&controller->svc_fifo, fifo_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate FIFO\n");
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_destroy_pool;
>> }
>> spin_lock_init(&controller->svc_fifo_lock);
>> @@ -1043,24 +1043,34 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> /* add svc client device(s) */
>> svc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*svc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!svc)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + if (!svc) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_free_kfifo;
>> + }
>> svc->stratix10_svc_rsu = platform_device_alloc(STRATIX10_RSU,
>> 0);
>> if (!svc->stratix10_svc_rsu) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate %s device\n", STRATIX10_RSU);
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_free_kfifo;
>> }
>> ret = platform_device_add(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - platform_device_put(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto put_platform;
>> +
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, svc);
>> pr_info("Intel Service Layer Driver Initialized\n");
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +put_platform:
>> + platform_device_put(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
>> +err_free_kfifo:
>> + kfifo_free(&controller->svc_fifo);
>> +err_destroy_pool:
>> + gen_pool_destroy(genpool);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
> Regards,
> Richard
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling paths in 'stratix10_svc_drv_probe()'
2020-04-29 6:52 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling paths in 'stratix10_svc_drv_probe()' Christophe JAILLET
@ 2020-05-05 14:02 ` Richard Gong
2020-05-05 15:15 ` Christophe JAILLET
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Gong @ 2020-05-05 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christophe JAILLET, gregkh, atull; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Hi,
Similarly we need add error handling for controller and chans, something
like below:
@@ -997,13 +997,17 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
/* allocate service controller and supporting channel */
controller = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*controller), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!controller)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!controller) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_destroy_pool;
+ }
chans = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, SVC_NUM_CHANNEL,
sizeof(*chans), GFP_KERNEL |
__GFP_ZERO);
- if (!chans)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!chans) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_destroy_pool;
+ }
controller->dev = dev;
controller->num_chans = SVC_NUM_CHANNEL;
On 4/29/20 1:52 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If an error occurs after calling 'svc_create_memory_pool()', the allocated
> genpool should be destroyed with 'gen_pool_destroy()', as already done in
> the remove function.
>
> If an error occurs after calling 'kfifo_alloc()', the allocated memory
> should be freed with 'kfifo_free()', as already done in the remove
> function.
>
> While at it, also move a 'platform_device_put()' call to the error handling
> path.
>
> Fixes: b5dc75c915cd ("firmware: stratix10-svc: extend svc to support new RSU features")
> Fixes: 7ca5ce896524 ("firmware: add Intel Stratix10 service layer driver")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
I am fine with below changes.
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
> index de5870f76c5e..739004398877 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
> @@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = kfifo_alloc(&controller->svc_fifo, fifo_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate FIFO\n");
> - return ret;
> + goto err_destroy_pool;
> }
> spin_lock_init(&controller->svc_fifo_lock);
>
> @@ -1043,24 +1043,34 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> /* add svc client device(s) */
> svc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*svc), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!svc)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!svc) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_free_kfifo;
> + }
>
> svc->stratix10_svc_rsu = platform_device_alloc(STRATIX10_RSU, 0);
> if (!svc->stratix10_svc_rsu) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate %s device\n", STRATIX10_RSU);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_free_kfifo;
> }
>
> ret = platform_device_add(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
> - if (ret) {
> - platform_device_put(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + goto put_platform;
> +
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, svc);
>
> pr_info("Intel Service Layer Driver Initialized\n");
>
> + return 0;
> +
> +put_platform:
> + platform_device_put(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
> +err_free_kfifo:
> + kfifo_free(&controller->svc_fifo);
> +err_destroy_pool:
> + gen_pool_destroy(genpool);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
Regards,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling paths in 'stratix10_svc_drv_probe()'
2020-04-29 6:52 [PATCH 0/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling code Christophe JAILLET
@ 2020-04-29 6:52 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-05-05 14:02 ` Richard Gong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christophe JAILLET @ 2020-04-29 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: richard.gong, gregkh, atull
Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Christophe JAILLET
If an error occurs after calling 'svc_create_memory_pool()', the allocated
genpool should be destroyed with 'gen_pool_destroy()', as already done in
the remove function.
If an error occurs after calling 'kfifo_alloc()', the allocated memory
should be freed with 'kfifo_free()', as already done in the remove
function.
While at it, also move a 'platform_device_put()' call to the error handling
path.
Fixes: b5dc75c915cd ("firmware: stratix10-svc: extend svc to support new RSU features")
Fixes: 7ca5ce896524 ("firmware: add Intel Stratix10 service layer driver")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
index de5870f76c5e..739004398877 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
@@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = kfifo_alloc(&controller->svc_fifo, fifo_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate FIFO\n");
- return ret;
+ goto err_destroy_pool;
}
spin_lock_init(&controller->svc_fifo_lock);
@@ -1043,24 +1043,34 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* add svc client device(s) */
svc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*svc), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!svc)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!svc) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_free_kfifo;
+ }
svc->stratix10_svc_rsu = platform_device_alloc(STRATIX10_RSU, 0);
if (!svc->stratix10_svc_rsu) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate %s device\n", STRATIX10_RSU);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_free_kfifo;
}
ret = platform_device_add(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
- if (ret) {
- platform_device_put(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto put_platform;
+
dev_set_drvdata(dev, svc);
pr_info("Intel Service Layer Driver Initialized\n");
+ return 0;
+
+put_platform:
+ platform_device_put(svc->stratix10_svc_rsu);
+err_free_kfifo:
+ kfifo_free(&controller->svc_fifo);
+err_destroy_pool:
+ gen_pool_destroy(genpool);
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-05 15:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-29 11:51 [PATCH 3/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling paths in stratix10_svc_drv_probe() Markus Elfring
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-29 6:52 [PATCH 0/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling code Christophe JAILLET
2020-04-29 6:52 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix some error handling paths in 'stratix10_svc_drv_probe()' Christophe JAILLET
2020-05-05 14:02 ` Richard Gong
2020-05-05 15:15 ` Christophe JAILLET
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®