[PATCH] drm/tiny: print 'struct resource *' correctly

[PATCH] drm/tiny: print 'struct resource *' correctly

[Yussef Dalton]

Since format specifier %pr refers to a 'struct resource *', there is no
need to take the address of the 'res' variable since it is already of
type 'struct resource *'.

Signed-off-by: Yussef Dalton <yussef.dalton@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
index 2d999a0facde..6372ab383747 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
@@ -1208,13 +1208,13 @@ static struct ofdrm_device *ofdrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
 
 	ret = devm_aperture_acquire_from_firmware(dev, fb_pgbase, fb_pgsize);
 	if (ret) {
-		drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: error %d\n", &res, ret);
+		drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: error %d\n", res, ret);
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
 	mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, fb_pgbase, fb_pgsize, drv->name);
 	if (!mem) {
-		drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", &res);
+		drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", res);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH] drm/tiny: print 'struct resource *' correctly

[Randy Dunlap]

On 10/15/23 06:11, Yussef Dalton wrote:
> Since format specifier %pr refers to a 'struct resource *', there is no
> need to take the address of the 'res' variable since it is already of
> type 'struct resource *'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yussef Dalton <yussef.dalton@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
> index 2d999a0facde..6372ab383747 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
> @@ -1208,13 +1208,13 @@ static struct ofdrm_device *ofdrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
>  
>  	ret = devm_aperture_acquire_from_firmware(dev, fb_pgbase, fb_pgsize);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: error %d\n", &res, ret);
> +		drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: error %d\n", res, ret);
>  		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  	}
>  
>  	mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, fb_pgbase, fb_pgsize, drv->name);
>  	if (!mem) {
> -		drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", &res);
> +		drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", res);
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  	}
>  

-- 
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] drm/tiny: print 'struct resource *' correctly

[Yussef Dalton]

On 10/15/23 17:35, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/15/23 06:11, Yussef Dalton wrote:
>> Since format specifier %pr refers to a 'struct resource *', there is no
>> need to take the address of the 'res' variable since it is already of
>> type 'struct resource *'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yussef Dalton <yussef.dalton@gmail.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
>> index 2d999a0facde..6372ab383747 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.c
>> @@ -1208,13 +1208,13 @@ static struct ofdrm_device *ofdrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
>>   
>>   	ret = devm_aperture_acquire_from_firmware(dev, fb_pgbase, fb_pgsize);
>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: error %d\n", &res, ret);
>> +		drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: error %d\n", res, ret);
>>   		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, fb_pgbase, fb_pgsize, drv->name);
>>   	if (!mem) {
>> -		drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", &res);
>> +		drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", res);
>>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>   	}
>>   
> 

Hi,

Sorry for the bump, but is there any news on my patch?

Regards,

Yussef