From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Roger Tseng <rogerable@realtek.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] rtsx_usb_ms: Use msleep_interruptible() in polling loop
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 23:17:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7afcd6e57d09772699ac37b59db98617@natalenko.name> (raw)
This patch has already been posted to LKML by Ben Hutchings ~6 months
ago, but AFAIK no further action were performed. However, this patch
really fixes weird loadavg with RTS5129 card reader, so I would wonder
if this could be merged. AFAIK, it has been applied to some distros'
kernels, e.g., Ubuntu.
Original Ben's message goes below.
rtsx_usb_ms creates a task that mostly sleeps, but tasks in
uninterruptible sleep still contribute to the load average (for
bug-compatibility with Unix). A load average of ~1 on a system that
should be idle is somewhat alarming.
Change the sleep to be interruptible, but still ignore signals.
A better fix might be to replace this loop with a delayed work item.
References: https://bugs.debian.org/765717
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
---
drivers/memstick/host/rtsx_usb_ms.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/rtsx_usb_ms.c
b/drivers/memstick/host/rtsx_usb_ms.c
index 1105db2..645dede 100644
--- a/drivers/memstick/host/rtsx_usb_ms.c
+++ b/drivers/memstick/host/rtsx_usb_ms.c
@@ -706,7 +706,8 @@ poll_again:
if (host->eject)
break;
- msleep(1000);
+ if (msleep_interruptible(1000))
+ flush_signals(current);
}
complete(&host->detect_ms_exit);
--
2.8.2
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-02 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-02 20:17 Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2016-05-02 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2016-05-03 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-05-03 15:22 ` Ben Hutchings
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-28 0:34 Ben Hutchings
2015-09-28 10:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-09-28 11:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2015-09-28 11:23 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-08 3:37 ` Roger Tseng
2015-10-08 7:19 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-08 19:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2015-10-09 7:18 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7afcd6e57d09772699ac37b59db98617@natalenko.name \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerable@realtek.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®