From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Cyril Brulebois" <kibi@debian.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, jim2101024@gmail.com,
"Florian Fainelli" <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] PCI: brcmstb: Use bridge reset if available
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 01:28:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b8b4b5f-4dc4-4099-b793-d10f2761d364@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+-6iNy2f3zNsSZcFBHnEoTSqDHx34+ijZrLWhnC5bfF=S3nQg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jim,
On 8/12/24 18:46, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 7:16 AM Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> On 8/1/24 01:28, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>> The 7712 SOC has a bridge reset which can be described in the device tree.
>>> Use it if present. Otherwise, continue to use the legacy method to reset
>>> the bridge.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
>>> index 7595e7009192..4d68fe318178 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
>>> @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ struct brcm_pcie {
>>> enum pcie_type type;
>>> struct reset_control *rescal;
>>> struct reset_control *perst_reset;
>>> + struct reset_control *bridge_reset;
>>> int num_memc;
>>> u64 memc_size[PCIE_BRCM_MAX_MEMC];
>>> u32 hw_rev;
>>> @@ -732,12 +733,19 @@ static void __iomem *brcm7425_pcie_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>>
>>> static void brcm_pcie_bridge_sw_init_set_generic(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val)
>>> {
>>> - u32 tmp, mask = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK;
>>> - u32 shift = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_SHIFT;
>>> + if (val)
>>> + reset_control_assert(pcie->bridge_reset);
>>> + else
>>> + reset_control_deassert(pcie->bridge_reset);
>>>
>>> - tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
>>> - tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | ((val << shift) & mask);
>>> - writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
>>> + if (!pcie->bridge_reset) {
>>> + u32 tmp, mask = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK;
>>> + u32 shift = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_SHIFT;
>>> +
>>> + tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
>>> + tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | ((val << shift) & mask);
>>> + writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void brcm_pcie_bridge_sw_init_set_7278(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val)
>>> @@ -1621,10 +1629,16 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (IS_ERR(pcie->perst_reset))
>>> return PTR_ERR(pcie->perst_reset);
>>>
>>> + pcie->bridge_reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev, "bridge");
>>
>> Shouldn't this be devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared? See more below.
>>
>>> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->bridge_reset))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(pcie->bridge_reset);
>>> +
>>> ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
>>> if (ret)
>>> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "could not enable clock\n");
>>>
>>> + pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 0);
^^^ this was missing in v4
>>
>> According to reset_control_get_shared description looks like this
>> .deassert is satisfying the requirements for _shared reset-control API
>> variant.
>> Is that the intention to call reset_control_deassert() here?
>
> Hi Stan,
> Now I'm not sure I understand you. All of the resets (bridge, perst,
> swinit) are exclusive, except for the "rescal" reset, which is shared.
... the call of pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 0) from brcm_pcie_probe()
was missing in previous v4 and I'm wondering what changed in v5.
And because of _shared reset-control description [1] I decided (wrongly)
that the bridge reset could be _shared_.
>
> On the exclusive resets I am using reset_control_assert() and
> reset_control_deasssert(). On the shared reset I am using
> reset_control_rearm() and reset_control_reset(). Why do
> you think the calls I am using are incongruent with the shard/exclusive
> status?
I'd argue that rescal reset is not correctly used in brcm_pcie_probe(),
see [2] and according to [1] "Calling reset_control_reset is also not
allowed on a shared reset control."
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc3/source/include/linux/reset.h#L338
[2]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc3/source/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c#L1632
~Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 22:28 [PATCH v5 00/12] PCI: brcnstb: Enable STB 7712 SOC Jim Quinlan
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Cleanup of brcmstb YAML and add 7712 SoC Jim Quinlan
2024-08-01 16:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-02 6:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 22:07 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-08-13 8:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 17:35 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-08-14 18:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add 7712 SoC description Jim Quinlan
2024-08-01 16:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-02 7:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] PCI: brcmstb: Use common error handling code in brcm_pcie_probe() Jim Quinlan
2024-08-01 16:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-07 2:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-12 20:12 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-08-07 2:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-13 16:45 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2024-08-13 17:06 ` James Quinlan
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] PCI: brcmstb: Use bridge reset if available Jim Quinlan
2024-08-01 16:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-07 2:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-09 11:16 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2024-08-12 15:13 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-08-12 15:46 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-08-12 22:28 ` Stanimir Varbanov [this message]
2024-08-13 15:46 ` James Quinlan
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] PCI: brcmstb: Use swinit " Jim Quinlan
2024-08-01 16:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-07 3:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-12 17:54 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-08-09 9:53 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2024-08-12 13:43 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-08-12 15:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-12 22:05 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] PCI: brcmstb: PCI: brcmstb: Make HARD_DEBUG, INTR2_CPU_BASE offsets SoC-specific Jim Quinlan
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] PCI: brcmstb: Remove two unused constants from driver Jim Quinlan
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] PCI: brcmstb: Don't conflate the reset rescal with phy ctrl Jim Quinlan
2024-08-07 3:05 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] PCI: brcmstb: Refactor for chips with many regular inbound windows Jim Quinlan
2024-08-01 16:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-06 22:58 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2024-08-07 14:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-07 14:16 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-08-07 15:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-12 19:14 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] PCI: brcmstb: Check return value of all reset_control_xxx calls Jim Quinlan
2024-08-07 14:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-12 18:20 ` Jim Quinlan
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] PCI: brcmstb: Change field name from 'type' to 'soc_base' Jim Quinlan
2024-08-01 16:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-07-31 22:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] PCI: brcmstb: Enable 7712 SOCs Jim Quinlan
2024-08-07 14:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b8b4b5f-4dc4-4099-b793-d10f2761d364@suse.de \
--to=svarbanov@suse.de \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
--cc=kibi@debian.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®