From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<hpa@zytor.com>, <dave.martin@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:10:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bb16cf1-567f-4a08-b399-d6069023a02b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2699673-7a5b-441d-8b08-1f7a704afa7d@intel.com>
Hi Chenyu,
On 6/8/26 4:26 AM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> On 6/8/2026 4:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 06 2026 at 10:38, Chen Yu wrote:
>>> From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
>>>
>>> __l3_mon_event_count() and __l3_mon_event_count_sum() call
>>> smp_processor_id() to obtain the current CPU. However, some
>>> monitor events can be read from any CPU in task context via
>>> mon_event_count(); in that case the calling context is
>>> preemptible and smp_processor_id() triggers a debug warning.
>>
>> Is this new with this MMIO stuff or is this an existing issue? If the
>> latter then this patch should be in front of the series and get a fixes
>> tag. If not the change log should explain it.
>>
>
> It is an existing issue. I'll adjust the sequence and provide a fixes tag.
> Thanks!
Could you please elaborate how this is an existing issue?
At this point in implementation mon_evt::any_cpu is and can only be false for
all events associated with resource RDT_RESOURCE_L3. This is highlighted by
the existing splat that will be triggered by the
WARN_ON_ONCE(rr->evt->any_cpu);
that is removed by this patch.
It is this series that makes it possible to read L3 cache occupancy from any CPU.
This is only done in the following patch (6/6) that makes mon_evt::any_cpu for
L3 cache occupancy be conditional on MMIO support enabled by this series.
This patch (5/6) replaces the above mentioned splat with a subtler check since it
is about to become possible for L3 cache occupancy events to be read from any CPU.
I thus do not see this as an existing issue needing fixing but instead a
necessary part of this series that is specifically a preparatory patch for the
final MMIO based event enabling done in patch 6/6.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-06 2:31 [PATCH v3 0/6] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
2026-06-06 2:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and map RMDD domains by L3 cache ID Chen Yu
2026-06-08 8:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-08 11:20 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-06 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table Chen Yu
2026-06-08 8:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-06 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/resctrl: Rename prev_msr to prev_mon_val Chen Yu
2026-06-08 8:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-06 2:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/resctrl: Refactor the monitor read function Chen Yu
2026-06-06 2:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Chen Yu
2026-06-08 8:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-08 11:26 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-08 15:10 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-06-08 16:45 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-08 15:32 ` Luck, Tony
2026-06-08 16:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-06 2:38 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/resctrl: Add support for L3 occupancy monitoring via RMID MMIO read Chen Yu
2026-06-08 8:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-10 1:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Ning, Hongyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bb16cf1-567f-4a08-b399-d6069023a02b@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome