mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	<chao@kernel.org>, <yunlong.song@icloud.com>
Cc: <miaoxie@huawei.com>, <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
	<shengyong1@huawei.com>, <heyunlei@huawei.com>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: check segment type before recover data
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 19:02:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83433157-6a26-07f8-0d36-dc16af6a7754@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c57a26c9-da62-ca5c-b5a3-873d4f1f9ded@huawei.com>



On 2018/1/2 14:49, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/12/30 15:42, Yunlong Song wrote:
>> In some case, the node blocks has wrong blkaddr whose segment type is
> You mean *data block* has wrong blkaddr whose segment type is NODE?
Yes.
>
>> NODE, e.g., recover inode has missing xattr flag and the blkaddr is in
>> the xattr range. Since fsck.f2fs does not check the recovery nodes, this
>> will cause __f2fs_replace_block change the curseg of node and do the
>> update_sit_entry(sbi, new_blkaddr, 1) with no next_blkoff refresh, as a
> Do you mean the root cause is that __f2fs_replace_block didn't update
> next_blkoff?
No, it's not the root cause. The root cause may be something like DDR flip.
>
>> result, when recovery process write checkpoint and sync nodes, the
>> next_blkoff of curseg is used in the segment bit map, then it will
>> cause f2fs_bug_on. So let's check the segment type before recover data,
>> and stop recover if it is not in DATA segment.
> Sorry, I can't catch the whole cause and effect from you description, if
> possible, could you give an example?
For example, the i_inline flag has F2FS_INLINE_XATTR, and the last 50 
i_addrs have xattr
context. But if DDR flips, the i_inline flag may miss F2FS_INLINE_XATTR, 
and the last 50 i_addrs
are considered as data block addr. If the xattr context is 0x1234, and 
0x1234 happens to be
a valid block addr, and the block 0x1234 happens to be in a warm node 
segment. Then do_recover_data
will call f2fs_replace_block() with dest = 0x1234, which will change 
curseg of warm node to
0x1234's segment, and make update_sit_entry(sbi, 0x1234, 1), the 
curseg->next_blkoff also
points to 0x1234's offset in its segment. When recovery process calls 
write_checkpoint, sync
nodes will write to 0x1234's offset of curseg warm node. The 
update_sit_entry will check that
offset and find the bitmap is already set to 1 and then calls f2fs_bug_on.

>
> Thanks,
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 3 ++-
>>   fs/f2fs/segment.h  | 3 +++
>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>> index 7d63faf..e8fee4a 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>> @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		/* dest is valid block, try to recover from src to dest */
>> -		if (is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR)) {
>> +		if (is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR) &&
>> +			is_data_blkaddr(sbi, dest)) {
>>   
>>   			if (src == NULL_ADDR) {
>>   				err = reserve_new_block(&dn);
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> index 71a2aaa..5c5a215 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@
>>   #define SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(sectors)					\
>>   	((sectors) >> F2FS_LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK)
>>   
>> +#define is_data_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr)	\
>> +	(IS_DATASEG(get_seg_entry(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr))->type))
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * indicate a block allocation direction: RIGHT and LEFT.
>>    * RIGHT means allocating new sections towards the end of volume.
>>
>
> .
>

-- 
Thanks,
Yunlong Song

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-02 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-30  7:42 Yunlong Song
2018-01-02  6:49 ` Chao Yu
2018-01-02 11:02   ` Yunlong Song [this message]
2018-01-04  1:38     ` Chao Yu
2018-01-03 20:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-01-04  3:48 ` [PATCH v2] f2fs: check segment type in __f2fs_replace_block Yunlong Song
2018-01-04  5:56   ` Chao Yu
2018-01-04  6:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Yunlong Song
2018-01-04  6:54   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-01-04  7:02 ` [PATCH v4] " Yunlong Song
2018-01-04  7:10   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-01-04  7:22     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83433157-6a26-07f8-0d36-dc16af6a7754@huawei.com \
    --to=yunlong.song@huawei.com \
    --cc=bintian.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=heyunlei@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
    --cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=yunlong.song@icloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®