From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
<chao@kernel.org>, <yunlong.song@icloud.com>
Cc: <miaoxie@huawei.com>, <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
<shengyong1@huawei.com>, <heyunlei@huawei.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: check segment type before recover data
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:38:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d392d1e0-87b6-2854-a3ea-48eda239ea2f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83433157-6a26-07f8-0d36-dc16af6a7754@huawei.com>
On 2018/1/2 19:02, Yunlong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/1/2 14:49, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/12/30 15:42, Yunlong Song wrote:
>>> In some case, the node blocks has wrong blkaddr whose segment type is
>> You mean *data block* has wrong blkaddr whose segment type is NODE?
> Yes.
>>
>>> NODE, e.g., recover inode has missing xattr flag and the blkaddr is in
>>> the xattr range. Since fsck.f2fs does not check the recovery nodes, this
>>> will cause __f2fs_replace_block change the curseg of node and do the
>>> update_sit_entry(sbi, new_blkaddr, 1) with no next_blkoff refresh, as a
>> Do you mean the root cause is that __f2fs_replace_block didn't update
>> next_blkoff?
> No, it's not the root cause. The root cause may be something like DDR flip.
>>
>>> result, when recovery process write checkpoint and sync nodes, the
>>> next_blkoff of curseg is used in the segment bit map, then it will
>>> cause f2fs_bug_on. So let's check the segment type before recover data,
>>> and stop recover if it is not in DATA segment.
>> Sorry, I can't catch the whole cause and effect from you description, if
>> possible, could you give an example?
> For example, the i_inline flag has F2FS_INLINE_XATTR, and the last 50
> i_addrs have xattr
> context. But if DDR flips, the i_inline flag may miss F2FS_INLINE_XATTR,
> and the last 50 i_addrs
> are considered as data block addr. If the xattr context is 0x1234, and
> 0x1234 happens to be
> a valid block addr, and the block 0x1234 happens to be in a warm node
> segment. Then do_recover_data
> will call f2fs_replace_block() with dest = 0x1234, which will change
> curseg of warm node to
> 0x1234's segment, and make update_sit_entry(sbi, 0x1234, 1), the
> curseg->next_blkoff also
> points to 0x1234's offset in its segment. When recovery process calls
> write_checkpoint, sync
> nodes will write to 0x1234's offset of curseg warm node. The
> update_sit_entry will check that
> offset and find the bitmap is already set to 1 and then calls f2fs_bug_on.
Got you, thanks for the explanation. IMO, for better debug, what about
adding f2fs_bug_on here to detect both software and hardware defect in
upstream code? In production, I think you can use your original implementation.
Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 3 ++-
>>> fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 +++
>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>> index 7d63faf..e8fee4a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>> @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* dest is valid block, try to recover from src to dest */
>>> - if (is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR)) {
>>> + if (is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dest, META_POR) &&
>>> + is_data_blkaddr(sbi, dest)) {
>>>
>>> if (src == NULL_ADDR) {
>>> err = reserve_new_block(&dn);
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>>> index 71a2aaa..5c5a215 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>>> @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@
>>> #define SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(sectors) \
>>> ((sectors) >> F2FS_LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK)
>>>
>>> +#define is_data_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr) \
>>> + (IS_DATASEG(get_seg_entry(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr))->type))
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * indicate a block allocation direction: RIGHT and LEFT.
>>> * RIGHT means allocating new sections towards the end of volume.
>>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-30 7:42 Yunlong Song
2018-01-02 6:49 ` Chao Yu
2018-01-02 11:02 ` Yunlong Song
2018-01-04 1:38 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2018-01-03 20:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-01-04 3:48 ` [PATCH v2] f2fs: check segment type in __f2fs_replace_block Yunlong Song
2018-01-04 5:56 ` Chao Yu
2018-01-04 6:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Yunlong Song
2018-01-04 6:54 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-01-04 7:02 ` [PATCH v4] " Yunlong Song
2018-01-04 7:10 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-01-04 7:22 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d392d1e0-87b6-2854-a3ea-48eda239ea2f@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=bintian.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=heyunlei@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
--cc=yunlong.song@huawei.com \
--cc=yunlong.song@icloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®