mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, beanhuo@micron.com, peter.wang@mediatek.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com>,
	Zhaoming Luo <zhml@posteo.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: ufs: Document static TX Equalization settings properties
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 17:28:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8398e275-8d57-48c6-bbf7-f82f423b0a39@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1cd587f0-d571-4bd8-a8c0-97248e732cec@oss.qualcomm.com>



On 5/27/2026 5:24 PM, Can Guo wrote:
>
>
> On 5/27/2026 5:15 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 04:51:04PM +0800, Can Guo wrote:
>>> Hi Mani,
>>>
>>> On 5/23/2026 10:14 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>>> On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 06:47:10AM -0700, Can Guo wrote:
>>>>> UFS v5.0/UFSHCI v5.0 add HS-G6 support (46.6 Gbps/lane) via UniPro 
>>>>> v3.0
>>>>> and M-PHY v6.0. In these specs, TX Equalization is defined for all 
>>>>> High
>>>>> Speed Gears (not only HS-G6) to compensate channel loss and 
>>>>> improve signal
>>>>> integrity at high speed operation.
>>>>>
>>>>> For HS-G6, M-PHY uses PAM4 1b1b line coding, Pre-Coding may also be
>>>>> required depending on channel characteristics.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add vendor-neutral DT patternProperties:
>>>>> txeq-settings-g[1-6]
>>>>>
>>>>> Each property is a uint32 array of per-lane tuples:
>>>>> (PreShoot, DeEmphasis, PrecodeEn)
>>>>>
>>>> I don't think combining all EQ settings (PreShoot, DeEmphasis, 
>>>> PrecodeEn) in a
>>>> single property as opaque tuples is the right approach. These are 
>>>> three
>>>> semantically distinct parameters with independent value ranges. So 
>>>> packing
>>>> them into a uint32 array makes validation impossible in the schema.
>>>>
>>>> AFACIS, PrecodeEn is applicable only to HS-G6 (PAM4), but the proposed
>>>> patternProperties forces it into G1-G5 tuples as well, which is 
>>>> semantically
>>>> wrong.
>>> Point taken for the PrecodeEn.
>>>> PCIe binding defines one property per data rate for EQ presets:
>>>> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/pci/pci-bus-common.yaml#L193 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Similarly, UFS should define one property per gear per (like, 
>>>> txeq-preshoot-g6,
>>>> txeq-deemphasis-g6, txeq-precode-enable-g6,...) rather than 
>>>> clubbing everything
>>>> into opaque tuples.
>>> Thanks for the suggestion. I will go with below approach:
>>>
>>> txeq-preshoot-g6 = <Host Lane 0 PreShoot, Device Lane 0 PreShoot, 
>>> Host Lane
>>> 1 PreShoot, Device Lane 1 PreShoot>;
>>> txeq-deemphasis-g6 = <Host Lane 0 DeEmphasis, Device Lane 0 
>>> DeEmphasis, Host
>>> Lane 1 DeEmphasis, Device Lane 1 DeEmphasis>;
>>> txeq-precode-en-g6 = <Host Lane 0 PrecodeEn, Device Lane 0 
>>> PrecodeEn, Host
>>> Lane 1 PrecodeEn, Device Lane 1 PrecodeEn>;
>>>
>> How about encoding Host and Device values in a single tuple. Like,
>>
>>     txeq-preshoot-g6 = <Lane_0 Host_PreShoot Device_PreShoot>, <Lane 
>> 1...>,
> Man, I don't like that way to be honest, it took me a few minutes to 
> understand it on the PCIe side...
>
> Let's go with my approach please...
I misunderstood your point. I thought you meant the 0x5555 vs 0x55 
stuffs in PCIe side.
I am OK to go with single tuple approach as you suggested, which is more 
readable.

Thanks,
Can Guo.
> Thanks,
> Can Guo.
>>
>> - Mani
>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-27  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260523134711.323425-1-can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
2026-05-23 13:47 ` Can Guo
2026-05-23 14:14   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-05-27  8:51     ` Can Guo
2026-05-27  9:15       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-05-27  9:24         ` Can Guo
2026-05-27  9:28           ` Can Guo [this message]
2026-05-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: ufs: core: Add support for static TX Equalization settings Can Guo
2026-05-23 14:15   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-05-27  8:51     ` Can Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8398e275-8d57-48c6-bbf7-f82f423b0a39@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhml@posteo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®