* [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: allocate pmu index for pci device dynamically
@ 2018-05-18 5:23 Eric Ren
2018-05-18 14:52 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Ren @ 2018-05-18 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: x86; +Cc: tglx, mingo, kan.liang, ak, linux-kernel, renzhen
Some boxes/devices of uncore are exported as pcie devices. However,
the box number is different on different micro-architecture. For
example, the max memory channels for Broadwell is up to 8. However,
there are only 2 channels for Broadwell-DE, 4 channels for Broadwell-EP,
and 8 channels for Broadwell-EX.
The current code allocates pmu index statically so that on Broadwell-EP
machine "perf list|grep uncore" shows discontinuous iMC number, which
doesn't look nice:
Test on Broadwell-EP using "ls /sys/devices | grep -i imc":
Without this patch,
uncore_imc_0
uncore_imc_1
uncore_imc_4
uncore_imc_5
To maintain pmu index dynamically, move index allocation logic to
uncore_pci_probe(). As a result, we can get continuous index of iMC
devices under /sys/devices directory:
Applied this patch:,
uncore_imc_0
uncore_imc_1
uncore_imc_2
uncore_imc_3
Signed-off-by: Shanpei Chen <shanpeic@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <renzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 7 ++++++-
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index a7956fc..88d390e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -818,7 +818,9 @@ static int __init uncore_type_init(struct intel_uncore_type *type, bool setid)
for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++) {
pmus[i].func_id = setid ? i : -1;
- pmus[i].pmu_idx = i;
+ /* The pmu idx will be decided at probe for pci device. */
+ if (setid)
+ pmus[i].pmu_idx = i;
pmus[i].type = type;
pmus[i].boxes = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmus[i].boxes)
@@ -957,6 +959,9 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
if (atomic_inc_return(&pmu->activeboxes) > 1)
return 0;
+ /* Count the real number of pmus for pci uncore device */
+ pmu->pmu_idx = type->num_pmus++;
+
/* First active box registers the pmu */
ret = uncore_pmu_register(pmu);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
index 414dc7e..c4f54fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct intel_uncore_type {
const char *name;
int num_counters;
int num_boxes;
+ int num_pmus; /* for pci uncore device */
int perf_ctr_bits;
int fixed_ctr_bits;
unsigned perf_ctr;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: allocate pmu index for pci device dynamically
2018-05-18 5:23 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: allocate pmu index for pci device dynamically Eric Ren
@ 2018-05-18 14:52 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2018-05-18 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Ren, x86; +Cc: tglx, mingo, kan.liang, ak, linux-kernel
On 5/18/2018 1:23 AM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Some boxes/devices of uncore are exported as pcie devices. However,
> the box number is different on different micro-architecture. For
> example, the max memory channels for Broadwell is up to 8. However,
> there are only 2 channels for Broadwell-DE, 4 channels for Broadwell-EP,
> and 8 channels for Broadwell-EX.
>
> The current code allocates pmu index statically so that on Broadwell-EP
> machine "perf list|grep uncore" shows discontinuous iMC number, which
> doesn't look nice:
>
> Test on Broadwell-EP using "ls /sys/devices | grep -i imc":
>
> Without this patch,
> uncore_imc_0
> uncore_imc_1
> uncore_imc_4
> uncore_imc_5
>
> To maintain pmu index dynamically, move index allocation logic to
> uncore_pci_probe(). As a result, we can get continuous index of iMC
> devices under /sys/devices directory:
>
> Applied this patch:,
> uncore_imc_0
> uncore_imc_1
> uncore_imc_2
> uncore_imc_3
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanpei Chen <shanpeic@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <renzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
I only have one small suggestion.
Except that, the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 7 ++++++-
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> index a7956fc..88d390e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> @@ -818,7 +818,9 @@ static int __init uncore_type_init(struct intel_uncore_type *type, bool setid)
>
> for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++) {
> pmus[i].func_id = setid ? i : -1;
> - pmus[i].pmu_idx = i;
> + /* The pmu idx will be decided at probe for pci device. */
> + if (setid)
> + pmus[i].pmu_idx = i;
I think we may use the same way as func_id to check the pmu_idx.
pmus[i].pmu_idx = setid ? i : -1;
> pmus[i].type = type;
> pmus[i].boxes = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pmus[i].boxes)
> @@ -957,6 +959,9 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
> if (atomic_inc_return(&pmu->activeboxes) > 1)
> return 0;
>
> + /* Count the real number of pmus for pci uncore device */
> + pmu->pmu_idx = type->num_pmus++;
> +
if (pmu->pmu_idx < 0)
pmu->pmu_idx = type->num_pmus++;
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> /* First active box registers the pmu */
> ret = uncore_pmu_register(pmu);
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> index 414dc7e..c4f54fb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct intel_uncore_type {
> const char *name;
> int num_counters;
> int num_boxes;
> + int num_pmus; /* for pci uncore device */
> int perf_ctr_bits;
> int fixed_ctr_bits;
> unsigned perf_ctr;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-18 14:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-18 5:23 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: allocate pmu index for pci device dynamically Eric Ren
2018-05-18 14:52 ` Liang, Kan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome