mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yangxingui <yangxingui@huawei.com>
To: <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	<dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <liuyonglong@huawei.com>,
	<kangfenglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] scsi: support spinup notification for SAS SSP devices in Active_Wait/Idle_Wait state
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:37:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8426bc71-99c7-a2a2-7ac8-9a32f610a50e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703022833.36847-1-yangxingui@huawei.com>

Kindly ping for review...

On 2026/7/3 10:28, Xingui Yang wrote:
> When a SAS HDD connected via SSP (Serial Attached SCSI Protocol) is powered
> up with the RNOT (Ready Not Optimized) bit set, the device enters the
> Active_Wait or Idle_Wait power state per the SAS protocol specification. In
> this state, the device does not respond to standard SCSI START_STOP spinup
> commands and instead returns NOT_READY with ASC/ASCQ = 0x04/0x11 ("Logical
> unit not ready, notify (enable spinup) required").
> 
> Without handling this condition, the SCSI mid-layer will indefinitely retry
> the command with ACTION_DELAYED_RETRY, resulting in the disk never spinning
> up and becoming unusable. A typical manifestation is:
> 
>    sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Spinning up disk...
>    ...not responding...
>    sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Sense Key : Not Ready
>    sd 4:0:9:0: [sde] Add. Sense: Logical unit not ready, notify (enable spinup) required
> 
> To resolve this, the SAS controller needs to send a NOTIFY(ENABLE SPINUP)
> primitive to the target phy, which transitions the device out of the waiting
> state and allows normal spinup to proceed.
> 
> This patch series addresses the issue:
> 
> Adds a new optional spinup_notify callback to struct scsi_host_template
> in the SCSI mid-layer. When ASC/ASCQ = 0x04/0x11 is detected in
> scsi_io_completion_action(), the callback is invoked before the mid-layer
> falls through to ACTION_DELAYED_RETRY, giving the LLDD an opportunity to
> perform controller-specific spinup notification.
> 
> Changes in v2 (addressing Sashiko AI review on v1):
> - Add softirq context documentation to spinup_notify in scsi_host.h
> - Defer sl_notify_ssp() to ordered workqueue, fixing msleep-in-
>    atomic bug, preventing RMW races on SL_CONTROL, and deduplicating
>    concurrent callbacks via queue_work()
> 
> Xingui Yang (2):
>    scsi: scsi_lib: add spinup_notify callback for ASC/ASCQ=0x04/0x11
>    scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle
>      Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices
> 
>   drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h       |  2 ++
>   drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c  | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c |  1 +
>   drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c |  1 +
>   drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c |  1 +
>   drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c                |  4 +++
>   include/scsi/scsi_host.h               | 12 +++++++++
>   7 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> 


Thanks,
Xingui

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03  2:28 Xingui Yang
2026-07-03  2:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: scsi_lib: add spinup_notify callback for ASC/ASCQ=0x04/0x11 Xingui Yang
2026-07-20  9:46   ` John Garry
2026-07-03  2:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: hisi_sas: add spinup_notify callback to handle Active_Wait/Idle_Wait SSP devices Xingui Yang
2026-07-20  9:47   ` John Garry
2026-07-21 11:10     ` yangxingui
2026-07-21 12:33       ` John Garry
2026-07-21 13:33         ` yangxingui
2026-07-22  8:47           ` John Garry
2026-07-22  9:11             ` yangxingui
2026-07-20  2:37 ` yangxingui [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8426bc71-99c7-a2a2-7ac8-9a32f610a50e@huawei.com \
    --to=yangxingui@huawei.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®