* Re: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: check error while registering tty devices
[not found] <20210407021622.1417-1-hdanton@sina.com>
@ 2021-04-07 5:37 ` Jiri Slaby
[not found] ` <20210407082130.1586-1-hdanton@sina.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2021-04-07 5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton, Greg KH; +Cc: linux-kernel, Hao Sun
On 07. 04. 21, 4:16, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Add the error path for registering tty devices and roll back in case of error
> in bid to avoid the UAF like the below one reported.
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 8923 at lib/refcount.c:28
> refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 -origin/lib/refcount.c:28
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 8923 Comm: executor Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5+ #8
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x1cf/0x210 -origin/lib/refcount.c:28
> Code: 4f ff ff ff e8 32 fa b5 fe 48 c7 c7 3d f8 f6 86 e8 d6 ab c6 fe
> c6 05 7c 34 67 04 01 48 c7 c7 68 f8 6d 86 31 c0 e8 81 2e 9d fe <0f> 0b
> e9 22 ff ff ff e8 05 fa b5 fe 48 c7 c7 3e f8 f6 86 e8 a9 ab
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90001633c60 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 15d08b2e34b77800 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: ffff88804c056c80
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: ffffffff813767aa R09: 0001ffffffffffff
> R10: 0001ffffffffffff R11: ffff88804c056c80 R12: ffff888040b7d000
> R13: ffff88804c206938 R14: ffff88804c206900 R15: ffff888041b18488
> FS: 00000000022c9940(0000) GS:ffff88807ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f9f9b122008 CR3: 0000000044b4b000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0
> PKRU: 55555554
> Call Trace:
> __refcount_sub_and_test -origin/./include/linux/refcount.h:283 [inline]
> __refcount_dec_and_test -origin/./include/linux/refcount.h:315 [inline]
> refcount_dec_and_test -origin/./include/linux/refcount.h:333 [inline]
> kref_put -origin/./include/linux/kref.h:64 [inline]
> kobject_put+0x17b/0x180 -origin/lib/kobject.c:753
> cdev_del+0x4b/0x50 -origin/fs/char_dev.c:597
> tty_unregister_device+0x99/0xd0 -origin/drivers/tty/tty_io.c:3343
> gsmld_detach_gsm -origin/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2409 [inline]
> gsmld_close+0x6c/0x140 -origin/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2478
> tty_ldisc_close -origin/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:488 [inline]
> tty_ldisc_kill -origin/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:636 [inline]
> tty_ldisc_release+0x1b6/0x400 -origin/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:809
> tty_release_struct+0x19/0xb0 -origin/drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1714
> tty_release+0x9ad/0xa00 -origin/drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1885
Yes, the fix makes sense. But could you elaborate in the commit log when
this happens? I only wonder how real this is. I assume you inject faults
to allocations?
> Reported-and-tested-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Use my MAINTAINERS e-mail please.
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
> ---
>
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -2384,8 +2384,18 @@ static int gsmld_attach_gsm(struct tty_s
> /* Don't register device 0 - this is the control channel and not
> a usable tty interface */
> base = mux_num_to_base(gsm); /* Base for this MUX */
> - for (i = 1; i < NUM_DLCI; i++)
> - tty_register_device(gsm_tty_driver, base + i, NULL);
> + for (i = 1; i < NUM_DLCI; i++) {
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = tty_register_device(gsm_tty_driver,
> + base + i, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
> + for (i--; i >= 1; i--)
> + tty_unregister_device(gsm_tty_driver,
> + base + i);
> + return PTR_ERR(dev);
> + }
> + }
> }
> return ret;
> }
> --
>
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: check error while registering tty devices
[not found] ` <20210407082130.1586-1-hdanton@sina.com>
@ 2021-04-09 2:00 ` Hao Sun
2021-04-10 8:41 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hao Sun @ 2021-04-09 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton; +Cc: Greg KH, linux-kernel, Dmitry Vyukov, jirislaby
> Can you share the info you know about the syzbot report?
Sorry for the late reply, I don't know the REPORT information of
syzbot because I haven't deployed it.
The attached reproduction program was generated by syz-repro.
As you can see from the repro.cprog, the bug occurred in the case of
fault injection.
In repro.cprog, line 108-109:
inject_fault(81);
syscall(__NR_ioctl, r[0], 0x5423, 0x20000080ul);
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> 于2021年4月7日周三 下午4:21写道:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:37:53 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >
> >Yes, the fix makes sense.
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> >But could you elaborate in the commit log when this happens?
> >I only wonder how real this is. I assume you inject faults to allocations?
>
> After looking at Hao's report [1] again, I think you are right as it was
> reported by syzbot too. Can you share the info you know about the syzbot
> report, Hao, something like the line below with the Reported-by prefix?
>
> (This is just an example Reported-by: syzbot+b804f902bbb6bcf290cb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com)
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CACkBjsYEhOuQUd2qjobumByFtAXyyoGqXgM8gXYZHqsnV8dgUg@mail.gmail.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: check error while registering tty devices
[not found] ` <20210407082130.1586-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-09 2:00 ` Hao Sun
@ 2021-04-10 8:41 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-04-10 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton; +Cc: Jiri Slaby, linux-kernel, Dmitry Vyukov, Hao Sun
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:21:30PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:37:53 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >
> >Yes, the fix makes sense.
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> >But could you elaborate in the commit log when this happens?
> >I only wonder how real this is. I assume you inject faults to allocations?
>
> After looking at Hao's report [1] again, I think you are right as it was
> reported by syzbot too. Can you share the info you know about the syzbot
> report, Hao, something like the line below with the Reported-by prefix?
>
> (This is just an example Reported-by: syzbot+b804f902bbb6bcf290cb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com)
Yes, the changelog text here needs to be fixed up when you resend it to
include this type of information.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-10 8:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210407021622.1417-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-07 5:37 ` [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: check error while registering tty devices Jiri Slaby
[not found] ` <20210407082130.1586-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-09 2:00 ` Hao Sun
2021-04-10 8:41 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®