From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@saeurebad.de>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Yasunori Goto" <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] bootmem: Node-setup agnostic free_bootmem()
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:44:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440804151144l7497dae3nb3b07374fd71a282@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87skxnibb1.fsf@saeurebad.de>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote:
>
> Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
>
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:56:57 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> Make free_bootmem() look up the node holding the specified address
> >>>> range which lets it work transparently on single-node and multi-node
> >>>> configurations.
> >>> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> >>>
> >>> This is far better than the original change it replaces and which
> >>> I also objected to in review.
> >>>
> >>
> >> So... do we think these two patches are sufficiently safe and important for
> >> 2.6.25?
> >
> > It's only strictly needed for .26 I think for some (also slightly
> > dubious) changes queued in git-x86.
>
> Does anything yet rely on this new free_bootmem() behaviour? If not,
> the safest thing would be to just revert the original patch in mainline
> and drop the second patch completely.
1. free_bootmem(ramdisk_image, ramdisk_size) in setup_arch of x86_64 need that
2. another patch in x86.git need that.
YH
commit f62f1fc9ef94f74fda2b456d935ba2da69fa0a40
Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Mar 7 15:02:50 2008 -0800
x86: reserve dma32 early for gart
a system with 256 GB of RAM, when NUMA is disabled crashes the
following way:
Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup
This costs you 64 MB of RAM
Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (ffff8101c0000000,65536K)
Kernel panic - not syncing: Not enough memory for aperture
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc4-x86-latest.git #33
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff84037c62>] panic+0xb2/0x190
[<ffffffff840381fc>] ? release_console_sem+0x7c/0x250
[<ffffffff847b1628>] ? __alloc_bootmem_nopanic+0x48/0x90
[<ffffffff847b0ac9>] ? free_bootmem+0x29/0x50
[<ffffffff847ac1f7>] gart_iommu_hole_init+0x5e7/0x680
[<ffffffff847b255b>] ? alloc_large_system_hash+0x16b/0x310
[<ffffffff84506a2f>] ? _etext+0x0/0x1
[<ffffffff847a2e8c>] pci_iommu_alloc+0x1c/0x40
[<ffffffff847ac795>] mem_init+0x45/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8479ff35>] start_kernel+0x295/0x380
[<ffffffff8479f1c2>] _sinittext+0x1c2/0x230
the root cause is : memmap PMD is too big,
[ffffe200e0600000-ffffe200e07fffff] PMD ->ffff81383c000000 on node 0
almost near 4G..., and vmemmap_alloc_block will use up the ram under 4G.
solution will be:
1. make memmap allocation get memory above 4G...
2. reserve some dma32 range early before we try to set up memmap for all.
and release that before pci_iommu_alloc, so gart or swiotlb could get some
range under 4g limit for sure.
the patch is using method 2.
because method1 may need more code to handle SPARSEMEM and SPASEMEM_VMEMMAP
will get
Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup
This costs you 64 MB of RAM
Mapping aperture over 65536 KB of RAM @ 4000000
Memory: 264245736k/268959744k available (8484k kernel code,
4187464k reserved, 4004k data, 724k init)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-15 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-12 22:33 [patch 0/2] bootmem: Fix node-setup " Johannes Weiner
2008-04-12 22:33 ` [patch 1/2] bootmem: Revert "mm: fix boundary checking in free_bootmem_core" Johannes Weiner
2008-04-13 1:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-12 22:33 ` [patch 2/2] bootmem: Node-setup agnostic free_bootmem() Johannes Weiner
2008-04-13 1:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 10:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-13 16:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-15 6:23 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-15 7:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-15 7:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-15 7:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-15 7:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-15 11:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-15 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-15 19:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-15 7:46 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-15 11:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-15 18:44 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-04-15 19:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-15 19:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-15 20:05 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c440804151144l7497dae3nb3b07374fd71a282@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®