mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Paul Jackson" <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com>, "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Huang,
	Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>, "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printks
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:05:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440806160005q151ee44drac956dc0a3048643@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080616063016.14597.78459.sendpatchset@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com>

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
>
> Page frame numbers (the portion of physical addresses above the low
> order page offsets) are displayed in several kernel debug and info
> prints in decimal, not hex.  Decimal addresse are unreadable.  Use hex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |    2 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c        |   12 ++++++------
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c   2008-06-15 21:51:59.643086905 -0700
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c        2008-06-15 21:51:59.787095630 -0700
> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ unsigned long __init e820_end_of_ram(voi
>        if (last_pfn > end_user_pfn)
>                last_pfn = end_user_pfn;
>
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "last_pfn = %lu max_arch_pfn = %lu\n",
> +       printk(KERN_INFO "last_pfn = 0x%lx max_arch_pfn = 0x%lx\n",
>                         last_pfn, max_arch_pfn);
>        return last_pfn;
>  }
> --- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c  2008-06-15 21:51:56.890920168 -0700
> +++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c       2008-06-15 21:57:04.525557420 -0700
> @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static void __free_pages_ok(struct page
>        int i;
>        int reserved = 0;
>
> -       trace_mark(mm_page_free, "order %u pfn %lu",
> +       trace_mark(mm_page_free, "order %u pfn 0x%lx",
>                order, page_to_pfn(page));
>
>        for (i = 0 ; i < (1 << order) ; ++i)
> @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ static void free_hot_cold_page(struct pa
>        struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
>        unsigned long flags;
>
> -       trace_mark(mm_page_free, "order %u pfn %lu", 0, page_to_pfn(page));
> +       trace_mark(mm_page_free, "order %u pfn 0x%lx", 0, page_to_pfn(page));
>
>        if (PageAnon(page))
>                page->mapping = NULL;
> @@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ nopage:
>        }
>  got_pg:
>        if (page)
> -               trace_mark(mm_page_alloc, "order %u pfn %lu", order,
> +               trace_mark(mm_page_alloc, "order %u pfn 0x%lx", order,
>                           page_to_pfn(page));
>        return page;
>  }
> @@ -3546,7 +3546,7 @@ void __init add_active_range(unsigned in
>  {
>        int i;
>
> -       printk(KERN_DEBUG "Entering add_active_range(%d, %lu, %lu) "
> +       printk(KERN_DEBUG "Entering add_active_range(%d, 0x%lx, 0x%lx) "
>                          "%d entries of %d used\n",
>                          nid, start_pfn, end_pfn,
>                          nr_nodemap_entries, MAX_ACTIVE_REGIONS);
> @@ -3945,7 +3945,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigne
>        for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) {
>                if (i == ZONE_MOVABLE)
>                        continue;
> -               printk("  %-8s %8lu -> %8lu\n",
> +               printk("  %-8s 0x%8lx -> 0x%8lx\n",
>                                zone_names[i],
>                                arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[i],
>                                arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[i]);
> @@ -3961,7 +3961,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigne
>        /* Print out the early_node_map[] */
>        printk("early_node_map[%d] active PFN ranges\n", nr_nodemap_entries);
>        for (i = 0; i < nr_nodemap_entries; i++)
> -               printk("  %3d: %8lu -> %8lu\n", early_node_map[i].nid,
> +               printk("  %3d: 0x%8lx -> 0x%8lx\n", early_node_map[i].nid,
>                                                early_node_map[i].start_pfn,
>                                                early_node_map[i].end_pfn);
>

wonder if we need 0x?

YH

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-16  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16  6:29 [PATCH 1/8] x86 boot: x86_64 build reserve_bootmem_generic fix Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:29 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86 boot: e820 code indentation fix Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:29 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86 boot: x86_64 efi compiler warning fix Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86 boot: allow overlapping ebda and efi memmap memory ranges Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:54   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16  7:32     ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  7:34       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16  8:31         ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  7:07   ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16  8:24     ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  8:53       ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16  9:09         ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  9:14           ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16 15:48         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 16:38           ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 17:05             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 17:37               ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 17:41                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16 18:09                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 18:18                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 18:53                       ` Alan Cox
2008-06-16 19:58                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 17:46                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 18:05                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-17  1:00                     ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16  6:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86 boot: remap efi systab runtime from phys to virt Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  7:02   ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16  8:06     ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  8:27       ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16  8:26         ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86 boot: virtualize the efi runtime function callback addresses Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printks Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  7:05   ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-06-16  8:09     ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86 boot: more consistently use type int for node ids Paul Jackson
2008-06-16  6:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86 boot: x86_64 build reserve_bootmem_generic fix Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16  8:40   ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86802c440806160005q151ee44drac956dc0a3048643@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®