From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/26] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 14:42:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8703b3e0-b5f8-e607-2d8f-3d0b71a5ec3c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02afa8bb-5d27-f229-6085-8f61a626bc63@arm.com>
On 25/05/18 11:40, Julien Thierry wrote:
>
>
> On 25/05/18 11:16, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:49:06AM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
>>> This series is a continuation of the work started by Daniel [1]. The
>>> goal
>>> is to use GICv3 interrupt priorities to simulate an NMI.
>>>
>>> To achieve this, set two priorities, one for standard interrupts and
>>> another, higher priority, for NMIs. Whenever we want to disable
>>> interrupts,
>>> we mask the standard priority instead so NMIs can still be raised. Some
>>> corner cases though still require to actually mask all interrupts
>>> effectively disabling the NMI.
>>>
>>> Currently, only PPIs and SPIs can be set as NMIs. IPIs being currently
>>> hardcoded IRQ numbers, there isn't a generic interface to set SGIs as
>>> NMI
>>> for now. I don't think there is any reason LPIs should be allowed to
>>> be set
>>> as NMI as they do not have an active state.
>>> When an NMI is active on a CPU, no other NMI can be triggered on the
>>> CPU.
>>>
>>> After the big refactoring I get performances similar to the ones I had
>>> in v3[2], reposting old results here:
>>>
>>> - "hackbench 200 process 1000" (average over 20 runs)
>>> +-----------+----------+------------+------------------+
>>> | | native | PMR guest | v4.17-rc6 guest |
>>> +-----------+----------+------------+------------------+
>>> | PMR host | 40.0336s | 39.3039s | 39.2044s |
>>> | v4.17-rc6 | 40.4040s | 39.6011s | 39.1147s |
>>> +-----------+----------+------------+------------------+
>>>
>>> - Kernel build from defconfig:
>>> PMR host: 13m45.743s
>>> v4.17-rc6: 13m40.400s
>>>
>>> I'll try to post more detailed benchmarks later if I find notable
>>> differences with the previous version.
>>
>> Do you have a public git tree anywhere... I *can* apply 26 patches from
>> e-mail but I'd rather pull them!
>>
>
> Yes that makes sense, I'll try to get one set up.
>
> I'll let you know once I have done so.
My public git is up. You can pull the patches from:
git://linux-arm.org/linux-jt.git v4.17-pseudo-nmi
Cheers,
--
Julien Thierry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-25 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-25 9:49 Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/26] arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/26] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpufeature for IRQ priority masking Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 10:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-25 10:17 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 10:36 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-25 10:39 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 10:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-25 10:48 ` Julien Thierry
2018-06-12 13:46 ` Julien Thierry
2018-06-15 10:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/26] arm64: cpufeature: Use alternatives for VHE cpu_enable Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/26] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 10:00 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-05-25 10:25 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/26] irqchip/gic: Unify GIC priority definitions Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/26] irqchip/gic: Lower priority of GIC interrupts Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Remove acknowledge loop Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/26] arm64: daifflags: Use irqflags functions for daifflags Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/26] arm64: Use daifflag_restore after bp_hardening Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/26] arm64: Delay daif masking for user return Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/26] arm64: Make PMR part of task context Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/26] arm64: Unmask PMR before going idle Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 13/26] arm/arm64: gic-v3: Add helper functions to manage IRQ priorities Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 14/26] arm64: kvm: Unmask PMR before entering guest Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 15/26] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 16/26] arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 17/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Factor group0 detection into functions Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 18/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Do not overwrite PMR value Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 19/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking after IRQ acknowledge Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 20/26] arm64: Switch to PMR masking when starting CPUs Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 21/26] arm64: Add build option for IRQ masking via priority Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 22/26] arm64: Detect current view of GIC priorities Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 23/26] irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 24/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Add base support for pseudo-NMI Julien Thierry
2018-06-13 11:14 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 25/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Provide NMI handlers Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 26/26] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow interrupts to be set as pseudo-NMI Julien Thierry
2018-06-13 11:07 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 00/26] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Daniel Thompson
2018-05-25 10:40 ` Julien Thierry
2018-05-25 13:42 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2018-07-20 15:09 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-07-23 12:39 ` Julien Thierry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8703b3e0-b5f8-e607-2d8f-3d0b71a5ec3c@arm.com \
--to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®