* [PATCH] docs: process: submitting-patches: fix typo in section "Respond to review comments"
@ 2023-03-12 7:14 Xujun Leng
2023-03-14 17:31 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Xujun Leng @ 2023-03-12 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: corbet; +Cc: linux, lengxujun2007, linux-doc, linux-kernel
In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is
a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against".
Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com>
---
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and
reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond
politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next
version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
-explaining difference aganst previous submission (see
+explaining difference against previous submission (see
:ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).
See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for recommendations on email
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs: process: submitting-patches: fix typo in section "Respond to review comments"
2023-03-12 7:14 [PATCH] docs: process: submitting-patches: fix typo in section "Respond to review comments" Xujun Leng
@ 2023-03-14 17:31 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2023-03-14 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xujun Leng; +Cc: linux, lengxujun2007, linux-doc, linux-kernel
Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com> writes:
> In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is
> a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against".
>
> Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com>
> ---
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and
> reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond
> politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next
> version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
> -explaining difference aganst previous submission (see
> +explaining difference against previous submission (see
> :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).
Applied, thanks.
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-14 17:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-12 7:14 [PATCH] docs: process: submitting-patches: fix typo in section "Respond to review comments" Xujun Leng
2023-03-14 17:31 ` Jonathan Corbet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®