mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	 linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	 Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	 Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	 Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	 Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>,
	Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cxl: Avoid to create dax regions for type2 accelerators
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:52:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed4965ba.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67119a9189428_3f14294b4@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (Dan Williams's message of "Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:15:29 -0700")

Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:

> Huang Ying wrote:
>> The memory range of a type2 accelerator should be managed by the type2
>> accelerator specific driver instead of the common dax region drivers,
>> as discussed in [1].
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/66469ff1b8fbc_2c2629427@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
>> 
>> So, the patch skips dax regions creation for type2 accelerator device
>> memory regions.
>> 
>> Based on: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168592159835.1948938.1647215579839222774.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com/
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
>> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
>> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
>> Cc: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> index d709738ada61..708be236c9a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> @@ -3473,6 +3473,14 @@ static int cxl_region_probe(struct device *dev)
>>  					p->res->start, p->res->end, cxlr,
>>  					is_system_ram) > 0)
>>  			return 0;
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Accelerator regions have specific usage, skip
>> +		 * device-dax registration.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (cxlr->type == CXL_DECODER_ACCEL)
>> +			return 0;
>> +
>> +		/* Expander routes to device-dax */
>
> So Linux is this weird career choice where you get to argue with
> yourself months later. I understand why I took this shortcut of assuming
> that the coherence mode determines device-dax routing, but that is not
> sufficient.
>
> An HDM-DB region could want the device-dax uAPI, and an HDM-H range
> could want to do its own uAPI besides device-dax.
>
> So, in retrospect, I think it is a mistake to assume uAPI from coherence
> mode. It really is a property of the region decided by the region
> creator independent of the coherence mode or the device type.

Yes.  It isn't a good idea to determine the region usage based on coherence
mode.  In this series, clxr->type is used to designate
expander/accelerator instead of hostonly/dev, it makes more sense to
create device-dax for expander only by default.

> I am thinking that 'struct cxl_region' grows something like:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 5406e3ab3d4a..4cf1d030404d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -511,12 +511,25 @@ struct cxl_region_params {
>   */
>  #define CXL_REGION_F_NEEDS_RESET 1
>  
> +/*
> + * enum cxl_mem_api - where to route this cxl region
> + * @CXL_MEM_API_DAX: application specific / soft-reserved memory
> + * @CXL_MEM_API_PMEM: direct region to the NVDIMM subsystem
> + * @CXL_MEM_API_NONE: accelerator specific / hard-reserved memory
> + */
> +enum cxl_mem_api {
> +	CXL_MEM_API_DAX,
> +	CXL_MEM_API_PMEM,
> +	CXL_MEM_API_NONE,
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * struct cxl_region - CXL region
>   * @dev: This region's device
>   * @id: This region's id. Id is globally unique across all regions
>   * @mode: Endpoint decoder allocation / access mode
>   * @type: Endpoint decoder target type
> + * @api: What if any subsystem will present this region to consumers
>   * @cxl_nvb: nvdimm bridge for coordinating @cxlr_pmem setup / shutdown
>   * @cxlr_pmem: (for pmem regions) cached copy of the nvdimm bridge
>   * @flags: Region state flags
> @@ -530,6 +543,7 @@ struct cxl_region {
>  	int id;
>  	enum cxl_decoder_mode mode;
>  	enum cxl_decoder_type type;
> +	enum cxl_mem_api api;
>  	struct cxl_nvdimm_bridge *cxl_nvb;
>  	struct cxl_pmem_region *cxlr_pmem;
>  	unsigned long flags;

This looks good to me.  The usage is specified by the device driver explicitly.

> Now, I have not seen how Alejandro's series handles this, but this
> type-2 series was shorter so I started here first.

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

      reply	other threads:[~2024-10-21 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-15  6:57 [PATCH 0/5] cxl: Some preparation work for type2 accelerators support Huang Ying
2024-10-15  6:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] cxl: Rename ACPI_CEDT_CFMWS_RESTRICT_TYPE2/TYPE3 Huang Ying
2024-10-15  6:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] cxl: Rename CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM/DEVMEM Huang Ying
2024-10-17 22:21   ` Dan Williams
2024-10-18  6:18     ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-18 21:17       ` Dan Williams
2024-10-21  4:40         ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-15  6:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] cxl: Separate coherence from target type Huang Ying
2024-10-17 22:25   ` Dan Williams
2024-10-15  6:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] cxl: Set type of region to that of the first endpoint Huang Ying
2024-10-17 22:33   ` Dan Williams
2024-10-18  6:50     ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-18 21:19       ` Dan Williams
2024-10-21  6:33         ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-21  9:47     ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-15  6:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] cxl: Avoid to create dax regions for type2 accelerators Huang Ying
2024-10-15  8:51   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-17  6:29     ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-17  7:27       ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-17  7:48         ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-18  9:57           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-21 11:37             ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-17 23:15   ` Dan Williams
2024-10-21 11:52     ` Huang, Ying [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ed4965ba.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®