From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>,
Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cxl: Avoid to create dax regions for type2 accelerators
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:52:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed4965ba.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67119a9189428_3f14294b4@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (Dan Williams's message of "Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:15:29 -0700")
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> Huang Ying wrote:
>> The memory range of a type2 accelerator should be managed by the type2
>> accelerator specific driver instead of the common dax region drivers,
>> as discussed in [1].
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/66469ff1b8fbc_2c2629427@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
>>
>> So, the patch skips dax regions creation for type2 accelerator device
>> memory regions.
>>
>> Based on: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/168592159835.1948938.1647215579839222774.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
>> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
>> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
>> Cc: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> index d709738ada61..708be236c9a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> @@ -3473,6 +3473,14 @@ static int cxl_region_probe(struct device *dev)
>> p->res->start, p->res->end, cxlr,
>> is_system_ram) > 0)
>> return 0;
>> + /*
>> + * Accelerator regions have specific usage, skip
>> + * device-dax registration.
>> + */
>> + if (cxlr->type == CXL_DECODER_ACCEL)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Expander routes to device-dax */
>
> So Linux is this weird career choice where you get to argue with
> yourself months later. I understand why I took this shortcut of assuming
> that the coherence mode determines device-dax routing, but that is not
> sufficient.
>
> An HDM-DB region could want the device-dax uAPI, and an HDM-H range
> could want to do its own uAPI besides device-dax.
>
> So, in retrospect, I think it is a mistake to assume uAPI from coherence
> mode. It really is a property of the region decided by the region
> creator independent of the coherence mode or the device type.
Yes. It isn't a good idea to determine the region usage based on coherence
mode. In this series, clxr->type is used to designate
expander/accelerator instead of hostonly/dev, it makes more sense to
create device-dax for expander only by default.
> I am thinking that 'struct cxl_region' grows something like:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 5406e3ab3d4a..4cf1d030404d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -511,12 +511,25 @@ struct cxl_region_params {
> */
> #define CXL_REGION_F_NEEDS_RESET 1
>
> +/*
> + * enum cxl_mem_api - where to route this cxl region
> + * @CXL_MEM_API_DAX: application specific / soft-reserved memory
> + * @CXL_MEM_API_PMEM: direct region to the NVDIMM subsystem
> + * @CXL_MEM_API_NONE: accelerator specific / hard-reserved memory
> + */
> +enum cxl_mem_api {
> + CXL_MEM_API_DAX,
> + CXL_MEM_API_PMEM,
> + CXL_MEM_API_NONE,
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct cxl_region - CXL region
> * @dev: This region's device
> * @id: This region's id. Id is globally unique across all regions
> * @mode: Endpoint decoder allocation / access mode
> * @type: Endpoint decoder target type
> + * @api: What if any subsystem will present this region to consumers
> * @cxl_nvb: nvdimm bridge for coordinating @cxlr_pmem setup / shutdown
> * @cxlr_pmem: (for pmem regions) cached copy of the nvdimm bridge
> * @flags: Region state flags
> @@ -530,6 +543,7 @@ struct cxl_region {
> int id;
> enum cxl_decoder_mode mode;
> enum cxl_decoder_type type;
> + enum cxl_mem_api api;
> struct cxl_nvdimm_bridge *cxl_nvb;
> struct cxl_pmem_region *cxlr_pmem;
> unsigned long flags;
This looks good to me. The usage is specified by the device driver explicitly.
> Now, I have not seen how Alejandro's series handles this, but this
> type-2 series was shorter so I started here first.
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 6:57 [PATCH 0/5] cxl: Some preparation work for type2 accelerators support Huang Ying
2024-10-15 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] cxl: Rename ACPI_CEDT_CFMWS_RESTRICT_TYPE2/TYPE3 Huang Ying
2024-10-15 6:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] cxl: Rename CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM/DEVMEM Huang Ying
2024-10-17 22:21 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-18 6:18 ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-18 21:17 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-21 4:40 ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-15 6:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] cxl: Separate coherence from target type Huang Ying
2024-10-17 22:25 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-15 6:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] cxl: Set type of region to that of the first endpoint Huang Ying
2024-10-17 22:33 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-18 6:50 ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-18 21:19 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-21 6:33 ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-21 9:47 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-15 6:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] cxl: Avoid to create dax regions for type2 accelerators Huang Ying
2024-10-15 8:51 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-17 6:29 ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-17 7:27 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-17 7:48 ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-18 9:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-21 11:37 ` Huang, Ying
2024-10-17 23:15 ` Dan Williams
2024-10-21 11:52 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ed4965ba.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®