Re: [tip: timers/clocksource] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Don't register as a sched_clock on arm64

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 11:13, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 29/07/2025 10:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 09:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> just a gentle ping for the question below about dropping the two patches.
>>>
>>> On 25/07/2025 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>>>> So I got no answer for this question, but I suppose my assumption is
>>>>> correct - so I've rebased the tip:timers/clocksource commits to fix the
>>>>> misattribution and a number of other problems, and also fixed various
>>>>> typos, spelling mistakes and inconsistencies in the changelogs while at
>>>>> it. Let me know if I got something wrong.
>>>>
>>>> If the rebase is possible, I suggest to take the opportunity to remove
>>>> the following patches:
>>>>
>>>> commit 5d86e479193b - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support
>>>> commit 7e477e9c4eb4 - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix section
>>>> mismatch from the module conversion
>>>>
>>>> Because of:
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725090349.87730-2-
>>>> krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>>>>
>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bccb77b9-7cdc-4965-
>>>> aa05-05836466f81f@app.fastmail.com/
>> 
>> Grrr.
>> 
>> I've already sent the pull request for the pile. Let me ask Linus not to
>> pull and I revert them on top.
>> 
>> Also please reset your clockevents branch so next does not have the
>> conflicting SHAs
>
> There is revert otherwise above [1]

It's incomplete :)

I just reverted all three exynos mct related changes on top of the
timers/clocksource branch and pushed the result out.

Thanks,

        tglx