Re: [tip: timers/clocksource] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Don't register as a sched_clock on arm64

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 10:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 09:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> just a gentle ping for the question below about dropping the two patches.
>>
>> On 25/07/2025 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>>> So I got no answer for this question, but I suppose my assumption is
>>>> correct - so I've rebased the tip:timers/clocksource commits to fix the
>>>> misattribution and a number of other problems, and also fixed various
>>>> typos, spelling mistakes and inconsistencies in the changelogs while at
>>>> it. Let me know if I got something wrong.
>>> 
>>> If the rebase is possible, I suggest to take the opportunity to remove 
>>> the following patches:
>>> 
>>> commit 5d86e479193b - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support
>>> commit 7e477e9c4eb4 - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix section 
>>> mismatch from the module conversion
>>> 
>>> Because of:
>>> 
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725090349.87730-2- 
>>> krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>>> 
>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bccb77b9-7cdc-4965- 
>>> aa05-05836466f81f@app.fastmail.com/
>
> Grrr.
>
> I've already sent the pull request for the pile. Let me ask Linus not to
> pull and I revert them on top.

That requires to revert 2798e90b4e09 ("arm64: exynos: Drop select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT")
as well, no?

Thanks,

        tglx