mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: disable optimistic spin during panic
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:15:05 +0106	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilu5pmtq.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfJFjHdg/khNXiRd@google.com>

On 2022-01-27, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:
> Right. So I also thought about placing panic_in_progress() somewhere in
> console_trylock() and make it fail for anything that is not a panic
> CPU.

I think this is a good idea and console_trylock() is the correct place
for that.

> Back in the days we also had this idea of "detaching" non-panic CPUs from
> printk() by overwriting their printk function pointers.

We need to keep in mind that printk() is no longer the problem. The
records are stored locklessly. The problem is the
console_trylock()/console_unlock() within vprintk_emit(). IMHO adding a
panic check in console_trylock() should solve that race sufficiently.

John

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-27  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21 19:02 [PATCH 0/4] printk: reduce deadlocks " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] panic: Add panic_in_progress helper Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 11:48   ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-26 17:37     ` Stephen Brennan
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: disable optimistic spin during panic Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 12:42   ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-26  9:18   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-26  9:45     ` John Ogness
2022-01-26 10:06       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-26 18:15         ` Stephen Brennan
2022-01-27  7:11           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-27  9:09             ` John Ogness [this message]
2022-01-27 11:38             ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-27 12:43               ` John Ogness
2022-01-27 14:25                 ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: Avoid livelock with heavy printk " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 14:25   ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] printk: Drop console_sem " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-24 16:12   ` John Ogness
2022-01-24 16:26     ` John Ogness
2022-01-25 15:04     ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ilu5pmtq.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®