mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] printk: Drop console_sem during panic
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:18:42 +0106	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmoh3yf9.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220121190222.572694-5-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>

On 2022-01-21, Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com> wrote:
> If another CPU is in panic, we are about to be halted. Try to gracefully
> drop console_sem and allow the panic CPU to grab it easily.
>
> Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/printk/printk.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index ca253ac07615..c2dc8ebd9509 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -2668,7 +2668,7 @@ void console_unlock(void)
>  
>  	for (;;) {
>  		size_t ext_len = 0;
> -		int handover;
> +		int handover, pcpu;
>  		size_t len;
>  
>  skip:
> @@ -2739,6 +2739,12 @@ void console_unlock(void)
>  		if (handover)
>  			return;
>  
> +		/* Allow panic_cpu to take over the consoles safely */
> +		pcpu = atomic_read(&panic_cpu);
> +		if (unlikely(pcpu != PANIC_CPU_INVALID &&
> +		    pcpu != raw_smp_processor_id()))
> +			break;
> +

Keep in mind that after the "break", this context will try to re-acquire
the console lock and continue printing. That is a pretty small window
for the panic CPU to attempt a trylock.

Perhaps the retry after the loop should also be avoided for non-panic
CPUs. This would rely on the panic CPU taking over (as your comment
suggests will happen). Since the panic-CPU calls pr_emerg() as the final
record before drifting off to neverland, that is probably OK.

Something like:

@@ -2731,7 +2731,8 @@ void console_unlock(void)
 	 * there's a new owner and the console_unlock() from them will do the
 	 * flush, no worries.
 	 */
-	retry = prb_read_valid(prb, next_seq, NULL);
+	retry = (pcpu != raw_smp_processor_id()) &&
+		prb_read_valid(prb, next_seq, NULL);
 	if (retry && console_trylock())
 		goto again;
 }

I would also like to see a comment about why it is acceptable to use
raw_smp_processor_id() in a context that has migration
enabled. Something like: raw_smp_processor_id() can be used because this
context cannot be migrated to the panic CPU.

John Ogness

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-24 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21 19:02 [PATCH 0/4] printk: reduce deadlocks " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] panic: Add panic_in_progress helper Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 11:48   ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-26 17:37     ` Stephen Brennan
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: disable optimistic spin during panic Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 12:42   ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-26  9:18   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-26  9:45     ` John Ogness
2022-01-26 10:06       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-26 18:15         ` Stephen Brennan
2022-01-27  7:11           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-27  9:09             ` John Ogness
2022-01-27 11:38             ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-27 12:43               ` John Ogness
2022-01-27 14:25                 ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: Avoid livelock with heavy printk " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 14:25   ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] printk: Drop console_sem " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-24 16:12   ` John Ogness [this message]
2022-01-24 16:26     ` John Ogness
2022-01-25 15:04     ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pmoh3yf9.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome