From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] printk: Drop console_sem during panic
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:18:42 +0106 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmoh3yf9.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220121190222.572694-5-stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
On 2022-01-21, Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com> wrote:
> If another CPU is in panic, we are about to be halted. Try to gracefully
> drop console_sem and allow the panic CPU to grab it easily.
>
> Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index ca253ac07615..c2dc8ebd9509 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -2668,7 +2668,7 @@ void console_unlock(void)
>
> for (;;) {
> size_t ext_len = 0;
> - int handover;
> + int handover, pcpu;
> size_t len;
>
> skip:
> @@ -2739,6 +2739,12 @@ void console_unlock(void)
> if (handover)
> return;
>
> + /* Allow panic_cpu to take over the consoles safely */
> + pcpu = atomic_read(&panic_cpu);
> + if (unlikely(pcpu != PANIC_CPU_INVALID &&
> + pcpu != raw_smp_processor_id()))
> + break;
> +
Keep in mind that after the "break", this context will try to re-acquire
the console lock and continue printing. That is a pretty small window
for the panic CPU to attempt a trylock.
Perhaps the retry after the loop should also be avoided for non-panic
CPUs. This would rely on the panic CPU taking over (as your comment
suggests will happen). Since the panic-CPU calls pr_emerg() as the final
record before drifting off to neverland, that is probably OK.
Something like:
@@ -2731,7 +2731,8 @@ void console_unlock(void)
* there's a new owner and the console_unlock() from them will do the
* flush, no worries.
*/
- retry = prb_read_valid(prb, next_seq, NULL);
+ retry = (pcpu != raw_smp_processor_id()) &&
+ prb_read_valid(prb, next_seq, NULL);
if (retry && console_trylock())
goto again;
}
I would also like to see a comment about why it is acceptable to use
raw_smp_processor_id() in a context that has migration
enabled. Something like: raw_smp_processor_id() can be used because this
context cannot be migrated to the panic CPU.
John Ogness
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-24 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-21 19:02 [PATCH 0/4] printk: reduce deadlocks " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] panic: Add panic_in_progress helper Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 11:48 ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-26 17:37 ` Stephen Brennan
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: disable optimistic spin during panic Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 12:42 ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-26 9:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-26 9:45 ` John Ogness
2022-01-26 10:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-26 18:15 ` Stephen Brennan
2022-01-27 7:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-01-27 9:09 ` John Ogness
2022-01-27 11:38 ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-27 12:43 ` John Ogness
2022-01-27 14:25 ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: Avoid livelock with heavy printk " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-25 14:25 ` Petr Mladek
2022-01-21 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] printk: Drop console_sem " Stephen Brennan
2022-01-24 16:12 ` John Ogness [this message]
2022-01-24 16:26 ` John Ogness
2022-01-25 15:04 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmoh3yf9.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome