mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
To: "Liu Ying" <victor.liu@nxp.com>
Cc: "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	"Robert Foss" <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	"Laurent Pinchart" <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	"Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	"Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"Robert Chiras" <robert.chiras@nxp.com>,
	"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Oliver F. Brown" <oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:18:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87qzhbbg5r.fsf@geanix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atH4i_KcmccKb8Ge@raspi>

Sorry for the premature send of the previous reply.


"Liu Ying" <victor.liu@nxp.com> writes:

>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
>> index f3f4334136c0..eb604733eea0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>>  #include <linux/sys_soc.h>
>>  #include <linux/time64.h>
>> +#include <linux/math64.h>
>
> Sort the header files alphabetically.

Will do.

>> +	hfp = roundup(hfp, 2);
>> +	hbp = roundup(hbp, 2);
>> +	hsa = roundup(hsa, 2);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We need to subtract the packet header length: 32
>> +	 * In order to make sure we don't get negative values,
>> +	 * subtract a proportional value to the total length of the
>> +	 * horizontal blanking duration.
>> +	 */
>> +	h_blank = hfp + hbp + hsa;
>> +
>> +	if (h_blank) {
>> +		pkt_len = min(hfp, roundup(((hfp * 100 / h_blank) * 32) / 100, 2));
>> +		pkt_hdr_len = pkt_len;
>> +		hfp -= pkt_len;
>> +
>> +		pkt_len = min(hbp, roundup(((hbp * 100 / h_blank) * 32) / 100, 2));
>> +		pkt_hdr_len += pkt_len;
>> +		hbp -= pkt_len;
>> +
>> +		pkt_len = min(hsa, 32 - pkt_hdr_len);
>> +		pkt_hdr_len += pkt_len;
>> +		hsa -= pkt_len;
>> +		if (pkt_hdr_len != 32)
>> +			dev_warn(dsi->dev,
>> +				 "Unable to subtract packet header length fully: %d left\n",
>> +				 32 - pkt_hdr_len);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dsi->dev, "Register values: hfp=%d hbp=%d hsa=%d\n", hfp, hbp, hsa);
>> +
>> +	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HFP, hfp);
>> +	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HBP, hbp);
>> +	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HSA, hsa);
>>
>>  	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_ENABLE_MULT_PKTS, 0x0);
>>  	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_BLLP_MODE, 0x1);
>>
>> --
>> 2.56.0
>>
>
> Not sure if the fix is 100% correct, but it is a correct direction to
> change the blanking packet payload size from in pixel clocks to in bytes,
> so better than no fix:
> Acked-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>

Thanks. With the information available to me, this is the best I can do.

/Esben

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-27 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14  7:44 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Various fixes Esben Haabendal
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Cleanup endpoint mux control selection Esben Haabendal
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 2/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Limit LCDIF specific sync override Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 3/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct auto-insert EOTP behavior Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-15 15:18     ` Frank Li
2026-10-16 10:12   ` Liu Ying
2026-10-27 10:14     ` Esben Haabendal
2026-10-27 10:18     ` Esben Haabendal [this message]
2026-10-25  6:55   ` Sebastian Krzyszkowiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87qzhbbg5r.fsf@geanix.com \
    --to=esben@geanix.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.chiras@nxp.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=victor.liu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®