From: Liu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>
To: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
Cc: "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
"Robert Foss" <rfoss@kernel.org>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Robert Chiras" <robert.chiras@nxp.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Oliver F. Brown" <oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:12:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atH4i_KcmccKb8Ge@raspi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014-nwl-dsi-fixes-v4-4-b9138ea5e12c@geanix.com>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 09:44:45AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> The NWL MIPI Host controller registers specifies the horizontal front
> porch, sync pulse, and back porch in DSI packet payload size in bytes (ie.
> not in pixel clocks).
>
> The calculation for this is (mostly) described in section 13.6.3.5.1.2 of
> the i.MX 8M Dual/8M QuadLite/8M Quad Applications Processors Reference
> Manual (rev. 3.1). The formula shown there does not take packet header size
> into account though.
>
> The formula implemented here converts the hfp, hsa, and hbp to DSI packet
> bytes and then subtracts the number of packet header bytes.
>
> It is worth noting that these values only needs to match approximately,
> according to the reference manual.
>
> Based on commit in NXP vendor tree
> commit f2a61699749d ("LF-7981-4: drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing")
>
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
> Cc: Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@nxp.com>
> Cc: Oliver F. Brown <oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com>
Worth a Fixes tag?
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> index f3f4334136c0..eb604733eea0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> #include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> #include <linux/time64.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
Sort the header files alphabetically.
>
> #include <drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
> @@ -264,6 +265,9 @@ static int nwl_dsi_config_dpi(struct nwl_dsi *dsi)
> bool burst_mode;
> int hfront_porch, hback_porch, vfront_porch, vback_porch;
> int hsync_len, vsync_len;
> + int hfp, hbp, hsa;
> + u64 hs_clk_rate, pclk_rate;
> + int h_blank, pkt_hdr_len, pkt_len;
>
> hfront_porch = dsi->mode.hsync_start - dsi->mode.hdisplay;
> hsync_len = dsi->mode.hsync_end - dsi->mode.hsync_start;
> @@ -317,9 +321,59 @@ static int nwl_dsi_config_dpi(struct nwl_dsi *dsi)
> dsi->mode.hdisplay);
> }
>
> - nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HFP, hfront_porch);
> - nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HBP, hback_porch);
> - nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HSA, hsync_len);
> + hs_clk_rate = dsi->phy_cfg.mipi_dphy.hs_clk_rate;
> + pclk_rate = (u64)dsi->mode.clock * 1000;
> + DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dsi->dev, "hs_clk_rate: %llu Hz\n", hs_clk_rate);
> +
> + /*
> + * Calculate the bytes needed, according to the RM formula:
> + * Time of DPI event = time to transmit x number of bytes on the DSI interface
> + * dpi_event_size * dpi_pclk_period = dsi_bytes * 8 * hs_bit_period / num_lanes
> + * ===>
> + * dsi_bytes = dpi_event_size * dpi_pclk_period * num_lanes / (8 * hs_bit_period)
> + * ===> (substituting period = 1 / rate)
> + * dsi_bytes = dpi_event_size * num_lanes * hs_clk_rate / (8 * dpi_pclk_rate)
> + */
> + hfp = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)hfront_porch * dsi->lanes * hs_clk_rate, 8 * pclk_rate);
> + hbp = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)hback_porch * dsi->lanes * hs_clk_rate, 8 * pclk_rate);
> + hsa = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)hsync_len * dsi->lanes * hs_clk_rate, 8 * pclk_rate);
> +
> + /* Make sure horizontal blankins are even numbers */
s/blankins/blankings/
> + hfp = roundup(hfp, 2);
> + hbp = roundup(hbp, 2);
> + hsa = roundup(hsa, 2);
> +
> + /*
> + * We need to subtract the packet header length: 32
> + * In order to make sure we don't get negative values,
> + * subtract a proportional value to the total length of the
> + * horizontal blanking duration.
> + */
> + h_blank = hfp + hbp + hsa;
> +
> + if (h_blank) {
> + pkt_len = min(hfp, roundup(((hfp * 100 / h_blank) * 32) / 100, 2));
> + pkt_hdr_len = pkt_len;
> + hfp -= pkt_len;
> +
> + pkt_len = min(hbp, roundup(((hbp * 100 / h_blank) * 32) / 100, 2));
> + pkt_hdr_len += pkt_len;
> + hbp -= pkt_len;
> +
> + pkt_len = min(hsa, 32 - pkt_hdr_len);
> + pkt_hdr_len += pkt_len;
> + hsa -= pkt_len;
> + if (pkt_hdr_len != 32)
> + dev_warn(dsi->dev,
> + "Unable to subtract packet header length fully: %d left\n",
> + 32 - pkt_hdr_len);
> + }
> +
> + DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dsi->dev, "Register values: hfp=%d hbp=%d hsa=%d\n", hfp, hbp, hsa);
> +
> + nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HFP, hfp);
> + nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HBP, hbp);
> + nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HSA, hsa);
>
> nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_ENABLE_MULT_PKTS, 0x0);
> nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_BLLP_MODE, 0x1);
>
> --
> 2.56.0
>
Not sure if the fix is 100% correct, but it is a correct direction to
change the blanking packet payload size from in pixel clocks to in bytes,
so better than no fix:
Acked-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>
--
Regards,
Liu Ying
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 7:44 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Various fixes Esben Haabendal
2026-10-14 7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Cleanup endpoint mux control selection Esben Haabendal
2026-10-14 7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 2/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Limit LCDIF specific sync override Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54 ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-14 7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 3/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct auto-insert EOTP behavior Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54 ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-14 7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54 ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-15 15:18 ` Frank Li
2026-10-16 10:12 ` Liu Ying [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atH4i_KcmccKb8Ge@raspi \
--to=victor.liu@nxp.com \
--cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=esben@geanix.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.chiras@nxp.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®