mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>
To: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
Cc: "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	"Robert Foss" <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	"Laurent Pinchart" <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	"Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	"Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"Robert Chiras" <robert.chiras@nxp.com>,
	"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Oliver F. Brown" <oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:12:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atH4i_KcmccKb8Ge@raspi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014-nwl-dsi-fixes-v4-4-b9138ea5e12c@geanix.com>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 09:44:45AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> The NWL MIPI Host controller registers specifies the horizontal front
> porch, sync pulse, and back porch in DSI packet payload size in bytes (ie.
> not in pixel clocks).
> 
> The calculation for this is (mostly) described in section 13.6.3.5.1.2 of
> the i.MX 8M Dual/8M QuadLite/8M Quad Applications Processors Reference
> Manual (rev. 3.1). The formula shown there does not take packet header size
> into account though.
> 
> The formula implemented here converts the hfp, hsa, and hbp to DSI packet
> bytes and then subtracts the number of packet header bytes.
> 
> It is worth noting that these values only needs to match approximately,
> according to the reference manual.
> 
> Based on commit in NXP vendor tree
> commit f2a61699749d ("LF-7981-4: drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
> Cc: Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@nxp.com>
> Cc: Oliver F. Brown <oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com>

Worth a Fixes tag?

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> index f3f4334136c0..eb604733eea0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>  #include <linux/sys_soc.h>
>  #include <linux/time64.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>

Sort the header files alphabetically.

>  
>  #include <drm/drm_atomic_state_helper.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
> @@ -264,6 +265,9 @@ static int nwl_dsi_config_dpi(struct nwl_dsi *dsi)
>  	bool burst_mode;
>  	int hfront_porch, hback_porch, vfront_porch, vback_porch;
>  	int hsync_len, vsync_len;
> +	int hfp, hbp, hsa;
> +	u64 hs_clk_rate, pclk_rate;
> +	int h_blank, pkt_hdr_len, pkt_len;
>  
>  	hfront_porch = dsi->mode.hsync_start - dsi->mode.hdisplay;
>  	hsync_len = dsi->mode.hsync_end - dsi->mode.hsync_start;
> @@ -317,9 +321,59 @@ static int nwl_dsi_config_dpi(struct nwl_dsi *dsi)
>  			      dsi->mode.hdisplay);
>  	}
>  
> -	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HFP, hfront_porch);
> -	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HBP, hback_porch);
> -	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HSA, hsync_len);
> +	hs_clk_rate = dsi->phy_cfg.mipi_dphy.hs_clk_rate;
> +	pclk_rate = (u64)dsi->mode.clock * 1000;
> +	DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dsi->dev, "hs_clk_rate: %llu Hz\n", hs_clk_rate);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate the bytes needed, according to the RM formula:
> +	 * Time of DPI event = time to transmit x number of bytes on the DSI interface
> +	 * dpi_event_size * dpi_pclk_period = dsi_bytes * 8 * hs_bit_period / num_lanes
> +	 * ===>
> +	 * dsi_bytes = dpi_event_size * dpi_pclk_period * num_lanes / (8 * hs_bit_period)
> +	 * ===> (substituting period = 1 / rate)
> +	 * dsi_bytes = dpi_event_size * num_lanes * hs_clk_rate / (8 * dpi_pclk_rate)
> +	 */
> +	hfp = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)hfront_porch * dsi->lanes * hs_clk_rate, 8 * pclk_rate);
> +	hbp = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)hback_porch * dsi->lanes * hs_clk_rate, 8 * pclk_rate);
> +	hsa = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)hsync_len * dsi->lanes * hs_clk_rate, 8 * pclk_rate);
> +
> +	/* Make sure horizontal blankins are even numbers */

s/blankins/blankings/

> +	hfp = roundup(hfp, 2);
> +	hbp = roundup(hbp, 2);
> +	hsa = roundup(hsa, 2);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We need to subtract the packet header length: 32
> +	 * In order to make sure we don't get negative values,
> +	 * subtract a proportional value to the total length of the
> +	 * horizontal blanking duration.
> +	 */
> +	h_blank = hfp + hbp + hsa;
> +
> +	if (h_blank) {
> +		pkt_len = min(hfp, roundup(((hfp * 100 / h_blank) * 32) / 100, 2));
> +		pkt_hdr_len = pkt_len;
> +		hfp -= pkt_len;
> +
> +		pkt_len = min(hbp, roundup(((hbp * 100 / h_blank) * 32) / 100, 2));
> +		pkt_hdr_len += pkt_len;
> +		hbp -= pkt_len;
> +
> +		pkt_len = min(hsa, 32 - pkt_hdr_len);
> +		pkt_hdr_len += pkt_len;
> +		hsa -= pkt_len;
> +		if (pkt_hdr_len != 32)
> +			dev_warn(dsi->dev,
> +				 "Unable to subtract packet header length fully: %d left\n",
> +				 32 - pkt_hdr_len);
> +	}
> +
> +	DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dsi->dev, "Register values: hfp=%d hbp=%d hsa=%d\n", hfp, hbp, hsa);
> +
> +	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HFP, hfp);
> +	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HBP, hbp);
> +	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_HSA, hsa);
>  
>  	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_ENABLE_MULT_PKTS, 0x0);
>  	nwl_dsi_write(dsi, NWL_DSI_BLLP_MODE, 0x1);
> 
> -- 
> 2.56.0
> 

Not sure if the fix is 100% correct, but it is a correct direction to
change the blanking packet payload size from in pixel clocks to in bytes,
so better than no fix:
Acked-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>

-- 
Regards,
Liu Ying

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14  7:44 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Various fixes Esben Haabendal
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Cleanup endpoint mux control selection Esben Haabendal
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 2/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Limit LCDIF specific sync override Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 3/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct auto-insert EOTP behavior Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-14  7:44 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Correct MIPI DSI horizontal sync timing Esben Haabendal
2026-10-15 13:54   ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-10-15 15:18     ` Frank Li
2026-10-16 10:12   ` Liu Ying [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atH4i_KcmccKb8Ge@raspi \
    --to=victor.liu@nxp.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=esben@geanix.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=oliver.brown@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.chiras@nxp.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®