From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Dmitri Prokhorov <Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com>,
Valery Cherepennikov <valery.cherepennikov@intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:54:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r2w2zeh8.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <edf9ed7e-a4d0-dbce-53cc-883f9ab40957@linux.intel.com>
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> writes:
> This patch implements mux switch that triggers skipping to the
> current CPU's events list at mulitplexing hrtimer interrupt
> handler as well as adoption of the switch in the existing
> implementation.
>
> perf_event_groups_iterate_cpu() API is introduced to implement
> iteration thru the certain CPU groups list skipping groups
"through"
> allocated for the other CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 08ccfb2..aeb0f81 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ void perf_sample_event_took(u64 sample_len_ns)
> static atomic64_t perf_event_id;
>
> static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> - enum event_type_t event_type);
> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux);
>
> static void cpu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> enum event_type_t event_type,
> - struct task_struct *task);
> + struct task_struct *task, int mux);
>
> static void update_context_time(struct perf_event_context *ctx);
> static u64 perf_event_time(struct perf_event *event);
> @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
> struct list_head *list;
> unsigned long flags;
> + int mux = 0;
>
> /*
> * Disable interrupts and preemption to avoid this CPU's
> @@ -717,7 +718,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
> perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>
> if (mode & PERF_CGROUP_SWOUT) {
> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, mux);
> /*
> * must not be done before ctxswout due
> * to event_filter_match() in event_sched_out()
> @@ -736,7 +737,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
> */
> cpuctx->cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task,
> &cpuctx->ctx);
> - cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, task);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, task, mux);
'mux' is always zero in this function, isn't it?
> }
> perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
> perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
> @@ -1613,8 +1614,16 @@ perf_event_groups_rotate(struct rb_root *groups, int cpu)
> */
> #define perf_event_groups_for_each(event, iter, tree, node, list, link) \
> for (iter = rb_first(tree); iter; iter = rb_next(iter)) \
> - list_for_each_entry(event, &(rb_entry(iter, \
> - typeof(*event), node)->list), link)
> + list_for_each_entry(event, &(rb_entry(iter, \
> + typeof(*event), node)->list), link)
Is this an indentation change? What is it doing here?
> +
> +/*
> + * Iterate event groups related to specific cpu.
> + */
> +#define perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu, tree, list, link) \
> + list = perf_event_groups_get_list(tree, cpu); \
> + if (list) \
> + list_for_each_entry(event, list, link)
..or not, if there's no list.
>
> /*
> * Add a event from the lists for its context.
> @@ -2397,36 +2406,38 @@ static void add_event_to_ctx(struct perf_event *event,
>
> static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> - enum event_type_t event_type);
> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux);
> static void
> ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> enum event_type_t event_type,
> - struct task_struct *task);
> + struct task_struct *task, int mux);
>
> static void task_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> enum event_type_t event_type)
> {
> + int mux = 0;
> +
> if (!cpuctx->task_ctx)
> return;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx != cpuctx->task_ctx))
> return;
>
> - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, event_type);
> + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, mux);
Just use 0.
> }
>
> static void perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> - struct task_struct *task)
> + struct task_struct *task, int mux)
> {
> - cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task, mux);
> if (ctx)
> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task);
> - cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task);
> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task, mux);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task, mux);
> if (ctx)
> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task);
> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task, mux);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2450,6 +2461,7 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> {
> enum event_type_t ctx_event_type = event_type & EVENT_ALL;
> bool cpu_event = !!(event_type & EVENT_CPU);
> + int mux = 0;
>
> /*
> * If pinned groups are involved, flexible groups also need to be
> @@ -2470,11 +2482,11 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> * - otherwise, do nothing more.
> */
> if (cpu_event)
> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx_event_type);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx_event_type, mux);
> else if (ctx_event_type & EVENT_PINNED)
> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
>
> - perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current);
> + perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current, mux);
Also mux==0 in all cases in this function.
> perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
> }
>
> @@ -2491,7 +2503,7 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
> struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
> bool reprogram = true;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret = 0, mux =0;
>
> raw_spin_lock(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
> if (ctx->task) {
> @@ -2518,7 +2530,7 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
> }
>
> if (reprogram) {
> - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
> + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, mux);
> add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
> ctx_resched(cpuctx, task_ctx, get_event_type(event));
> } else {
> @@ -2655,13 +2667,14 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
> {
> struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
> struct perf_event_context *task_ctx;
> + int mux = 0;
>
> if (event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE ||
> event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR)
> return;
>
> if (ctx->is_active)
> - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
> + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, mux);
>
> __perf_event_mark_enabled(event);
>
> @@ -2671,7 +2684,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
> if (!event_filter_match(event)) {
> if (is_cgroup_event(event))
> perf_cgroup_defer_enabled(event);
> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current);
> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current, mux);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -2680,7 +2693,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
> * then don't put it on unless the group is on.
> */
> if (leader != event && leader->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current);
> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current, mux);
And here.
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -2876,11 +2889,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_refresh);
>
> static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> - enum event_type_t event_type)
> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux)
> {
> int is_active = ctx->is_active;
> + struct list_head *group_list;
> struct perf_event *event;
> struct rb_node *node;
> + int sw = -1, cpu = smp_processor_id();
Same thing seems to be happening with 'sw'.
> lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
>
> if (likely(!ctx->nr_events)) {
> @@ -2926,17 +2941,47 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>
> perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
>
> - if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED)
> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> - &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
> - group_list, group_entry)
> - group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
> + if (mux) {
So it's 'rotate', really.
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + } else {
> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> + &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + }
> + }
>
> - if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE)
> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> - &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
> - group_list, group_entry)
> - group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE) {
> + if (mux) {
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + } else {
> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> + &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + }
> + }
>
> perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
> }
> @@ -3225,9 +3270,9 @@ void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
> * Called with IRQs disabled
> */
> static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> - enum event_type_t event_type)
> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux)
> {
> - ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, cpuctx, event_type);
> + ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, cpuctx, event_type, mux);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -3287,11 +3332,13 @@ static void
> ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> enum event_type_t event_type,
> - struct task_struct *task)
> + struct task_struct *task, int mux)
> {
> int is_active = ctx->is_active;
> + struct list_head *group_list;
> struct perf_event *event;
> struct rb_node *node;
> + int sw = -1, cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
>
> @@ -3319,35 +3366,69 @@ ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> * First go through the list and put on any pinned groups
> * in order to give them the best chance of going on.
> */
> - if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED)
> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> - &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
> - group_list, group_entry)
> - ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
> + if (mux) {
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + } else {
> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> + &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
> + }
> + }
> + }
>
> /* Then walk through the lower prio flexible groups */
> if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE) {
> int can_add_hw = 1;
> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> - &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
> - group_list, group_entry)
> - ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, &can_add_hw);
> + if (mux) {
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
> + ctx, &can_add_hw);
> + }
> + can_add_hw = 1;
> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
> + ctx, &can_add_hw);
> + }
> + } else {
> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
> + &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
> + group_list, group_entry) {
> + ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
> + ctx, &can_add_hw);
> + }
> + }
> }
> }
>
> static void cpu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> enum event_type_t event_type,
> - struct task_struct *task)
> + struct task_struct *task, int mux)
> {
> struct perf_event_context *ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
>
> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, task);
> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, task, mux);
> }
>
> static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> struct task_struct *task)
> {
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
> + int mux = 0;
>
> cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
> if (cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx)
> @@ -3371,8 +3452,8 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> * events, no need to flip the cpuctx's events around.
> */
> if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ctx->pinned_groups))
> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
> - perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, task);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
> + perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, task, mux);
> perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
>
> unlock:
> @@ -3618,7 +3699,7 @@ static void rotate_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> {
> struct perf_event_context *ctx = NULL;
> - int rotate = 0;
> + int rotate = 0, mux = 1;
>
> if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events) {
> if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events != cpuctx->ctx.nr_active)
> @@ -3637,15 +3718,15 @@ static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
> perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>
> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
It's '1'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 8:11 [PATCH v6 0/3] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 20:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 7:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:32 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 16:27 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 17:39 ` Andi Kleen
2017-08-07 18:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 18:13 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-15 17:28 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 13:39 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 14:18 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-29 13:51 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 8:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-30 10:18 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 10:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-30 11:13 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 11:16 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:22 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/3]: perf/core: use context tstamp_data for skipped events on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:58 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 18:47 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 14:25 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:23 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-10 15:57 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-22 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 8:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 17:18 ` [RFC][PATCH] perf: Rewrite enabled/running timekeeping Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-31 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05 7:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 10:45 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 11:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 21:03 ` Vince Weaver
2017-09-04 10:46 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 14:56 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 10:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-11 6:55 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 13:48 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-08 8:47 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-03-12 17:43 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/cor: Use RB trees for pinned/flexible groups tip-bot for Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/3]: perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:17 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:17 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 17:23 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:54 ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
2017-08-23 18:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-22 20:21 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 8:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r2w2zeh8.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=valery.cherepennikov@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome