From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Dmitri Prokhorov <Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com>,
Valery Cherepennikov <valery.cherepennikov@intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:12:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7fa57c2-fc86-a21c-9380-5ab1ecc53fe7@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r2w2zeh8.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 23.08.2017 14:54, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> This patch implements mux switch that triggers skipping to the
>> current CPU's events list at mulitplexing hrtimer interrupt
>> handler as well as adoption of the switch in the existing
>> implementation.
>>
>> perf_event_groups_iterate_cpu() API is introduced to implement
>> iteration thru the certain CPU groups list skipping groups
>
> "through"
>
>> allocated for the other CPUs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/events/core.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index 08ccfb2..aeb0f81 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ void perf_sample_event_took(u64 sample_len_ns)
>> static atomic64_t perf_event_id;
>>
>> static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> - enum event_type_t event_type);
>> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux);
>>
>> static void cpu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> enum event_type_t event_type,
>> - struct task_struct *task);
>> + struct task_struct *task, int mux);
>>
>> static void update_context_time(struct perf_event_context *ctx);
>> static u64 perf_event_time(struct perf_event *event);
>> @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
>> struct list_head *list;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> + int mux = 0;
>>
>> /*
>> * Disable interrupts and preemption to avoid this CPU's
>> @@ -717,7 +718,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
>> perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>>
>> if (mode & PERF_CGROUP_SWOUT) {
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, mux);
>> /*
>> * must not be done before ctxswout due
>> * to event_filter_match() in event_sched_out()
>> @@ -736,7 +737,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
>> */
>> cpuctx->cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task,
>> &cpuctx->ctx);
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, task);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, task, mux);
>
> 'mux' is always zero in this function, isn't it?
>
>> }
>> perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>> perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
>> @@ -1613,8 +1614,16 @@ perf_event_groups_rotate(struct rb_root *groups, int cpu)
>> */
>> #define perf_event_groups_for_each(event, iter, tree, node, list, link) \
>> for (iter = rb_first(tree); iter; iter = rb_next(iter)) \
>> - list_for_each_entry(event, &(rb_entry(iter, \
>> - typeof(*event), node)->list), link)
>> + list_for_each_entry(event, &(rb_entry(iter, \
>> + typeof(*event), node)->list), link)
>
> Is this an indentation change? What is it doing here?
>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Iterate event groups related to specific cpu.
>> + */
>> +#define perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu, tree, list, link) \
>> + list = perf_event_groups_get_list(tree, cpu); \
>> + if (list) \
>> + list_for_each_entry(event, list, link)
>
> ..or not, if there's no list.
>
>>
>> /*
>> * Add a event from the lists for its context.
>> @@ -2397,36 +2406,38 @@ static void add_event_to_ctx(struct perf_event *event,
>>
>> static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> - enum event_type_t event_type);
>> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux);
>> static void
>> ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> enum event_type_t event_type,
>> - struct task_struct *task);
>> + struct task_struct *task, int mux);
>>
>> static void task_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> enum event_type_t event_type)
>> {
>> + int mux = 0;
>> +
>> if (!cpuctx->task_ctx)
>> return;
>>
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx != cpuctx->task_ctx))
>> return;
>>
>> - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, event_type);
>> + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, mux);
>
> Just use 0.
Well, I intentionally made this ugly switch named over local variable
to add clarity into the code so I simply wonder - why do you prefer
the unnamed variant?
>
>> }
>>
>> static void perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> - struct task_struct *task)
>> + struct task_struct *task, int mux)
>> {
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task, mux);
>> if (ctx)
>> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task);
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task);
>> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task, mux);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task, mux);
>> if (ctx)
>> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task);
>> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task, mux);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2450,6 +2461,7 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> {
>> enum event_type_t ctx_event_type = event_type & EVENT_ALL;
>> bool cpu_event = !!(event_type & EVENT_CPU);
>> + int mux = 0;
>>
>> /*
>> * If pinned groups are involved, flexible groups also need to be
>> @@ -2470,11 +2482,11 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> * - otherwise, do nothing more.
>> */
>> if (cpu_event)
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx_event_type);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx_event_type, mux);
>> else if (ctx_event_type & EVENT_PINNED)
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
>>
>> - perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current);
>> + perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current, mux);
>
> Also mux==0 in all cases in this function.
>
>> perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2491,7 +2503,7 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
>> struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
>> bool reprogram = true;
>> - int ret = 0;
>> + int ret = 0, mux =0;
>>
>> raw_spin_lock(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
>> if (ctx->task) {
>> @@ -2518,7 +2530,7 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
>> }
>>
>> if (reprogram) {
>> - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
>> + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, mux);
>> add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
>> ctx_resched(cpuctx, task_ctx, get_event_type(event));
>> } else {
>> @@ -2655,13 +2667,14 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
>> {
>> struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
>> struct perf_event_context *task_ctx;
>> + int mux = 0;
>>
>> if (event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE ||
>> event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR)
>> return;
>>
>> if (ctx->is_active)
>> - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
>> + ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, mux);
>>
>> __perf_event_mark_enabled(event);
>>
>> @@ -2671,7 +2684,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
>> if (!event_filter_match(event)) {
>> if (is_cgroup_event(event))
>> perf_cgroup_defer_enabled(event);
>> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current);
>> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current, mux);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2680,7 +2693,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
>> * then don't put it on unless the group is on.
>> */
>> if (leader != event && leader->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current);
>> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current, mux);
>
> And here.
>
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2876,11 +2889,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_refresh);
>>
>> static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> - enum event_type_t event_type)
>> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux)
>> {
>> int is_active = ctx->is_active;
>> + struct list_head *group_list;
>> struct perf_event *event;
>> struct rb_node *node;
>> + int sw = -1, cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> Same thing seems to be happening with 'sw'.
>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
>>
>> if (likely(!ctx->nr_events)) {
>> @@ -2926,17 +2941,47 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>
>> perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
>>
>> - if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED)
>> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> - &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> - group_list, group_entry)
>> - group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
>> + if (mux) {
>
> So it's 'rotate', really.
Which 'rotate' do you mean? If the local variable from
perf_rotate_context() then yes - it may be passed to this function
call from there as mux value, but logically they are still different.
>
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> + &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> - if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE)
>> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> - &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> - group_list, group_entry)
>> - group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE) {
>> + if (mux) {
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> + &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
>> }
>> @@ -3225,9 +3270,9 @@ void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
>> * Called with IRQs disabled
>> */
>> static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> - enum event_type_t event_type)
>> + enum event_type_t event_type, int mux)
>> {
>> - ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, cpuctx, event_type);
>> + ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, cpuctx, event_type, mux);
>> }
>>
>> static void
>> @@ -3287,11 +3332,13 @@ static void
>> ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> enum event_type_t event_type,
>> - struct task_struct *task)
>> + struct task_struct *task, int mux)
>> {
>> int is_active = ctx->is_active;
>> + struct list_head *group_list;
>> struct perf_event *event;
>> struct rb_node *node;
>> + int sw = -1, cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
>>
>> @@ -3319,35 +3366,69 @@ ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> * First go through the list and put on any pinned groups
>> * in order to give them the best chance of going on.
>> */
>> - if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED)
>> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> - &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> - group_list, group_entry)
>> - ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
>> + if (mux) {
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> + &ctx->pinned_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> + &ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> /* Then walk through the lower prio flexible groups */
>> if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE) {
>> int can_add_hw = 1;
>> - perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> - &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> - group_list, group_entry)
>> - ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> + if (mux) {
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
>> + ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> + }
>> + can_add_hw = 1;
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> + &ctx->flexible_groups,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
>> + ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> + &ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> + group_list, group_entry) {
>> + ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
>> + ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> static void cpu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> enum event_type_t event_type,
>> - struct task_struct *task)
>> + struct task_struct *task, int mux)
>> {
>> struct perf_event_context *ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
>>
>> - ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, task);
>> + ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, task, mux);
>> }
>>
>> static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> struct task_struct *task)
>> {
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
>> + int mux = 0;
>>
>> cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
>> if (cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx)
>> @@ -3371,8 +3452,8 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> * events, no need to flip the cpuctx's events around.
>> */
>> if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ctx->pinned_groups))
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>> - perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, task);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
>> + perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, task, mux);
>> perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
>>
>> unlock:
>> @@ -3618,7 +3699,7 @@ static void rotate_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>> static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
>> {
>> struct perf_event_context *ctx = NULL;
>> - int rotate = 0;
>> + int rotate = 0, mux = 1;
>>
>> if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events) {
>> if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events != cpuctx->ctx.nr_active)
>> @@ -3637,15 +3718,15 @@ static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
>> perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
>> perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>>
>> - cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>> + cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
>
> It's '1'.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 8:11 [PATCH v6 0/3] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 20:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 7:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:32 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 16:27 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 17:39 ` Andi Kleen
2017-08-07 18:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 18:13 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-15 17:28 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 13:39 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 14:18 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-29 13:51 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 8:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-30 10:18 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 10:30 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-30 11:13 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 11:16 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:22 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/3]: perf/core: use context tstamp_data for skipped events on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:58 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 18:47 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 14:25 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:23 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-10 15:57 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-22 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 8:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 17:18 ` [RFC][PATCH] perf: Rewrite enabled/running timekeeping Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-31 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05 7:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 10:45 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 11:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 21:03 ` Vince Weaver
2017-09-04 10:46 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 14:56 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 10:17 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-11 6:55 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 13:48 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-08 8:47 ` Alexey Budankov
2018-03-12 17:43 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/cor: Use RB trees for pinned/flexible groups tip-bot for Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02 8:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/3]: perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:17 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:17 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 17:23 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18 5:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:54 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 18:12 ` Alexey Budankov [this message]
2017-08-22 20:21 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23 8:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12 ` Alexey Budankov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7fa57c2-fc86-a21c-9380-5ab1ecc53fe7@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=valery.cherepennikov@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®