mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Dmitri Prokhorov <Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com>,
	Valery Cherepennikov <valery.cherepennikov@intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:12:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7fa57c2-fc86-a21c-9380-5ab1ecc53fe7@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r2w2zeh8.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 23.08.2017 14:54, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> writes:
> 
>> This patch implements mux switch that triggers skipping to the 
>> current CPU's events list at mulitplexing hrtimer interrupt 
>> handler as well as adoption of the switch in the existing 
>> implementation.
>>
>> perf_event_groups_iterate_cpu() API is introduced to implement 
>> iteration thru the certain CPU groups list skipping groups 
> 
> "through"
> 
>> allocated for the other CPUs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/events/core.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index 08ccfb2..aeb0f81 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ void perf_sample_event_took(u64 sample_len_ns)
>>  static atomic64_t perf_event_id;
>>  
>>  static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> -			      enum event_type_t event_type);
>> +			      enum event_type_t event_type, int mux);
>>  
>>  static void cpu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  			     enum event_type_t event_type,
>> -			     struct task_struct *task);
>> +			     struct task_struct *task, int mux);
>>  
>>  static void update_context_time(struct perf_event_context *ctx);
>>  static u64 perf_event_time(struct perf_event *event);
>> @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
>>  	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
>>  	struct list_head *list;
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>> +	int mux = 0;
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Disable interrupts and preemption to avoid this CPU's
>> @@ -717,7 +718,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
>>  		perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>>  
>>  		if (mode & PERF_CGROUP_SWOUT) {
>> -			cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL);
>> +			cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, mux);
>>  			/*
>>  			 * must not be done before ctxswout due
>>  			 * to event_filter_match() in event_sched_out()
>> @@ -736,7 +737,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task, int mode)
>>  			 */
>>  			cpuctx->cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task,
>>  							     &cpuctx->ctx);
>> -			cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, task);
>> +			cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_ALL, task, mux);
> 
> 'mux' is always zero in this function, isn't it?
> 
>>  		}
>>  		perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>>  		perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
>> @@ -1613,8 +1614,16 @@ perf_event_groups_rotate(struct rb_root *groups, int cpu)
>>   */
>>  #define perf_event_groups_for_each(event, iter, tree, node, list, link) \
>>  	   for (iter = rb_first(tree); iter; iter = rb_next(iter))	\
>> -		list_for_each_entry(event, &(rb_entry(iter,		\
>> -			typeof(*event), node)->list), link)
>> +		list_for_each_entry(event, &(rb_entry(iter, 		\
>> +				typeof(*event), node)->list), link)
> 
> Is this an indentation change? What is it doing here?
> 
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Iterate event groups related to specific cpu.
>> + */
>> +#define perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu, tree, list, link)	\
>> +		list = perf_event_groups_get_list(tree, cpu);		\
>> +		if (list)						\
>> +			list_for_each_entry(event, list, link)
> 
> ..or not, if there's no list.
> 
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Add a event from the lists for its context.
>> @@ -2397,36 +2406,38 @@ static void add_event_to_ctx(struct perf_event *event,
>>  
>>  static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  			  struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> -			  enum event_type_t event_type);
>> +			  enum event_type_t event_type, int mux);
>>  static void
>>  ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  	     struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  	     enum event_type_t event_type,
>> -	     struct task_struct *task);
>> +	     struct task_struct *task, int mux);
>>  
>>  static void task_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  			       struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  			       enum event_type_t event_type)
>>  {
>> +	int mux = 0;
>> +
>>  	if (!cpuctx->task_ctx)
>>  		return;
>>  
>>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx != cpuctx->task_ctx))
>>  		return;
>>  
>> -	ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, event_type);
>> +	ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, mux);
> 
> Just use 0.

Well, I intentionally made this ugly switch named over local variable 
to add clarity into the code so I simply wonder - why do you prefer 
the unnamed variant?

> 
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  				struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>> -				struct task_struct *task)
>> +				struct task_struct *task, int mux)
>>  {
>> -	cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task);
>> +	cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task, mux);
>>  	if (ctx)
>> -		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task);
>> -	cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task);
>> +		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_PINNED, task, mux);
>> +	cpu_ctx_sched_in(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task, mux);
>>  	if (ctx)
>> -		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task);
>> +		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, task, mux);
>>  }
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -2450,6 +2461,7 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  {
>>  	enum event_type_t ctx_event_type = event_type & EVENT_ALL;
>>  	bool cpu_event = !!(event_type & EVENT_CPU);
>> +	int mux = 0;
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * If pinned groups are involved, flexible groups also need to be
>> @@ -2470,11 +2482,11 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  	 *  - otherwise, do nothing more.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (cpu_event)
>> -		cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx_event_type);
>> +		cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, ctx_event_type, mux);
>>  	else if (ctx_event_type & EVENT_PINNED)
>> -		cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>> +		cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
>>  
>> -	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current);
>> +	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current, mux);
> 
> Also mux==0 in all cases in this function.
> 
>>  	perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -2491,7 +2503,7 @@ static int  __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
>>  	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
>>  	struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
>>  	bool reprogram = true;
>> -	int ret = 0;
>> +	int ret = 0, mux =0;
>>  
>>  	raw_spin_lock(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
>>  	if (ctx->task) {
>> @@ -2518,7 +2530,7 @@ static int  __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (reprogram) {
>> -		ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
>> +		ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, mux);
>>  		add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
>>  		ctx_resched(cpuctx, task_ctx, get_event_type(event));
>>  	} else {
>> @@ -2655,13 +2667,14 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
>>  {
>>  	struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
>>  	struct perf_event_context *task_ctx;
>> +	int mux = 0;
>>  
>>  	if (event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE ||
>>  	    event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR)
>>  		return;
>>  
>>  	if (ctx->is_active)
>> -		ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
>> +		ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, mux);
>>  
>>  	__perf_event_mark_enabled(event);
>>  
>> @@ -2671,7 +2684,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
>>  	if (!event_filter_match(event)) {
>>  		if (is_cgroup_event(event))
>>  			perf_cgroup_defer_enabled(event);
>> -		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current);
>> +		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current, mux);
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -2680,7 +2693,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event,
>>  	 * then don't put it on unless the group is on.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (leader != event && leader->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>> -		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current);
>> +		ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME, current, mux);
> 
> And here.
> 
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -2876,11 +2889,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_refresh);
>>  
>>  static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  			  struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> -			  enum event_type_t event_type)
>> +			  enum event_type_t event_type, int mux)
>>  {
>>  	int is_active = ctx->is_active;
>> +	struct list_head *group_list;
>>  	struct perf_event *event;
>>  	struct rb_node *node;
>> +	int sw = -1, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> 
> Same thing seems to be happening with 'sw'.
> 
>>  	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
>>  
>>  	if (likely(!ctx->nr_events)) {
>> @@ -2926,17 +2941,47 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  
>>  	perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
>>  
>> -	if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED)
>> -		perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> -				&ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> -				group_list, group_entry)
>> -			group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +	if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
>> +		if (mux) {
> 
> So it's 'rotate', really.

Which 'rotate' do you mean? If the local variable from 
perf_rotate_context() then yes - it may be passed to this function 
call from there as mux value, but logically they are still different.

> 
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> +					&ctx->pinned_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> +					&ctx->pinned_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +		} else {
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> +					&ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  
>> -	if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE)
>> -		perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> -				&ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> -				group_list, group_entry)
>> -			group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +	if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE) {
>> +		if (mux) {
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> +					&ctx->flexible_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> +					&ctx->flexible_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +		} else {
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> +					&ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
>>  }
>> @@ -3225,9 +3270,9 @@ void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
>>   * Called with IRQs disabled
>>   */
>>  static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> -			      enum event_type_t event_type)
>> +			      enum event_type_t event_type, int mux)
>>  {
>> -	ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, cpuctx, event_type);
>> +	ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, cpuctx, event_type, mux);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void
>> @@ -3287,11 +3332,13 @@ static void
>>  ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  	     struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  	     enum event_type_t event_type,
>> -	     struct task_struct *task)
>> +	     struct task_struct *task, int mux)
>>  {
>>  	int is_active = ctx->is_active;
>> +	struct list_head *group_list;
>>  	struct perf_event *event;
>>  	struct rb_node *node;
>> +	int sw = -1, cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>  
>>  	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
>>  
>> @@ -3319,35 +3366,69 @@ ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  	 * First go through the list and put on any pinned groups
>>  	 * in order to give them the best chance of going on.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED)
>> -		perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> -				&ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> -				group_list, group_entry)
>> -			ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +	if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
>> +		if (mux) {
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> +					&ctx->pinned_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> +					&ctx->pinned_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +		} else {
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> +					&ctx->pinned_groups, group_node,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					ctx_pinned_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	/* Then walk through the lower prio flexible groups */
>>  	if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE) {
>>  		int can_add_hw = 1;
>> -		perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> -				&ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> -				group_list, group_entry)
>> -			ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx, ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> +		if (mux) {
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, sw,
>> +					&ctx->flexible_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
>> +							ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> +			}
>> +			can_add_hw = 1;
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each_cpu(event, cpu,
>> +					&ctx->flexible_groups,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
>> +							ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> +			}
>> +		} else {
>> +			perf_event_groups_for_each(event, node,
>> +					&ctx->flexible_groups, group_node,
>> +					group_list, group_entry) {
>> +					ctx_flexible_sched_in(event, cpuctx,
>> +							ctx, &can_add_hw);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void cpu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>>  			     enum event_type_t event_type,
>> -			     struct task_struct *task)
>> +			     struct task_struct *task, int mux)
>>  {
>>  	struct perf_event_context *ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
>>  
>> -	ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, task);
>> +	ctx_sched_in(ctx, cpuctx, event_type, task, mux);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  					struct task_struct *task)
>>  {
>>  	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
>> +	int mux = 0;
>>  
>>  	cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
>>  	if (cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx)
>> @@ -3371,8 +3452,8 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>  	 * events, no need to flip the cpuctx's events around.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ctx->pinned_groups))
>> -		cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>> -	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, task);
>> +		cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
>> +	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, task, mux);
>>  	perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
>>  
>>  unlock:
>> @@ -3618,7 +3699,7 @@ static void rotate_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>>  static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
>>  {
>>  	struct perf_event_context *ctx = NULL;
>> -	int rotate = 0;
>> +	int rotate = 0, mux = 1;
>>  
>>  	if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events) {
>>  		if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events != cpuctx->ctx.nr_active)
>> @@ -3637,15 +3718,15 @@ static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
>>  	perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
>>  	perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>>  
>> -	cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>> +	cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE, mux);
> 
> It's '1'.
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-02  8:11 [PATCH v6 0/3] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02  8:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 20:30     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07  7:17         ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07  8:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07  9:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:32               ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 15:55                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 16:27                   ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-07 16:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 17:39                       ` Andi Kleen
2017-08-07 18:12                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 18:13                       ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-15 17:28           ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 13:39             ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 14:18               ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-29 13:51             ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30  8:30               ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-30 10:18                 ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 10:30                   ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-30 11:13                     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-30 11:16                 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12                   ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12             ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-07 15:22         ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02  8:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/3]: perf/core: use context tstamp_data for skipped events on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-03 13:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 14:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:58     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 15:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-03 18:47     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 12:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 12:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-04 14:25           ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-04 14:23         ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-10 15:57     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-22 20:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23  8:54         ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 17:18           ` [RFC][PATCH] perf: Rewrite enabled/running timekeeping Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-31 19:51             ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05  7:51               ` Stephane Eranian
2017-09-05  9:44                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 10:45             ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:31               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 11:17             ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-01 12:42               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 21:03             ` Vince Weaver
2017-09-04 10:46             ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 12:08               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 14:56                 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-04 15:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 15:58                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 10:17                     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 11:19                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-11  6:55                         ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:06                       ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-05 12:59                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 16:03                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 13:48                           ` Alexey Budankov
2017-09-08  8:47                           ` Alexey Budankov
2018-03-12 17:43                             ` [tip:perf/core] perf/cor: Use RB trees for pinned/flexible groups tip-bot for Alexey Budankov
2017-08-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/3]: perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18  5:21   ` [PATCH v7 1/2] perf/core: use rb trees for pinned/flexible groups Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:17     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 17:23       ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-18  5:22   ` [PATCH v7 2/2] perf/core: add mux switch to skip to the current CPU's events list on mux interrupt Alexey Budankov
2017-08-23 11:54     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-08-23 18:12       ` Alexey Budankov [this message]
2017-08-22 20:21   ` [PATCH v7 0/2] perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-23  8:54     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-08-31 10:12     ` Alexey Budankov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7fa57c2-fc86-a21c-9380-5ab1ecc53fe7@linux.intel.com \
    --to=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=valery.cherepennikov@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®