From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf util: Let get_tracing_file() can return NULL
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:53:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4jaj3h4.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363701261.5938.18.camel@gandalf.local.home> (Steven Rostedt's message of "Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:54:21 -0400")
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:54:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:53 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
>>
>> So that it can be used by other places.
>>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
>> index 5729f434c5b1..f241343b7d48 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static const char *find_debugfs(void)
>> const char *path = perf_debugfs_mount(NULL);
>>
>> if (!path)
>> - die("Your kernel not support debugfs filesystem");
>> + pr_err("Your kernel not support debugfs filesystem");
>
> "Your kernel does not support the debugfs filesystem"
>
> I know you just did a s/die/pr_err/ but might as well fix the grammar
> too ;-)
Right, will do.
>
>>
>> return path;
>> }
>> @@ -81,8 +81,12 @@ static const char *find_tracing_dir(void)
>> return tracing;
>>
>> debugfs = find_debugfs();
>> + if (!debugfs)
>> + return NULL;
>>
>> - tracing = malloc_or_die(strlen(debugfs) + 9);
>> + tracing = malloc(strlen(debugfs) + 9);
>> + if (!tracing)
>> + return NULL;
>>
>> sprintf(tracing, "%s/tracing", debugfs);
>>
>> @@ -99,7 +103,9 @@ static char *get_tracing_file(const char *name)
>> if (!tracing)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - file = malloc_or_die(strlen(tracing) + strlen(name) + 2);
>> + file = malloc(strlen(tracing) + strlen(name) + 2);
>> + if (!file)
>> + return NULL;
>
> Should have clean up as well. That is, if file fails, we need to free
> tracing. Otherwise there's a memory leak.
Well, I'm not sure - there's a static pointer in the
find_tracing_dir(). If we free tracing here, we'll need to reset
tracing_found in the function also. So I just kept it. :(
>
>>
>> sprintf(file, "%s/%s", tracing, name);
>> return file;
>> @@ -170,6 +176,9 @@ static void read_header_files(void)
>> struct stat st;
>>
>> path = get_tracing_file("events/header_page");
>> + if (!path)
>> + die("can't get tracing/events/header_page");
>> +
>> if (stat(path, &st) < 0)
>> die("can't read '%s'", path);
>>
>> @@ -178,6 +187,9 @@ static void read_header_files(void)
>> put_tracing_file(path);
>>
>> path = get_tracing_file("events/header_event");
>> + if (!path)
>> + die("can't get tracing/events/header_event");
>> +
>> if (stat(path, &st) < 0)
>> die("can't read '%s'", path);
>>
>> @@ -251,6 +263,8 @@ static void read_ftrace_files(struct tracepoint_path *tps)
>> char *path;
>>
>> path = get_tracing_file("events/ftrace");
>> + if (!path)
>> + die("can't get tracing/events/ftrace");
>>
>> copy_event_system(path, tps);
>>
>> @@ -279,6 +293,8 @@ static void read_event_files(struct tracepoint_path *tps)
>> int ret;
>>
>> path = get_tracing_file("events");
>> + if (!path)
>> + die("can't get tracing/events");
>>
>> dir = opendir(path);
>> if (!dir)
>> @@ -343,6 +359,9 @@ static void read_ftrace_printk(void)
>> int ret;
>>
>> path = get_tracing_file("printk_formats");
>> + if (!path)
>> + die("can't get tracing/printk_formats");
>> +
>
> OK, so we are just moving die to the caller? I'm fine with that. If we
> can get the utilities to remove die, that's a big step.
They'll be removed on later patches, I moved them to callers since I
don't have proper error handling code at this time.
Thanks for review,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 8:53 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf util: Cleanup die() and its friends Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf util: Let get_tracing_file() can return NULL Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 0:53 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf util: Get rid of malloc_or_die() in trace-event-info.c Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf util: Get rid of write_or_die() from trace-event-info.c Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 14:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-19 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-19 14:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-19 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20 0:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf util: Get rid of die() calls " Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf util: Handle failure case in trace_report() Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 14:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 1:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-03-20 1:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf util: Get rid of malloc_or_die() in trace-event-read.c Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 14:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 1:14 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-03-20 1:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 3:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-03-20 3:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 13:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf util: Get rid of read_or_die() " Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 1:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-03-20 1:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf util: Get rid of die() calls in trace-data-read.c Namhyung Kim
2013-03-19 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-20 1:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-03-20 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-03-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf util: Cleanup calc_data_size logic Namhyung Kim
2013-03-21 7:18 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf util: Cleanup die() and its friends (v2) Namhyung Kim
2013-03-21 7:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf util: Let get_tracing_file() can return NULL Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4jaj3h4.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome