[PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: fit maximized ECC step to page size

[PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: fit maximized ECC step to page size

[James Hilliard]

When nand-ecc-maximize is set, the driver unconditionally selects a
1024-byte ECC step. A NAND with a 512-byte page consequently produces
zero ECC steps before the available OOB bytes are divided by the step
count.

The older sunxi NAND controllers support 512-byte ECC blocks. Select the
smaller of the page size and the preferred 1024-byte step, using a
512-byte step for a 512-byte page while retaining 1024-byte steps for
larger pages. Unsupported smaller steps and controllers without
512-byte support continue to be rejected by the existing checks.

Fixes: 4796d8655915 ("mtd: nand: sunxi: Support ECC maximization")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- fix ECC maximization at its source by selecting a 512-byte step for
  512-byte pages instead of validating the derived step count
- retain 1024-byte steps for larger pages and the existing capability checks
- rebase on the current MTD nand/next branch
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811060651.227431-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 83666dd6cb2a..de1e6b49f79a 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -2084,7 +2084,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
 	if (nanddev->ecc.user_conf.flags & NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE_STRENGTH) {
 		int bytes = mtd->oobsize;
 
-		ecc->size = 1024;
+		ecc->size = min_t(unsigned int, mtd->writesize, 1024);
 		nsectors = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
 
 		if (!nfc->caps->reg_user_data_len) {

---
base-commit: def559a215699aa2f2d8ef98f30156b9d562a154
change-id: 20260904-submit-sunxi-nand-ecc-step-validation-0e571088b5e7

Best regards,
--  
James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: fit maximized ECC step to page size

[Miquel Raynal]

Hello James,

On 04/09/2026 at 16:39:27 -06, James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:

> When nand-ecc-maximize is set, the driver unconditionally selects a
> 1024-byte ECC step. A NAND with a 512-byte page consequently produces
> zero ECC steps before the available OOB bytes are divided by the step
> count.
>
> The older sunxi NAND controllers support 512-byte ECC blocks. Select the
> smaller of the page size and the preferred 1024-byte step, using a
> 512-byte step for a 512-byte page while retaining 1024-byte steps for
> larger pages. Unsupported smaller steps and controllers without
> 512-byte support continue to be rejected by the existing checks.
>
> Fixes: 4796d8655915 ("mtd: nand: sunxi: Support ECC maximization")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>

As reported by Sashiko, there is another use of 1024 down the road which
must be modified accordingly. Although, in practice, 512-byte page NANDs
have disappeared for quite some time, so this is a theoretical fix more
than a real problem.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: fit maximized ECC step to page size

[James Hilliard]

On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 4:03 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hello James,
>
> On 04/09/2026 at 16:39:27 -06, James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When nand-ecc-maximize is set, the driver unconditionally selects a
> > 1024-byte ECC step. A NAND with a 512-byte page consequently produces
> > zero ECC steps before the available OOB bytes are divided by the step
> > count.
> >
> > The older sunxi NAND controllers support 512-byte ECC blocks. Select the
> > smaller of the page size and the preferred 1024-byte step, using a
> > 512-byte step for a 512-byte page while retaining 1024-byte steps for
> > larger pages. Unsupported smaller steps and controllers without
> > 512-byte support continue to be rejected by the existing checks.
> >
> > Fixes: 4796d8655915 ("mtd: nand: sunxi: Support ECC maximization")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
>
> As reported by Sashiko, there is another use of 1024 down the road which
> must be modified accordingly. Although, in practice, 512-byte page NANDs
> have disappeared for quite some time, so this is a theoretical fix more
> than a real problem.

Does the v3 I sent look like it should work?:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904-submit-sunxi-nand-ecc-step-validation-v3-1-931cec317c10@gmail.com/

>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl

Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: fit maximized ECC step to page size

[Miquel Raynal]

On 08/09/2026 at 09:27:08 -06, James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 4:03 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello James,
>>
>> On 04/09/2026 at 16:39:27 -06, James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > When nand-ecc-maximize is set, the driver unconditionally selects a
>> > 1024-byte ECC step. A NAND with a 512-byte page consequently produces
>> > zero ECC steps before the available OOB bytes are divided by the step
>> > count.
>> >
>> > The older sunxi NAND controllers support 512-byte ECC blocks. Select the
>> > smaller of the page size and the preferred 1024-byte step, using a
>> > 512-byte step for a 512-byte page while retaining 1024-byte steps for
>> > larger pages. Unsupported smaller steps and controllers without
>> > 512-byte support continue to be rejected by the existing checks.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 4796d8655915 ("mtd: nand: sunxi: Support ECC maximization")
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> > Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
>>
>> As reported by Sashiko, there is another use of 1024 down the road which
>> must be modified accordingly. Although, in practice, 512-byte page NANDs
>> have disappeared for quite some time, so this is a theoretical fix more
>> than a real problem.
>
> Does the v3 I sent look like it should work?:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904-submit-sunxi-nand-ecc-step-validation-v3-1-931cec317c10@gmail.com/

Yes I think so.