* [PATCH] some clean up to intel-gtt.c
@ 2010-09-24 12:25 Jan Beulich
2010-09-24 12:38 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2010-09-24 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chris; +Cc: eric, linux-kernel
In commit e517a5e97080bbe52857bd0d7df9b66602d53c4d the call to
map_page_into_agp() got removed from intel_i830_setup_flush(), but the
counterpart call from intel_i830_fini_flush() to unmap_page_from_agp()
was left in place.
Additionally, the page allocated here never gets its physical address
used for sending to hardware, so there's no need to allocate it with
GFP_DMA32. Nor is __GFP_ZERO really necessary, as the page is used
only to store data to force flushing of some internal processor state.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.36-rc5/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
+++ 2.6.36-rc5-intel-agp-cleanup/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
@@ -768,7 +768,6 @@ static void intel_i830_fini_flush(void)
{
kunmap(intel_private.i8xx_page);
intel_private.i8xx_flush_page = NULL;
- unmap_page_from_agp(intel_private.i8xx_page);
__free_page(intel_private.i8xx_page);
intel_private.i8xx_page = NULL;
@@ -780,7 +779,7 @@ static void intel_i830_setup_flush(void)
if (intel_private.i8xx_page)
return;
- intel_private.i8xx_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | GFP_DMA32);
+ intel_private.i8xx_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!intel_private.i8xx_page)
return;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] some clean up to intel-gtt.c
2010-09-24 12:25 [PATCH] some clean up to intel-gtt.c Jan Beulich
@ 2010-09-24 12:38 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2010-09-24 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: eric, linux-kernel
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:25:30 +0100, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> In commit e517a5e97080bbe52857bd0d7df9b66602d53c4d the call to
> map_page_into_agp() got removed from intel_i830_setup_flush(), but the
> counterpart call from intel_i830_fini_flush() to unmap_page_from_agp()
> was left in place.
Thanks, those flags do look redundant. Applied to -next.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-24 12:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-24 12:25 [PATCH] some clean up to intel-gtt.c Jan Beulich
2010-09-24 12:38 ` Chris Wilson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome