Re: [PATCH] blackfin/sram: use 'unsigned long' for irqflags

["Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>>> From 3ef36948a88a968eec1b09859aa251dc6727df4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:00:23 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] blackfin/sram: use 'unsigned long' for irqflags
>>>
>>> Using just 'unsigned' will make flags an unsigned int. While this is
>>> arguably not an error on blackfin where sizeof(int) == sizeof(long),
>>> the patch is still justified on the grounds of principle.
>>
>> indeed, thanks
>>
>>> The patch was generated using the Coccinelle semantic patch framework.
>>
>> spam ?
>
> Hm? I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that. Do you think
> the credit is undeserved?

*shrug* ... i dont see other patches with things like:
The patch was generated with git.
The patch was generated with eclipse.
The patch was generated with emacs.
etc...

we dont generally list all of the tools in the log message that was
used in *creating* a patch since it doesnt really add any value when
looking back historically at changes.
-mike