mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Paul Barker <paul@pbarker.dev>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul Barker" <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>,
	"Biju Das" <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
	"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 05/11] net: ravb: Simplify types in RX csum validation
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 22:30:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cb1de35-a40a-4d1b-a081-1b8fc08e0a6a@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4707880-2be4-4132-a3e1-8b104b89828c@omp.ru>

On 9/30/24 22:11, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
[...]

>> From: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
>>
>> The HW checksum value is used as a 16-bit flag, it is zero when the
> 
>    I think I prefer s/HW/hardware/ but there's no hard feelings... :-)
> 
>> checksum has been validated and non-zero otherwise. Therefore we don't
>> need to treat this as an actual __wsum type or call csum_unfold(), we
>> can just use a u16 pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>> index 1dd2152734b0..9350ca10ab22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> [...]
>> @@ -762,23 +761,22 @@ static void ravb_rx_csum_gbeth(struct sk_buff *skb)
[...]
>> +	if (unlikely(skb->len < csum_len))
>>  		return;
>>  
>>  	if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
>> -		last_frag = &shinfo->frags[shinfo->nr_frags - 1];
>> -		hw_csum = skb_frag_address(last_frag) +
>> -			  skb_frag_size(last_frag);
>> -		skb_frag_size_sub(last_frag, 2 * sizeof(__sum16));
>> +		skb_frag_t *last_frag = &shinfo->frags[shinfo->nr_frags - 1];
> 
>    Could've been done in the previous patch...

   Even fit better there, I think...

>> +
>> +		hw_csum = (u16 *)(skb_frag_address(last_frag) +
>> +				  skb_frag_size(last_frag));
>> +		skb_frag_size_sub(last_frag, csum_len);
>>  	} else {
>> -		hw_csum = skb_tail_pointer(skb);
>> -		skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 2 * sizeof(__sum16));
>> +		hw_csum = (u16 *)skb_tail_pointer(skb);
>> +		skb_trim(skb, skb->len - csum_len);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	hw_csum -= sizeof(__sum16);
>> -	csum_proto = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)get_unaligned_le16(hw_csum));
>> -
>> -	if (!csum_proto)
>> +	if (!*--hw_csum)
> 
>    Hm, you lost get_unaligned_le16() here. The checksum can be anywhere,
> unaligned too...

   No need to keep using get_unaligned_le16() itself but you should then switch to 
using get_unaligned().

[...]

MBR, Sergey


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-30 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-30 16:08 [net-next PATCH 00/11] Extend GbEth checksum offload support to VLAN/IPv6 packets Paul Barker
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 01/11] net: ravb: Factor out checksum offload enable bits Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:02   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 02/11] net: ravb: Disable IP header RX checksum offloading Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:16   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 03/11] net: ravb: Drop IP protocol check from RX csum verification Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:29   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 04/11] net: ravb: Combine if conditions in RX csum validation Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:40   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 05/11] net: ravb: Simplify types " Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:11   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 19:30     ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2024-10-03  9:23     ` Paul Barker
2024-10-03 13:20       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 06/11] net: ravb: Disable IP header TX checksum offloading Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:23   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 07/11] net: ravb: Simplify UDP TX checksum offload Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:39   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 08/11] net: ravb: Support ICMP TX checksum offload for GbEth Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:48   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 09/11] net: ravb: Enable IPv6 RX checksum offloading " Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:55   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 10/11] net: ravb: Enable IPv6 TX checksum offload " Paul Barker
2024-09-30 20:08   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 11/11] net: ravb: Add VLAN checksum support Paul Barker
2024-09-30 20:36   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 22:32     ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-10-01 10:44     ` Simon Horman
2024-10-02 15:27       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-10-03 10:26     ` Paul Barker
2024-10-01 16:46   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8cb1de35-a40a-4d1b-a081-1b8fc08e0a6a@omp.ru \
    --to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®