From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>,
Paul Barker <paul@pbarker.dev>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>,
"Biju Das" <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 05/11] net: ravb: Simplify types in RX csum validation
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:20:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfb2ebd9-0d96-4ce2-b766-358c7253e065@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a779070-d91a-49df-a606-5fc9428e312c@bp.renesas.com>
On 10/3/24 12:23, Paul Barker wrote:
[...]
>>> From: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
>>>
>>> The HW checksum value is used as a 16-bit flag, it is zero when the
>>
>> I think I prefer s/HW/hardware/ but there's no hard feelings... :-)
>>
>>> checksum has been validated and non-zero otherwise. Therefore we don't
>>> need to treat this as an actual __wsum type or call csum_unfold(), we
>>> can just use a u16 pointer.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>>> index 1dd2152734b0..9350ca10ab22 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>> [...]
>>> @@ -762,23 +761,22 @@ static void ravb_rx_csum_gbeth(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> * The last 2 bytes are the protocol checksum status which will be zero
>>> * if the checksum has been validated.
>>> */
>>> - if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__sum16) * 2))
>>> + csum_len = sizeof(*hw_csum) * 2;
>>
>> Could've been done by an initializer instead?
>
> So, if I move this to the initializers at the start of the function,
> csum_len must be declared after hw_csum which breaks reverse Christmas
> tree ordering:
>
> struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> u16 *hw_csum;
> size_t csum_len = sizeof(*hw_csum) * 2;
Could use sizeof(u16) instead, but it's OK to ignore me on this
matter. :-)
> Thanks,
MBR, Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 16:08 [net-next PATCH 00/11] Extend GbEth checksum offload support to VLAN/IPv6 packets Paul Barker
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 01/11] net: ravb: Factor out checksum offload enable bits Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:02 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 02/11] net: ravb: Disable IP header RX checksum offloading Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:16 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 03/11] net: ravb: Drop IP protocol check from RX csum verification Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:29 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 04/11] net: ravb: Combine if conditions in RX csum validation Paul Barker
2024-09-30 17:40 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 05/11] net: ravb: Simplify types " Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:11 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 19:30 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-10-03 9:23 ` Paul Barker
2024-10-03 13:20 ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 06/11] net: ravb: Disable IP header TX checksum offloading Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:23 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 07/11] net: ravb: Simplify UDP TX checksum offload Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:39 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 08/11] net: ravb: Support ICMP TX checksum offload for GbEth Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:48 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 09/11] net: ravb: Enable IPv6 RX checksum offloading " Paul Barker
2024-09-30 19:55 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 10/11] net: ravb: Enable IPv6 TX checksum offload " Paul Barker
2024-09-30 20:08 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 16:08 ` [net-next PATCH 11/11] net: ravb: Add VLAN checksum support Paul Barker
2024-09-30 20:36 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-09-30 22:32 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-10-01 10:44 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-02 15:27 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-10-03 10:26 ` Paul Barker
2024-10-01 16:46 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfb2ebd9-0d96-4ce2-b766-358c7253e065@omp.ru \
--to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®