* [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction
@ 2026-09-22 19:14 Siddharth Karanam
2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andersson, mathieu.poirier
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, Siddharth Karanam
Instead of invoking ti_sci_handle's ti_sci_dev_ops member directly
in the driver code, this abstracts the property read of
"ti,sci-dev-id" and the function pointers supported by
ti_sci_dev_ops such as is_on, get_device and put_device.
The goal of the patch is to maintain a single source
of origin for all ti_sci_dev_ops call sites. Any stray calls
to any dev_ops function pointer members in driver code should
eventually be abstracted through this header.
The second patch abstracts certain device ops' firmware logic
even further (such as get_device/put_device) via pm_runtime.
Siddharth Karanam (2):
remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction
remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through
pm_runtime
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 16 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 4 +-
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 14 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 13 ++--
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 ++++------
drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction 2026-09-22 19:14 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 ` Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-28 14:39 ` Andrew Davis 2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Mathieu Poirier 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andersson, mathieu.poirier Cc: linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, Siddharth Karanam Instead of invoking ti_sci_handle's ti_sci_dev_ops member directly in the driver code, this abstracts the property read of "ti,sci-dev-id" and the function pointers supported by ti_sci_dev_ops such as is_on, get_device and put_device. The goal of the patch is to maintain a single source of origin for all ti_sci_dev_ops call sites. Any stray calls to any dev_ops function pointer members in driver code should eventually be abstracted through this header. Signed-off-by: Siddharth Karanam <sid9.karanam@gmail.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 16 ++--- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 4 +- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 14 ++-- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 13 ++-- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 +++++------ drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c index 3cb8ae5d72f6..befa9a9bea3a 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include "omap_remoteproc.h" #include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" #include "ti_sci_proc.h" #include "ti_k3_common.h" @@ -120,8 +121,7 @@ int k3_rproc_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc) if (ret) dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); } else { - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); } @@ -140,13 +140,11 @@ int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc) ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id)) + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); } } else { - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); } @@ -223,8 +221,7 @@ int k3_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) } } - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "could not deassert module-reset for internal RAM loading\n"); return ret; @@ -253,8 +250,7 @@ int k3_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) return 0; - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed\n"); return ret; diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h index aee3c28dbe51..7ba0903ebe0a 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ struct k3_rproc_dev_data { * @reset: reset control handle * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle + * @tsd: TI-SCI device control handle * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle - * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier * @mbox: mailbox channel handle * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel * @priv: void pointer to carry any private data @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ struct k3_rproc { struct reset_control *reset; const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data; struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + struct ti_sci_dev *tsd; const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; - u32 ti_sci_id; struct mbox_chan *mbox; struct mbox_client client; void *priv; diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c index d6ceea6dc920..b6042fe7bae7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include "omap_remoteproc.h" #include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" #include "ti_sci_proc.h" #include "ti_k3_common.h" @@ -69,7 +70,6 @@ static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data; struct k3_rproc *kproc; struct rproc *rproc; @@ -110,10 +110,6 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci), "failed to get ti-sci handle\n"); - ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); - if (ret) - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); - kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), @@ -124,6 +120,11 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp), "failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n"); + kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(dev, kproc->ti_sci); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd), + "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n"); + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp); if (ret < 0) { dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ti_sci_proc_request failed\n"); @@ -141,8 +142,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "reserved memory init failed\n"); - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id, - NULL, &p_state); + ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, NULL, &p_state); if (ret) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined\n"); diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c index 3a11fd24eb52..ddf8cb9974ca 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include "omap_remoteproc.h" #include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" #include "ti_sci_proc.h" #include "ti_k3_common.h" @@ -70,10 +71,6 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci), "failed to get ti-sci handle\n"); - ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); - if (ret) - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); - kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), "failed to get reset\n"); @@ -83,6 +80,11 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp), "failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n"); + kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(dev, kproc->ti_sci); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd), + "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n"); + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp); if (ret < 0) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ti_sci_proc_request failed\n"); @@ -98,8 +100,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "reserved memory init failed\n"); - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id, - &r_state, &p_state); + ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, &r_state, &p_state); if (ret) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined\n"); diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index b1d04d082e44..a387848ac400 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include "omap_remoteproc.h" #include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" #include "ti_sci_proc.h" #include "ti_k3_common.h" @@ -140,8 +141,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc) return ret; } - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) { dev_err(kproc->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -156,8 +156,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc) { int ret; - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) { dev_err(kproc->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -168,8 +167,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc) if (ret) { dev_err(kproc->dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id)) + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) dev_warn(kproc->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); } @@ -196,8 +194,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_reset(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) /* disable PSC modules on all applicable cores */ list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { kproc = core->kproc; - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) { dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -210,8 +207,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_reset(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) unroll_module_reset: list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { kproc = core->kproc; - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id)) + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); } core = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); @@ -233,8 +229,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_release(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) /* enable PSC modules on all applicable cores */ list_for_each_entry_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { kproc = core->kproc; - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id); + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); if (ret) { dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -264,8 +259,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_release(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) unroll_module_reset: list_for_each_entry_from(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { kproc = core->kproc; - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, - kproc->ti_sci_id)) + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); } @@ -827,8 +821,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_rproc *kproc) core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id, - &r_state, &c_state); + ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, &r_state, &c_state); if (ret) { dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -1023,7 +1016,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct k3_rproc *kproc; struct k3_r5_core *core, *core1; - struct device_node *np; struct device *cdev; const char *fw_name; struct rproc *rproc; @@ -1032,7 +1024,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) core1 = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { cdev = core->dev; - np = dev_of_node(cdev); ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(cdev, 0, &fw_name); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n", @@ -1067,12 +1058,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) goto out; } - ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); - if (ret) { - dev_err(cdev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); - goto out; - } - kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(cdev, NULL); if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) { ret = dev_err_probe(cdev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), @@ -1087,6 +1072,13 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) goto out; } + kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(cdev, kproc->ti_sci); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd)) { + ret = dev_err_probe(cdev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd), + "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n"); + goto out; + } + ret = k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(to_platform_device(cdev), kproc); if (ret) { dev_err(cdev, "failed to get internal memories, ret = %d\n", diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..897998a97d7f --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * Texas Instruments TI-SCI Device Controller Helper Functions + * + * Copyright (C) 2026 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ + */ + +#ifndef REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H +#define REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H + +#include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> + +/** + * struct ti_sci_dev - structure representing a device control client + * @sci: cached TI-SCI protocol handle + * @ops: cached TI-SCI device ops + * @dev: cached client device pointer + * @dev_id: TI-SCI device id for the consumer remoteproc device + */ +struct ti_sci_dev { + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci; + const struct ti_sci_dev_ops *ops; + struct device *dev; + u32 dev_id; +}; + +static inline +struct ti_sci_dev *ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(struct device *dev, + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) +{ + struct ti_sci_dev *tsd; + int ret; + + tsd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsd), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tsd) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_of_node(dev), "ti,sci-dev-id", + &tsd->dev_id); + if (ret < 0) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + tsd->dev = dev; + tsd->sci = sci; + tsd->ops = &sci->ops.dev_ops; + + return tsd; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_dev_is_on(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd, bool *r_state, + bool *c_state) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsd->ops->is_on(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id, r_state, c_state); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device is_on failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_dev_get_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsd->ops->get_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device get failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_dev_put_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsd->ops->put_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device put failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret; +} + +#endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H */ -- 2.55.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction 2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-28 14:39 ` Andrew Davis 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrew Davis @ 2026-09-28 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Siddharth Karanam, andersson, mathieu.poirier Cc: linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc On 9/22/26 2:14 PM, Siddharth Karanam wrote: > Instead of invoking ti_sci_handle's ti_sci_dev_ops member directly > in the driver code, this abstracts the property read of > "ti,sci-dev-id" and the function pointers supported by > ti_sci_dev_ops such as is_on, get_device and put_device. > > The goal of the patch is to maintain a single source > of origin for all ti_sci_dev_ops call sites. Any stray calls > to any dev_ops function pointer members in driver code should > eventually be abstracted through this header. > > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Karanam <sid9.karanam@gmail.com> > --- The concept looks fine to me as it mostly just mirrors the same abstraction we did for ti_sci_proc_ops in ti_sci_proc.h. So my question is why not instead just extend `struct ti_sci_proc` with the extra ops and dev_id, then add these helper functions to that header? Andrew > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 16 ++--- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 4 +- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 14 ++-- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 13 ++-- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 +++++------ > drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c > index 3cb8ae5d72f6..befa9a9bea3a 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > > #include "omap_remoteproc.h" > #include "remoteproc_internal.h" > +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" > #include "ti_sci_proc.h" > #include "ti_k3_common.h" > > @@ -120,8 +121,7 @@ int k3_rproc_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc) > if (ret) > dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); > } else { > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) > dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); > } > @@ -140,13 +140,11 @@ int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc) > ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); > - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id)) > + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) > dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); > } > } else { > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) > dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); > } > @@ -223,8 +221,7 @@ int k3_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) > } > } > > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "could not deassert module-reset for internal RAM loading\n"); > return ret; > @@ -253,8 +250,7 @@ int k3_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) > if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) > return 0; > > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed\n"); > return ret; > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h > index aee3c28dbe51..7ba0903ebe0a 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h > @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ struct k3_rproc_dev_data { > * @reset: reset control handle > * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data > * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle > + * @tsd: TI-SCI device control handle > * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle > - * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier > * @mbox: mailbox channel handle > * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel > * @priv: void pointer to carry any private data > @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ struct k3_rproc { > struct reset_control *reset; > const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data; > struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; > + struct ti_sci_dev *tsd; > const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; > - u32 ti_sci_id; > struct mbox_chan *mbox; > struct mbox_client client; > void *priv; > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c > index d6ceea6dc920..b6042fe7bae7 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > > #include "omap_remoteproc.h" > #include "remoteproc_internal.h" > +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" > #include "ti_sci_proc.h" > #include "ti_k3_common.h" > > @@ -69,7 +70,6 @@ static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { > static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > const struct k3_rproc_dev_data *data; > struct k3_rproc *kproc; > struct rproc *rproc; > @@ -110,10 +110,6 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci), > "failed to get ti-sci handle\n"); > > - ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); > - if (ret) > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); > - > kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); > if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), > @@ -124,6 +120,11 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp), > "failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n"); > > + kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(dev, kproc->ti_sci); > + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd), > + "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n"); > + > ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp); > if (ret < 0) { > dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ti_sci_proc_request failed\n"); > @@ -141,8 +142,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "reserved memory init failed\n"); > > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id, > - NULL, &p_state); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, NULL, &p_state); > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined\n"); > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c > index 3a11fd24eb52..ddf8cb9974ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > > #include "omap_remoteproc.h" > #include "remoteproc_internal.h" > +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" > #include "ti_sci_proc.h" > #include "ti_k3_common.h" > > @@ -70,10 +71,6 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci), > "failed to get ti-sci handle\n"); > > - ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); > - if (ret) > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); > - > kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); > if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), "failed to get reset\n"); > @@ -83,6 +80,11 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp), > "failed to construct ti-sci proc control\n"); > > + kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(dev, kproc->ti_sci); > + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd), > + "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n"); > + > ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp); > if (ret < 0) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ti_sci_proc_request failed\n"); > @@ -98,8 +100,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "reserved memory init failed\n"); > > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id, > - &r_state, &p_state); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, &r_state, &p_state); > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, > "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined\n"); > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > index b1d04d082e44..a387848ac400 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > > #include "omap_remoteproc.h" > #include "remoteproc_internal.h" > +#include "ti_sci_dev.h" > #include "ti_sci_proc.h" > #include "ti_k3_common.h" > > @@ -140,8 +141,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc) > return ret; > } > > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) { > dev_err(kproc->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", > ret); > @@ -156,8 +156,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc) > { > int ret; > > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) { > dev_err(kproc->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", > ret); > @@ -168,8 +167,7 @@ static int k3_r5_split_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc) > if (ret) { > dev_err(kproc->dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", > ret); > - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id)) > + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) > dev_warn(kproc->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); > } > > @@ -196,8 +194,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_reset(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) > /* disable PSC modules on all applicable cores */ > list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { > kproc = core->kproc; > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) { > dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", > ret); > @@ -210,8 +207,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_reset(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) > unroll_module_reset: > list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { > kproc = core->kproc; > - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id)) > + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) > dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); > } > core = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); > @@ -233,8 +229,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_release(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) > /* enable PSC modules on all applicable cores */ > list_for_each_entry_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { > kproc = core->kproc; > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_get_device(kproc->tsd); > if (ret) { > dev_err(core->dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", > ret); > @@ -264,8 +259,7 @@ static int k3_r5_lockstep_release(struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster) > unroll_module_reset: > list_for_each_entry_from(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { > kproc = core->kproc; > - if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > - kproc->ti_sci_id)) > + if (ti_sci_dev_put_device(kproc->tsd)) > dev_warn(core->dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); > } > > @@ -827,8 +821,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_rproc *kproc) > > core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); > > - ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id, > - &r_state, &c_state); > + ret = ti_sci_dev_is_on(kproc->tsd, &r_state, &c_state); > if (ret) { > dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined, ret = %d\n", > ret); > @@ -1023,7 +1016,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > struct k3_rproc *kproc; > struct k3_r5_core *core, *core1; > - struct device_node *np; > struct device *cdev; > const char *fw_name; > struct rproc *rproc; > @@ -1032,7 +1024,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > core1 = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); > list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { > cdev = core->dev; > - np = dev_of_node(cdev); > ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(cdev, 0, &fw_name); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n", > @@ -1067,12 +1058,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto out; > } > > - ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(cdev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); > - goto out; > - } > - > kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(cdev, NULL); > if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) { > ret = dev_err_probe(cdev, PTR_ERR(kproc->reset), > @@ -1087,6 +1072,13 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto out; > } > > + kproc->tsd = ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(cdev, kproc->ti_sci); > + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsd)) { > + ret = dev_err_probe(cdev, PTR_ERR(kproc->tsd), > + "failed to construct ti-sci dev control\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + > ret = k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(to_platform_device(cdev), kproc); > if (ret) { > dev_err(cdev, "failed to get internal memories, ret = %d\n", > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..897998a97d7f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h > @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Texas Instruments TI-SCI Device Controller Helper Functions > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2026 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ > + */ > + > +#ifndef REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H > +#define REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H > + > +#include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > + > +/** > + * struct ti_sci_dev - structure representing a device control client > + * @sci: cached TI-SCI protocol handle > + * @ops: cached TI-SCI device ops > + * @dev: cached client device pointer > + * @dev_id: TI-SCI device id for the consumer remoteproc device > + */ > +struct ti_sci_dev { > + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci; > + const struct ti_sci_dev_ops *ops; > + struct device *dev; > + u32 dev_id; > +}; > + > +static inline > +struct ti_sci_dev *ti_sci_dev_of_get_tsd(struct device *dev, > + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) > +{ > + struct ti_sci_dev *tsd; > + int ret; > + > + tsd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tsd), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!tsd) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_of_node(dev), "ti,sci-dev-id", > + &tsd->dev_id); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > + > + tsd->dev = dev; > + tsd->sci = sci; > + tsd->ops = &sci->ops.dev_ops; > + > + return tsd; > +} > + > +static inline int ti_sci_dev_is_on(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd, bool *r_state, > + bool *c_state) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = tsd->ops->is_on(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id, r_state, c_state); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device is_on failed: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static inline int ti_sci_dev_get_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = tsd->ops->get_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device get failed: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static inline int ti_sci_dev_put_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = tsd->ops->put_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device put failed: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > +} > + > +#endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_DEV_H */ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime 2026-09-22 19:14 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 ` Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Mathieu Poirier 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-22 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andersson, mathieu.poirier Cc: linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, Siddharth Karanam Instead of directly invoking ti_sci_handle->dev_ops.get_device / put_device (that is direct firmware logic), it is better to abstract it through linux/pm_runtime.h's pm_runtime_put/get_sync which will call the vendor's specific firmware logic automatically. The rationale here being better code quality and reduced scope for refactoring in case of any changes to the ti_sci protocol. Signed-off-by: Siddharth Karanam <sid9.karanam@gmail.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h index 897998a97d7f..ec17af3ebf5e 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h @@ -59,23 +59,30 @@ static inline int ti_sci_dev_is_on(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd, bool *r_state, return ret; } +/* Request power on to rproc through the TI-SCI PM domain */ static inline int ti_sci_dev_get_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd) { - int ret; + int ret = 0; + + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tsd->dev); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(tsd->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + pm_runtime_put_noidle(tsd->dev); + } - ret = tsd->ops->get_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id); - if (ret) - dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device get failed: %d\n", ret); return ret; } +/* Request power off to a rproc through the TI-SCI PM domain */ static inline int ti_sci_dev_put_device(struct ti_sci_dev *tsd) { - int ret; + int ret = 0; + + ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(tsd->dev); + + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(tsd->dev, "pm_runtime_put_sync failed, ret = %d\n", ret); - ret = tsd->ops->put_device(tsd->sci, tsd->dev_id); - if (ret) - dev_err(tsd->dev, "ti-sci device put failed: %d\n", ret); return ret; } -- 2.55.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction 2026-09-22 19:14 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime Siddharth Karanam @ 2026-09-25 16:00 ` Mathieu Poirier 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2026-09-25 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Siddharth Karanam, afd, b-padhi; +Cc: andersson, linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc TI people, please review and test this patchset. Thanks, Mathieu On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 12:44:51AM +0530, Siddharth Karanam wrote: > Instead of invoking ti_sci_handle's ti_sci_dev_ops member directly > in the driver code, this abstracts the property read of > "ti,sci-dev-id" and the function pointers supported by > ti_sci_dev_ops such as is_on, get_device and put_device. > > The goal of the patch is to maintain a single source > of origin for all ti_sci_dev_ops call sites. Any stray calls > to any dev_ops function pointer members in driver code should > eventually be abstracted through this header. > > The second patch abstracts certain device ops' firmware logic > even further (such as get_device/put_device) via pm_runtime. > > Siddharth Karanam (2): > remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction > remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through > pm_runtime > > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 16 ++-- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 4 +- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 14 ++-- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 13 ++-- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 ++++------ > drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_dev.h > > -- > 2.55.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-28 14:40 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-22 19:14 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-28 14:39 ` Andrew Davis 2026-09-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: k3: Abstract ti_sci_handle's dev_ops calls through pm_runtime Siddharth Karanam 2026-09-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Add ti_sci_dev_ops abstraction Mathieu Poirier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®