mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, jstultz@google.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	meted@linux.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	ruanjinjie@huawei.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 17:45:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d407e07-6c7d-49db-947f-e7ba6a30f6d6@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803191731.3244294-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>



On 8/4/26 12:47 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> All architectures which currently suppoort PREEMPT_DYNAMIC select
> ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY.  On architectures which select
> ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY, it has not been possible to select the NONE and
> VOLUNTARY preemption models since v7.0 due to commit:
> 
>    7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes")
> 
> Hence in practice PREEMPT_DYNAMIC no longer supports the NONE or
> VOLUNTARY preemption models.
> 
> This series makes the de-facto situation official by making
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY, and removing redundant
> code.
> 
> Since v1, I've had to rebase atop v7.2-rc4 to avoid a conflict with
> commit:
> 
>    a2c02aa0c6ca ("powerpc: Remove dead non-preemption code")
> 
> Given this is now late in the cycle, and given the tip:sched/core branch
> is based on v7.2-rc1, I suspect tip folk might not want to queue this
> now. Please let me know what you'd prefer; I'm happy to rebase and
> resend after v7.3-rc1.
> 
> Since v1:
> * Rebase to v7.2-rc4
> * Apply Revied-by tags.
> * Fix typos in commit messages.
> * Add patch to cleanup accessors (per Shrikanth's comment)
> 
> Mark.
> 

I have tested with and without PREEMPT_DYNAMIC for lazy/full.
I haven't observed anything odd.

For the series,
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>

> Mark Rutland (6):
>    sched: dynamic: Make PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
>    sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched()
>    sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt_schedule{,_notrace}()
>    sched: dynamic: Simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>    sched: dynamic: Remove HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_{CALL,KEY}
>    sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt model accessors
> 
>   arch/Kconfig                     |  38 -------
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig               |   1 -
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h |  10 --
>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig           |   1 -
>   arch/powerpc/Kconfig             |   1 -
>   arch/riscv/Kconfig               |   1 -
>   arch/s390/Kconfig                |   1 -
>   arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h  |  11 --
>   arch/x86/Kconfig                 |   1 -
>   arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h   |  28 -----
>   include/asm-generic/preempt.h    |  10 --
>   include/linux/irq-entry-common.h |  17 +--
>   include/linux/kernel.h           |  20 ----
>   include/linux/preempt.h          |  20 ++--
>   include/linux/sched.h            |  31 +-----
>   kernel/Kconfig.preempt           |   9 +-
>   kernel/entry/common.c            |  17 +--
>   kernel/sched/core.c              | 180 +------------------------------
>   18 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 19:17 Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched: dynamic: Make PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 10:08   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt_schedule{,_notrace}() Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 13:23   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-08-07  1:35   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched: dynamic: Remove HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_{CALL,KEY} Mark Rutland
2026-08-07  1:54   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt model accessors Mark Rutland
2026-08-07  2:00   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-05  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mete Durlu
2026-08-06 12:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-08-07  3:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-07  3:33 ` Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d407e07-6c7d-49db-947f-e7ba6a30f6d6@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®