From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, jstultz@google.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, meted@linux.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
sshegde@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt model accessors
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 20:17:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803191731.3244294-7-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803191731.3244294-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is now limited to the FULL and LAZY preemption models.
When CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y, the NONE and VOLUNTARY models cannot be
used, and neither CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE nor CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY can
be selected.
Simplify the preempt model accessors accordingly: remove the out-of-line
implementations of preempt_model_none() and preempt_model_voluntary(),
and remove the preempt_dynamic_{none,voluntary} values.
There are no current users of preempt_model_voluntary(), but I've kept
it around for consistency, with every scheduler model having its own
preempt_model_*() accessor.
Suggested-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/preempt.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ----
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index d964f965c8ffc..7e2ec8e29c83f 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -470,21 +470,11 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(preempt_notrace, preempt_disable_notrace(), preempt_enable_n
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
-extern bool preempt_model_none(void);
-extern bool preempt_model_voluntary(void);
extern bool preempt_model_full(void);
extern bool preempt_model_lazy(void);
#else
-static inline bool preempt_model_none(void)
-{
- return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE);
-}
-static inline bool preempt_model_voluntary(void)
-{
- return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY);
-}
static inline bool preempt_model_full(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT);
@@ -497,6 +487,16 @@ static inline bool preempt_model_lazy(void)
#endif
+static inline bool preempt_model_none(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE);
+}
+
+static inline bool preempt_model_voluntary(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY);
+}
+
static inline bool preempt_model_rt(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7b815d8ce67d3..4026f2399edf3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7803,8 +7803,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
enum {
preempt_dynamic_undefined = -1,
- preempt_dynamic_none,
- preempt_dynamic_voluntary,
preempt_dynamic_full,
preempt_dynamic_lazy,
};
@@ -7889,8 +7887,6 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
} \
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_model_##mode)
-PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(none);
-PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(voluntary);
PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(full);
PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(lazy);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 19:17 [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched: dynamic: Make PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY Mark Rutland
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 10:08 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt_schedule{,_notrace}() Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 13:23 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-08-07 1:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched: dynamic: Remove HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_{CALL,KEY} Mark Rutland
2026-08-07 1:54 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 15:26 ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2026-08-07 2:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt model accessors Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mete Durlu
2026-08-06 12:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-07 3:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-03 1:30 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-07 3:33 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 16:04 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803191731.3244294-7-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®