From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <frederic@kernel.org>, <jstultz@google.com>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <meted@linux.ibm.com>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<sshegde@linux.ibm.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched()
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 18:08:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc4a40c9-d297-4269-aa0f-d2f9fedde1ec@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803191731.3244294-3-mark.rutland@arm.com>
在 2026/8/4 3:17, Mark Rutland 写道:
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is now limited to the FULL and LAZY preemption models.
> In either model, both cond_resched() and might_resched() are always
> disabled and do nothing.
>
> Remove the unnecessary code for these when PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 20 -------------------
> include/linux/sched.h | 31 +++--------------------------
> kernel/sched/core.c | 44 +-----------------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index e5570a16cbb1a..533ee1e6e1cb7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -43,30 +43,10 @@ struct completion;
> struct user;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD
> -
> extern int __cond_resched(void);
> # define might_resched() __cond_resched()
> -
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL)
> -
> -extern int __cond_resched(void);
> -
> -DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(might_resched, __cond_resched);
> -
> -static __always_inline void might_resched(void)
> -{
> - static_call_mod(might_resched)();
> -}
> -
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY)
> -
> -extern int dynamic_might_resched(void);
> -# define might_resched() dynamic_might_resched()
> -
> #else
> -
> # define might_resched() do { } while (0)
> -
> #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_* */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 373bcc0598d10..1a44c5261c2dd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2119,44 +2119,19 @@ static inline void set_need_resched_current(void)
> * value indicates whether a reschedule was done in fact.
> * cond_resched_lock() will drop the spinlock before scheduling,
> */
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC)
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
> extern int __cond_resched(void);
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL)
> -
> -DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(cond_resched, __cond_resched);
> -
> -static __always_inline int _cond_resched(void)
> -{
> - return static_call_mod(cond_resched)();
> -}
> -
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY)
> -
> -extern int dynamic_cond_resched(void);
> -
> -static __always_inline int _cond_resched(void)
> -{
> - return dynamic_cond_resched();
> -}
> -
> -#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPTION */
> -
> static inline int _cond_resched(void)
> {
> return __cond_resched();
> }
> -
> -#endif /* PREEMPT_DYNAMIC && CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL */
> -
> -#else /* CONFIG_PREEMPTION && !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
> -
> +#else
> static inline int _cond_resched(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -
> -#endif /* !CONFIG_PREEMPTION || CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
> +#endif
>
> #define cond_resched() ({ \
> __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0); \
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 2db78826a484b..84ec93694d718 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7733,7 +7733,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *pi_task)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES */
>
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC)
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
> int __sched __cond_resched(void)
> {
> if (should_resched(0) && !irqs_disabled()) {
> @@ -7761,38 +7761,6 @@ int __sched __cond_resched(void)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched);
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> -# ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL
> -# define cond_resched_dynamic_enabled __cond_resched
> -# define cond_resched_dynamic_disabled ((void *)&__static_call_return0)
> -DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(cond_resched, __cond_resched);
> -EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(cond_resched);
> -
> -# define might_resched_dynamic_enabled __cond_resched
> -# define might_resched_dynamic_disabled ((void *)&__static_call_return0)
> -DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(might_resched, __cond_resched);
> -EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(might_resched);
> -# elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY)
> -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sk_dynamic_cond_resched);
> -int __sched dynamic_cond_resched(void)
> -{
> - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_cond_resched))
> - return 0;
> - return __cond_resched();
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(dynamic_cond_resched);
> -
> -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sk_dynamic_might_resched);
> -int __sched dynamic_might_resched(void)
> -{
> - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_might_resched))
> - return 0;
> - return __cond_resched();
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(dynamic_might_resched);
> -# endif
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
> -
> /*
> * __cond_resched_lock() - if a reschedule is pending, drop the given lock,
> * call schedule, and on return reacquire the lock.
> @@ -7862,8 +7830,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
> # endif
>
> /*
> - * SC:cond_resched
> - * SC:might_resched
> * SC:preempt_schedule
> * SC:preempt_schedule_notrace
> * SC:irqentry_exit_cond_resched
> @@ -7876,16 +7842,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
> * (unselectable)
> *
> * FULL:
> - * cond_resched <- RET0
> - * might_resched <- RET0
> * preempt_schedule <- preempt_schedule
> * preempt_schedule_notrace <- preempt_schedule_notrace
> * irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- irqentry_exit_cond_resched
> * dynamic_preempt_lazy <- false
> *
> * LAZY:
> - * cond_resched <- RET0
> - * might_resched <- RET0
> * preempt_schedule <- preempt_schedule
> * preempt_schedule_notrace <- preempt_schedule_notrace
> * irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- irqentry_exit_cond_resched
> @@ -7932,8 +7894,6 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
> {
> switch (mode) {
> case preempt_dynamic_full:
> - preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
> - preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
> preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
> preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
> preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> @@ -7943,8 +7903,6 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
> break;
>
> case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
> - preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
> - preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
> preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
> preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 19:17 [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched: dynamic: Make PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY Mark Rutland
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 10:08 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt_schedule{,_notrace}() Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 13:23 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-08-07 1:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched: dynamic: Remove HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_{CALL,KEY} Mark Rutland
2026-08-07 1:54 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 15:26 ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-03 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt model accessors Mark Rutland
2026-08-07 2:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-02 7:54 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mete Durlu
2026-08-06 12:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-07 3:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-03 1:30 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-07 3:33 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-01 16:04 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc4a40c9-d297-4269-aa0f-d2f9fedde1ec@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®