mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/11] rseq: Avoid pointless evaluation in __rseq_notify_resume()
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 10:23:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fdb9b21-a918-44bb-b9a0-cd8cbe6379c7@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250813162823.845026450@linutronix.de>

On 2025-08-13 12:29, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The RSEQ critical section mechanism only clears the event mask when a
> critical section is registered, otherwise it is stale and collects
> bits.
> 
> That means once a critical section is installed the first invocation of
> that code when TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is set will abort the critical section,
> even when the TIF bit was not raised by the rseq preempt/migrate/signal
> helpers.
> 
> This also has a performance implication because TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is a
> multiplexing TIF bit, which is utilized by quite some infrastructure. That
> means every invocation of __rseq_notify_resume() goes unconditionally
> through the heavy lifting of user space access and consistency checks even
> if there is no reason to do so.
> 
> Keeping the stale event mask around when exiting to user space also
> prevents it from being utilized by the upcoming time slice extension
> mechanism.
> 
> Avoid this by reading and clearing the event mask before doing the user
> space critical section access with preemption disabled, which ensures that
> the read and clear operation is CPU local atomic versus scheduling.
> 
> This is correct as after re-enabling preemption any relevant event will set
> the bit again and raise TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, which makes the user space exit
> code take another round of TIF bit clearing.
> 
> If the event mask was non-zero, invoke the slow path. On debug kernels the
> slow path is invoked unconditionally and the result of the event mask
> evaluation is handed in.
> 
> Add a exit path check after the TIF bit loop, which validates on debug
> kernels that the event mask is zero before exiting to user space.
> 
> While at it reword the convoluted comment why the pt_regs pointer can be
> NULL under certain circumstances.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/irq-entry-common.h |    7 ++--
>   include/linux/rseq.h             |   10 +++++
>   kernel/rseq.c                    |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/irq-entry-common.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq-entry-common.h
> @@ -2,11 +2,12 @@
>   #ifndef __LINUX_IRQENTRYCOMMON_H
>   #define __LINUX_IRQENTRYCOMMON_H
>   
> +#include <linux/context_tracking.h>
> +#include <linux/kmsan.h>
> +#include <linux/rseq.h>
>   #include <linux/static_call_types.h>
>   #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> -#include <linux/context_tracking.h>
>   #include <linux/tick.h>
> -#include <linux/kmsan.h>
>   #include <linux/unwind_deferred.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/entry-common.h>
> @@ -226,6 +227,8 @@ static __always_inline void exit_to_user
>   
>   	arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(regs, ti_work);
>   
> +	rseq_exit_to_user_mode();
> +
>   	/* Ensure that kernel state is sane for a return to userspace */
>   	kmap_assert_nomap();
>   	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> --- a/include/linux/rseq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rseq.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,14 @@ static inline void rseq_migrate(struct t
>   	rseq_set_notify_resume(t);
>   }
>   
> +static __always_inline void rseq_exit_to_user_mode(void)
> +{
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ)) {
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(current->rseq && current->rseq_event_mask))
> +			current->rseq_event_mask = 0;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * If parent process has a registered restartable sequences area, the
>    * child inherits. Unregister rseq for a clone with CLONE_VM set.
> @@ -118,7 +126,7 @@ static inline void rseq_fork(struct task
>   static inline void rseq_execve(struct task_struct *t)
>   {
>   }
> -
> +static inline void rseq_exit_to_user_mode(void) { }
>   #endif
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
> --- a/kernel/rseq.c
> +++ b/kernel/rseq.c
> @@ -324,9 +324,9 @@ static bool rseq_warn_flags(const char *
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> -static int rseq_need_restart(struct task_struct *t, u32 cs_flags)
> +static int rseq_check_flags(struct task_struct *t, u32 cs_flags)
>   {
> -	u32 flags, event_mask;
> +	u32 flags;
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	if (rseq_warn_flags("rseq_cs", cs_flags))
> @@ -339,17 +339,7 @@ static int rseq_need_restart(struct task
>   
>   	if (rseq_warn_flags("rseq", flags))
>   		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Load and clear event mask atomically with respect to
> -	 * scheduler preemption and membarrier IPIs.
> -	 */
> -	scoped_guard(RSEQ_EVENT_GUARD) {
> -		event_mask = t->rseq_event_mask;
> -		t->rseq_event_mask = 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	return !!event_mask;
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static int clear_rseq_cs(struct rseq __user *rseq)
> @@ -380,7 +370,7 @@ static bool in_rseq_cs(unsigned long ip,
>   	return ip - rseq_cs->start_ip < rseq_cs->post_commit_offset;
>   }
>   
> -static int rseq_ip_fixup(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static int rseq_ip_fixup(struct pt_regs *regs, bool abort)
>   {
>   	unsigned long ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
>   	struct task_struct *t = current;
> @@ -398,9 +388,11 @@ static int rseq_ip_fixup(struct pt_regs
>   	 */
>   	if (!in_rseq_cs(ip, &rseq_cs))
>   		return clear_rseq_cs(t->rseq);
> -	ret = rseq_need_restart(t, rseq_cs.flags);
> -	if (ret <= 0)
> +	ret = rseq_check_flags(t, rseq_cs.flags);
> +	if (ret < 0)
>   		return ret;
> +	if (!abort)

Sorry I'm missing context. Which prior patch introduces this "abort"
variable ?

The rest looks good,

Thanks,

Mathieu

> +		return 0;
>   	ret = clear_rseq_cs(t->rseq);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
> @@ -430,14 +422,44 @@ void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct
>   		return;
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * regs is NULL if and only if the caller is in a syscall path.  Skip
> -	 * fixup and leave rseq_cs as is so that rseq_sycall() will detect and
> -	 * kill a misbehaving userspace on debug kernels.
> +	 * If invoked from hypervisors or IO-URING, then @regs is a NULL
> +	 * pointer, so fixup cannot be done. If the syscall which led to
> +	 * this invocation was invoked inside a critical section, then it
> +	 * will either end up in this code again or a possible violation of
> +	 * a syscall inside a critical region can only be detected by the
> +	 * debug code in rseq_syscall() in a debug enabled kernel.
>   	 */
>   	if (regs) {
> -		ret = rseq_ip_fixup(regs);
> -		if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> -			goto error;
> +		/*
> +		 * Read and clear the event mask first. If the task was not
> +		 * preempted or migrated or a signal is on the way, there
> +		 * is no point in doing any of the heavy lifting here on
> +		 * production kernels. In that case TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME was
> +		 * raised by some other functionality.
> +		 *
> +		 * This is correct because the read/clear operation is
> +		 * guarded against scheduler preemption, which makes it CPU
> +		 * local atomic. If the task is preempted right after
> +		 * re-enabling preemption then TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is set
> +		 * again and this function is invoked another time _before_
> +		 * the task is able to return to user mode.
> +		 *
> +		 * On a debug kernel, invoke the fixup code unconditionally
> +		 * with the result handed in to allow the detection of
> +		 * inconsistencies.
> +		 */
> +		u32 event_mask;
> +
> +		scoped_guard(RSEQ_EVENT_GUARD) {
> +			event_mask = t->rseq_event_mask;
> +			t->rseq_event_mask = 0;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ) || event_mask) {
> +			ret = rseq_ip_fixup(regs, !!event_mask);
> +			if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> +				goto error;
> +		}
>   	}
>   	if (unlikely(rseq_update_cpu_node_id(t)))
>   		goto error;
> 


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-20 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-13 16:29 [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 01/11] rseq: Avoid pointless evaluation in __rseq_notify_resume() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:23   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 02/11] rseq: Condense the inline stubs Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:24   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 03/11] rseq: Rename rseq_syscall() to rseq_debug_syscall_exit() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 04/11] rseq: Replace the pointless event mask bit fiddling Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 05/11] rseq: Optimize the signal delivery path Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 06/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space further Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 07/11] entry: Cleanup header Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 17:09   ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze
2025-08-13 21:30     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 08/11] entry: Distinguish between syscall and interrupt exit Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 09/11] entry: Provide exit_to_user_notify_resume() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 10/11] rseq: Skip fixup when returning from a syscall Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-14  8:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-14 13:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 11/11] rseq: Convert to masked user access where applicable Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 17:45 ` [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Jens Axboe
2025-08-13 21:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 21:36     ` Jens Axboe
2025-08-13 22:08       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-17 21:23         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 14:00           ` BUG: rseq selftests and librseq vs. glibc fail Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 14:15             ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 17:13               ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 19:33                 ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 19:46                   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 19:55                     ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 20:27                       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 23:54                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-19  0:28                           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-19  6:18                             ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-29 18:44                 ` Prakash Sangappa
2025-08-29 18:50                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-09-01 19:30                     ` Prakash Sangappa
2025-08-18 17:38           ` [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Michael Jeanson
2025-08-18 20:21             ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 21:29               ` Michael Jeanson
2025-08-18 23:43                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:27           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-20 14:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8fdb9b21-a918-44bb-b9a0-cd8cbe6379c7@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjeanson@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®