mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Yi Sun' <yi.sun@intel.com>,
	"dave.hansen@intel.com" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "sohil.mehta@intel.com" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"heng.su@intel.com" <heng.su@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu: Measure the Latency of XSAVE and XRSTOR
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 20:54:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <921078bc2a994d3ab6aba26d4654cb47@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220723083800.824442-2-yi.sun@intel.com>

From: Yi Sun
> Sent: 23 July 2022 09:38
> 
> Calculate the latency of instructions xsave and xrstor with new trace
> points x86_fpu_latency_xsave and x86_fpu_latency_xrstor.
> 
> The delta TSC can be calculated within a single trace event. Another
> option considered was to have 2 separated trace events marking the
> start and finish of the xsave/xrstor instructions. The delta TSC was
> calculated from the 2 trace points in user space, but there was
> significant overhead added by the trace function itself.
> 
> In internal testing, the single trace point option which is
> implemented here proved to be more accurate.
...

I've done some experiments that measure short instruction latencies.
Basically I found:
1) You need a suitable serialising instruction before and after
   the code being tested - otherwise it can overlap whatever
   you are using for timing.
2) The only reliable counter is the performance monitor clock
   counter - everything else depends on the current cpu frequency.
   On intel cpu the cpu frequency can change all the time.
Allowing for that, and then ignoring complete outliers, I could
get clock-count accurate values for iterations of the IP csum loop.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-24 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-23  8:37 [PATCH 0/2] x86: Add xsave/xrstor Latency Trace Events and Consuming Script Yi Sun
2022-07-23  8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu: Measure the Latency of XSAVE and XRSTOR Yi Sun
2022-07-24 20:54   ` David Laight [this message]
2022-07-24 23:00     ` Luck, Tony
2022-07-25  7:35       ` David Laight
2022-07-25 17:44     ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26  7:41       ` David Laight
2022-07-26  9:03     ` 'Yi Sun'
2022-07-28 18:46   ` Sohil Mehta
2022-07-23  8:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] scripts/x86: Add script to consume trace log of xsave latency Yi Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=921078bc2a994d3ab6aba26d4654cb47@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=heng.su@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.sun@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®