mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyaz.mohammed@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] edac: qcom: add LCP/SRP DDR DRAM ECC support for Shikra
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 17:31:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <984bc755-07f1-4c7e-9efe-ecc6b2ee5d5f@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016182608.65bae12d@jic23-hlaptop>



On 16-10-2026 22:56, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 21:26:18 +0530
> Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyaz.mohammed@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Add qcom_llcc_lcp_setup() to enable LCP/SRP interrupt routing when
>> firmware has not pre-configured it, and llcc_lcp_ecc_irq_handler() to
>> report per-bank correctable and uncorrectable DDR DRAM ECC errors.
>>
>> LCP/SRP setup is skipped when ecc_irq_configured is set (e.g. Shikra,
>> where DSF firmware handles IRQ routing). A missing lcp_irq is
>> non-fatal; TRP/DRP ECC reporting continues unaffected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyaz.mohammed@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Trivial stuff only inline.
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 147 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
>> index f3da9385ca0d..b4f7b2493650 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
> 
>>  /* Clear the error interrupt and counter registers */
>>  static int
>>  qcom_llcc_clear_error_status(int err_type, struct llcc_drv_data *drv)
>> @@ -334,6 +366,92 @@ static void llcc_ecc_check(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edev_ctl)
>>  	llcc_ecc_irq_handler(0, edev_ctl);
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Handler for the optional LCP/SRP DDR DRAM ECC interrupt
>> + * (ddrss_apps_interrupt[1]).  The LCP/SRP registers live in each LLCC
>> + * instance's address space, so iterate over all banks and read status
>> + * per-instance.  Broadcast-write the clear after the full loop, mirroring
>> + * the TRP/DRP handler pattern.
>> + */
>> +static irqreturn_t llcc_lcp_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
>> +{
>> +	struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev_ctl = edev_ctl;
>> +	struct llcc_drv_data *drv = edac_dev_ctl->dev->platform_data;
>> +	const struct llcc_edac_reg_offset *reg = drv->edac_reg_offset;
>> +	irqreturn_t irq_rc = IRQ_NONE;
>> +	u32 intr_status, err_status, clr_reg;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Iterate over banks: LCP/SRP status registers are per-LLCC instance */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < drv->num_banks; i++) {
> 	for (int i = 0;
> 
> Fine in modern kernel code and makes scope more explicit.
> 
Done.

>> +		ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[i], reg->lcp_srp_interrupt_status,
> 
> I'd use a local variable to hold the regmap pointer.
> 
Done — added struct regmap *regmap = drv->regmaps[i] at the top of
the loop body.

>> +				  &intr_status);
>> +		if (ret)
> 
> A read fail, without any logging seems unwise as you may have just jumped the
> error.
> 
Good point — added edac_printk(KERN_ERR) for the interrupt status read
failure, consistent with the error status read path below it.

>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		intr_status &= LCP_SB_ECC_ERROR | LCP_DB_ECC_ERROR;
>> +		if (!intr_status)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		irq_rc = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +
>> +		ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[i], reg->lcp_srp_ecc_error_status1,
>> +				  &err_status);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_LLCC,
>> +				    "LCP/SRP error status read failed for bank%u: %d\n",
>> +				    i, ret);
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (intr_status & LCP_DB_ECC_ERROR) {
>> +			u32 db_cnt = FIELD_GET(LCP_DB_ERR_COUNT_MASK, err_status);
>> +
>> +			edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC,
>> +				    "LCP/SRP DDR DRAM Double-bit ECC error in bank%u: count=%u status=0x%08x\n",
>> +				    i, db_cnt, err_status);
>> +			edac_device_handle_ue(edac_dev_ctl, 0, i,
>> +					      "LCP/SRP DDR DRAM uncorrectable error");
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (intr_status & LCP_SB_ECC_ERROR) {
>> +			u32 sb_cnt = FIELD_GET(LCP_SB_ERR_COUNT_MASK, err_status);
>> +
>> +			edac_printk(KERN_WARNING, EDAC_LLCC,
>> +				    "LCP/SRP DDR DRAM Single-bit ECC error in bank%u: count=%u status=0x%08x\n",
>> +				    i, sb_cnt, err_status);
>> +			edac_device_handle_ce(edac_dev_ctl, 0, i,
>> +					      "LCP/SRP DDR DRAM correctable error");
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (irq_rc != IRQ_HANDLED)
>> +		return irq_rc;
>> +
>> +	clr_reg = reg->lcp_srp_interrupt_clear ?
>> +			reg->lcp_srp_interrupt_clear :
>> +			reg->lcp_srp_interrupt_status;
>> +
>> +	if (clr_reg) {
>> +		ret = regmap_write(drv->bcast_regmap, clr_reg,
>> +				   LCP_SB_ECC_ERROR | LCP_DB_ECC_ERROR);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_LLCC,
>> +				    "LCP/SRP interrupt clear failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (reg->lcp_srp_ecc_error_cntr_clear) {
>> +		ret = regmap_write(drv->bcast_regmap,
>> +				   reg->lcp_srp_ecc_error_cntr_clear,
>> +				   DRP_TRP_CNT_CLEAR);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_LLCC,
>> +				    "LCP/SRP counter clear failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return irq_rc;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int qcom_llcc_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	struct llcc_drv_data *llcc_driv_data = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> @@ -372,6 +490,8 @@ static int qcom_llcc_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  			edac_op_state = EDAC_OPSTATE_INT;
>>  			goto irq_done;
>>  		}
>> +		dev_warn(dev, "failed to request LLCC ECC irq %d: %d, falling back to polling\n",
>> +			 ecc_irq, rc);
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/* Fall back to polling mode otherwise */
>> @@ -386,6 +506,33 @@ static int qcom_llcc_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		return rc;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Set up LCP/SRP DDR DRAM ECC after the EDAC device is published.
>> +	 * Skip hardware routing setup if firmware already configured IRQ
>> +	 * propagation (irq_configured); only request the IRQ handler.
>> +	 * Guard on a non-zero lcp_srp_interrupt_enable offset to confirm
>> +	 * this LLCC variant actually has an LCP/SRP block.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (llcc_driv_data->lcp_irq > 0 &&
>> +	    llcc_driv_data->edac_reg_offset->lcp_srp_interrupt_enable) {
>> +		if (!llcc_driv_data->ecc_irq_configured) {
>> +			rc = qcom_llcc_lcp_setup(llcc_driv_data,
>> +						 llcc_driv_data->bcast_regmap);
>> +			if (rc) {
>> +				dev_warn(dev, "LCP/SRP interrupt setup failed: %d\n", rc);
> 
>> +				goto lcp_done;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +		rc = devm_request_irq(dev, llcc_driv_data->lcp_irq,
>> +				      llcc_lcp_ecc_irq_handler,
>> +				      0, "llcc_lcp_ecc", edev_ctl);
>> +		if (rc)
>> +			dev_warn(dev,
>> +				 "failed to request LCP ECC irq %d: %d, DDR DRAM ECC reporting disabled\n",
>> +				 llcc_driv_data->lcp_irq, rc);
>> +	}
>> +lcp_done:
>> +	rc = 0;
>>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, edev_ctl);
>>  
>>  	return rc;
>>
> 
Thanks & regards,
Mohammed Faiyaz


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14 15:56 [PATCH 0/4] edac: qcom: add DDR DRAM ECC reporting for Shikra (QCM2390) Faiyaz Mohammed
2026-10-14 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: allow optional second interrupt for LCP/SRP ECC Faiyaz Mohammed
2026-10-17 16:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-21 11:47     ` Faiyaz Mohammed
2026-10-14 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] soc: qcom: llcc: add LCP/SRP DDR DRAM ECC register offsets Faiyaz Mohammed
2026-10-16 17:20   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 11:49     ` Faiyaz Mohammed
2026-10-17 16:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-21 11:54     ` Faiyaz Mohammed
2026-10-14 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] edac: qcom: add LCP/SRP DDR DRAM ECC support for Shikra Faiyaz Mohammed
2026-10-16 17:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 12:01     ` Faiyaz Mohammed [this message]
2026-10-14 15:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: shikra: add LCP/SRP ECC interrupt to LLCC node Faiyaz Mohammed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=984bc755-07f1-4c7e-9efe-ecc6b2ee5d5f@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=faiyaz.mohammed@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®